About Gospelware

Gospelware is the best mobile app development company. They join industry insight with experience & intuition to develop user-centered, sustainable mobile & web apps, changing the digital presence of your business. Their way towards their client is not known but a very special which keep us apart from rest of the lot. Their team is masters of their system & experts in their work.

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development Wearable App Development UI-UX Design Custom Software Development Internet of Things

Industries Served

Gaming & Gambling

Gospelware Reviews

Write a Review

Edge computing architecture that handles our sensor load without breaking a sweat

Antoine Lefevre / Directeur Technique - Lumiere Digital SAS
Verified
Jan 30, 2022

Project summary: We had a clear product vision but lacked the engineering capacity internally to execute it within the window our market opportunity required.

Our previous agency had given us a platform that worked well enough to demo and fell apart under real load. This team came in, diagnosed the root causes accurately, and rebuilt the critical components without disrupting the live service. The performance improvements were immediate and measurable — page load times dropped by 60 percent, error rates dropped to near zero, and our support team has far fewer incidents to deal with. The contrast with our previous experience could not have been sharper.

PROS

Collaborative working style that made them feel like an extension of our team, excellent written communication for our async timezone relationship, clean and readable codebase

CONS

Premium pricing compared to some of the alternatives we evaluated, but the quality of the output and the absence of rework costs made the investment straightforward to justify

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeIoT Development
IndustryGaming & Gambling
Project Cost$150,000 to $499,999
DurationJan 2025 – Mar 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As Directeur Technique at Lumiere Digital SAS, I manage a cross-functional technology team serving our Gaming & Gambling clients from Paris, France. We are a commercially focused organisation and every technology decision we make is evaluated against a clear business case. We needed a partner who understood that context, not just the technical brief.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our Gaming & Gambling regulatory environment had changed and the compliance timeline was non-negotiable. We needed to rebuild specific components of our system to meet the new requirements and our internal team was already fully committed to the core product roadmap. Bringing in a specialist IoT Development partner was the only realistic path.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end IoT Development delivery with a particular emphasis on the integration layer that connected the new build to our existing Gaming & Gambling infrastructure. They also provided UI/UX input that was not in the original scope but which they offered proactively because they could see it would affect adoption. That kind of initiative was characteristic of how they approached the whole engagement.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We evaluated four vendors in total. Two were eliminated after the technical assessment stage because their proposed architectures showed a surface-level understanding of what we needed. This team's proposal demonstrated genuine depth in IoT Development and specific knowledge of the Gaming & Gambling sector that the others could not match. The reference calls confirmed a consistent pattern of delivery.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Extremely well. They asked detailed questions, challenged vague requirements until they were specific, and proposed sensible defaults for decisions we had not yet made rather than just leaving them open. By the time development started there was no ambiguity in the backlog, which is a rare starting position.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. We used a shared project management tool that gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every meeting. The project manager had a clear escalation path and used it appropriately. The only time I needed to intervene directly was when I chose to, not because something had been missed.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes on both counts. There was one sprint where a third-party integration took longer than scoped because of undocumented API behaviour on the vendor side. The team flagged it immediately, proposed two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the timeline within two weeks. That is how scope issues should be handled and rarely are.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live three months ago. In that time we have not had a single P1 incident, our page performance scores have improved across every measure, and the feature we had deprioritised for years because the old architecture made it too complex to implement is now in our next sprint. The platform they built has opened up our roadmap in a way we had not anticipated.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The quality of the written communication. This matters more than most clients articulate. Clear, concise, technically accurate updates that our non-technical stakeholders could read and understand. Proposals and change requests that made the decision obvious rather than obscuring it in jargon. That communication quality reduced our internal coordination overhead significantly.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. The referral I would give comes with context: they are not the cheapest option and they are not the fastest to schedule. If you are optimising purely on price or looking for someone to start tomorrow, there are other choices. If you want the work done properly and a partner you can trust with a complex, high-stakes IoT Development engagement, this team is the answer.

FAQs

Which industries does Gospelware serve?
Gospelware has experience working with businesses across multiple industries, including Gaming & Gambling, Government & Public Sector, Media & Entertainment, Insurance, Fashion & Apparel and Nonprofit & NGO.
Why should businesses choose Gospelware?
Businesses may choose Gospelware based on factors such as technical expertise, industry experience, client reviews, development methodology, communication practices, and the ability to deliver scalable software solutions that align with business objectives. Founded in 2010, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
Does Gospelware provide post-launch support and maintenance?
Many software development companies, including Gospelware, offer ongoing maintenance, bug fixes, performance optimization, security updates, feature enhancements, and technical support after project deployment. For context, its listed capabilities span Custom Software Development, Internet of Things, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design and Wearable App Development, and it has been operating since 2010.
How do I choose the right software development company?
When selecting a software development company like Gospelware, consider its portfolio, client reviews, industry expertise, technical capabilities, communication process, pricing model, project management approach, and post-launch support. For context, it has experience across industries such as Gaming & Gambling, Government & Public Sector, Media & Entertainment, Insurance, Fashion & Apparel and Nonprofit & NGO, and its average project cost is reported at $10000+.
Does Gospelware offer dedicated developers?
Yes, many companies like Gospelware provide a dedicated developer hiring model, allowing businesses to scale their in-house team with experienced professionals who work exclusively on their project. For context, its listed capabilities span Custom Software Development, Internet of Things, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design and Wearable App Development, and it has served clients in United-kingdom.
Which countries does Gospelware serve?
Gospelware may serve clients across multiple countries and regions, including United-kingdom, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
Can Gospelware modernize legacy software?
Gospelware may provide legacy software modernization services, including re-platforming, code refactoring, and migration to modern frameworks or cloud infrastructure to improve performance and maintainability. For context, its listed capabilities span Custom Software Development, Internet of Things, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design and Wearable App Development, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
What is Gospelware's software development process?
Gospelware typically follows a structured software development process that may include requirement analysis, UI/UX design, agile development sprints, quality assurance testing, deployment, and post-launch support. For context, it has experience across industries such as Gaming & Gambling, Government & Public Sector, Media & Entertainment, Insurance, Fashion & Apparel and Nonprofit & NGO, and its typical hourly rate is around N/A.
How do I request a proposal from Gospelware?
You can request a proposal from Gospelware by submitting your project requirements through its website contact form, email, or by reaching out directly to discuss your business goals and receive a tailored development estimate. For context, its listed capabilities span Custom Software Development, Internet of Things, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design and Wearable App Development, and its typical hourly rate is around N/A.

Company Info

Founded 2010
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate N/A
Avg. Project Cost $45,000+
Client Rating 4.4/5 (11 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.4
Schedule
4.4
Cost
4.2
Communication
4.4