About Dynport

They have developed digital products since 2009. They work with entrepreneurs and companies continuously. They deliver software with agile methods for large audiences. They are passionate about developing, programming and testing software in strong teams. Their clients profit from their participation in multiple ways as they transfer our knowledge to them.

Services

Mobile App Development Custom Software Development Cloud Solutions

Industries Served

Agriculture

Dynport Reviews

Write a Review

Project delivered with the kind of professionalism that earns a long-term relationship

Rafael Almeida / CTO - Horizonte Digital Ltda
Verified
Sep 27, 2022

Project summary: We had a clear product vision but lacked the engineering capacity internally to execute it within the window our market opportunity required.

Our industry has specific compliance requirements that many generalist agencies struggle with. This team came with working knowledge of the relevant frameworks, asked pointed questions about our obligations, and built controls into the architecture rather than bolting them on at the end. Our compliance team reviewed the delivered system and had only minor observations, which is genuinely unusual for a first-pass review. That domain awareness saved us significant remediation cost.

PROS

Collaborative working style that made them feel like an extension of our team, excellent written communication for our async timezone relationship, clean and readable codebase

CONS

The volume of quality documentation they produced was genuinely impressive but also meant our team needed dedicated time to review it properly — a minor process point, not a complaint

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypePOS System Development
IndustryAgriculture
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationDec 2024 – Oct 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Horizonte Digital Ltda, a mid-sized organisation in the Agriculture sector headquartered in São Paulo, Brazil. My remit as CTO covers everything from infrastructure to product development. We had reached a point where our internal engineering capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap without an experienced external partner.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate trigger was a performance failure during our peak trading period that cost us measurably in both revenue and client trust. The root cause was architectural and our internal team did not have the POS System Development expertise to address it properly. We needed specialists.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily POS System Development, though the scope naturally touched adjacent areas. They handled architecture design, implementation, integration with our existing systems, performance testing under realistic load, and knowledge transfer to our internal team. The breadth of what they covered without requiring us to bring in additional vendors was one of the reasons the project ran efficiently.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
Price was a factor but not the deciding one. They were mid-range in our evaluation. What tipped it was the combination of their technical depth in POS System Development, the seniority of the team they proposed to assign to our account, and the clarity of their project governance model. We had been burned by an agency that overpromised before and we needed to see evidence of process maturity.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thorough and precise. They translated our business language into technical requirements without losing the intent, which is a skill that sounds straightforward but frequently goes wrong. Every user story they wrote was reviewed against the original business objective before it entered the sprint and the acceptance criteria were specific enough to remove subjectivity from QA.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management was the best I have experienced in a vendor relationship. We had fortnightly sprint reviews with structured agendas, a shared backlog that we could inspect at any point, a risk register that was actively maintained rather than created at kickoff and never opened again, and a project manager who treated our time as something worth protecting. Communication was proactive, not reactive.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on the agreed delivery date and within the approved budget. We did add scope during the engagement — two features that became apparent as essential during user testing — and those were quoted, approved, and delivered without affecting the original scope timeline. That kind of clean change management is not something you can take for granted.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is that the problem we hired them to solve no longer exists. Beyond that, the new POS System Development platform has reduced our operational overhead measurably, our team spends less time managing incidents and more time on product development, and we have been able to onboard two new enterprise clients who had previously cited our technical limitations as a barrier.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The quality of the written communication. This matters more than most clients articulate. Clear, concise, technically accurate updates that our non-technical stakeholders could read and understand. Proposals and change requests that made the decision obvious rather than obscuring it in jargon. That communication quality reduced our internal coordination overhead significantly.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. I would recommend them with a specific note that the quality of the discovery process is where the value starts. Clients who invest properly in that phase will get the most out of the engagement. We made that investment and the returns are evident in the quality of what was delivered.

FAQs

Which industries does Dynport serve?
Dynport has experience working with businesses across multiple industries, including Agriculture, Aerospace & Defense, Retail & E-commerce, Travel & Hospitality, Environmental Services and Financial Services.
Is Dynport suitable for startups?
Yes. Many startups choose companies like Dynport because they offer MVP development, product consulting, scalable architecture, and dedicated development teams that help launch products quickly while managing development costs. For context, it has experience across industries such as Agriculture, Aerospace & Defense, Retail & E-commerce, Travel & Hospitality, Environmental Services and Financial Services, and its typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49.
What technologies does Dynport specialize in?
Depending on the project requirements, Dynport may work with technologies such as React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, iOS, Android, AWS, Azure, AI, and cloud platforms. For context, its listed capabilities span Cloud Solutions, Custom Software Development and Mobile App Development, and it has experience across industries such as Agriculture, Aerospace & Defense, Retail & E-commerce, Travel & Hospitality, Environmental Services and Financial Services.
How long does Dynport take to complete a software project?
Project timelines vary depending on scope and complexity. A simple MVP may take a few weeks, while enterprise software or large-scale digital transformation projects can require several months of development, testing, and deployment. With a team of 2 - 9 professionals, Dynport can scale resources based on project urgency.
Why should businesses choose Dynport?
Businesses may choose Dynport based on factors such as technical expertise, industry experience, client reviews, development methodology, communication practices, and the ability to deliver scalable software solutions that align with business objectives. Founded in 2008, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
How can I contact Dynport for a project?
Businesses can contact Dynport through its official website, email, or contact form to discuss project requirements, request a consultation, or receive a development estimate. For context, it has served clients in Germany, and its listed capabilities span Cloud Solutions, Custom Software Development and Mobile App Development.
Is Dynport an offshore software development company?
Dynport may operate as an offshore, onshore, or hybrid software development company depending on its location and the markets it serves. For context, it has experience across industries such as Agriculture, Aerospace & Defense, Retail & E-commerce, Travel & Hospitality, Environmental Services and Financial Services, and its typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49.
Does Dynport offer dedicated developers?
Yes, many companies like Dynport provide a dedicated developer hiring model, allowing businesses to scale their in-house team with experienced professionals who work exclusively on their project. For context, it has experience across industries such as Agriculture, Aerospace & Defense, Retail & E-commerce, Travel & Hospitality, Environmental Services and Financial Services, and it has served clients in Germany.
Does Dynport develop SaaS products?
Yes, Dynport may offer SaaS product development services, including multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing integration, and cloud-native deployment for scalable software-as-a-service solutions. For context, it has experience across industries such as Agriculture, Aerospace & Defense, Retail & E-commerce, Travel & Hospitality, Environmental Services and Financial Services, and it has been operating since 2008.

Company Info

Founded 2008
Employees 2 - 9
Hourly Rate $25 - $49
Avg. Project Cost $30,000+
Client Rating 4.2/5 (11 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.3
Schedule
4.2
Cost
4.2
Communication
4.1