About Everest Agency

They see an opportunity to gain the best view of the world and they have the expertise to reach the top. They know that what their clients expect and take vast pride in being one of the few businesses that can claim industry awards project after project. They strive to challenge themselves on each project and make it better than the one before while learning something new and adding to our arsenal of business building tools.

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development UI-UX Design Custom Software Development Web Design Branding E-commerce Development

Industries Served

Automotive

Everest Agency Reviews

Write a Review

SEO strategy that moved us from page three to page one in four months

Wei Jian Lim / CTO - Lion City Ventures Pte Ltd
Verified
Nov 10, 2022

Project summary: The shift to EVs required us to build a connected vehicle data platform capable of handling telemetry from a growing fleet while supporting over-the-air software updates.

Our industry has specific compliance requirements that many generalist agencies struggle with. This team came with working knowledge of the relevant frameworks, asked pointed questions about our obligations, and built controls into the architecture rather than bolting them on at the end. Our compliance team reviewed the delivered system and had only minor observations, which is genuinely unusual for a first-pass review. That domain awareness saved us significant remediation cost.

PROS

Engineering quality that our internal team can maintain without calling the vendor, thorough documentation, proactive risk identification throughout the project

CONS

Their calendar books up quickly which made scheduling the initial kickoff slightly challenging — a good problem for them to have and not one that affected our delivery

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeDigital Marketing
IndustryAutomotive
Project Cost$10,000 to $49,999
DurationMar 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As CTO at Lion City Ventures Pte Ltd, I manage a cross-functional technology team serving our Automotive clients from Singapore. We are a commercially focused organisation and every technology decision we make is evaluated against a clear business case. We needed a partner who understood that context, not just the technical brief.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Growth into new markets had exposed serious limitations in our platform. What had worked for our original user base in Singapore was not going to scale internationally, and the Digital Marketing requirements for those new markets were meaningfully different. We needed a partner who had solved that kind of problem before.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily Digital Marketing, though the scope naturally touched adjacent areas. They handled architecture design, implementation, integration with our existing systems, performance testing under realistic load, and knowledge transfer to our internal team. The breadth of what they covered without requiring us to bring in additional vendors was one of the reasons the project ran efficiently.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
Price was a factor but not the deciding one. They were mid-range in our evaluation. What tipped it was the combination of their technical depth in Digital Marketing, the seniority of the team they proposed to assign to our account, and the clarity of their project governance model. We had been burned by an agency that overpromised before and we needed to see evidence of process maturity.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thorough and precise. They translated our business language into technical requirements without losing the intent, which is a skill that sounds straightforward but frequently goes wrong. Every user story they wrote was reviewed against the original business objective before it entered the sprint and the acceptance criteria were specific enough to remove subjectivity from QA.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management was the best I have experienced in a vendor relationship. We had fortnightly sprint reviews with structured agendas, a shared backlog that we could inspect at any point, a risk register that was actively maintained rather than created at kickoff and never opened again, and a project manager who treated our time as something worth protecting. Communication was proactive, not reactive.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on the agreed delivery date and within the approved budget. We did add scope during the engagement — two features that became apparent as essential during user testing — and those were quoted, approved, and delivered without affecting the original scope timeline. That kind of clean change management is not something you can take for granted.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live three months ago. In that time we have not had a single P1 incident, our page performance scores have improved across every measure, and the feature we had deprioritised for years because the old architecture made it too complex to implement is now in our next sprint. The platform they built has opened up our roadmap in a way we had not anticipated.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some agencies disappear the moment the final invoice is paid. This team maintained the same level of responsiveness during the hypercare period as during development, handed over thorough documentation without being asked twice, and checked in proactively a month after go-live to review performance metrics with us. That last part was entirely unprompted.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. I would recommend them with a specific note that the quality of the discovery process is where the value starts. Clients who invest properly in that phase will get the most out of the engagement. We made that investment and the returns are evident in the quality of what was delivered.

FAQs

How much does it cost to hire Everest Agency?
The cost of hiring Everest Agency depends on factors such as project complexity, development hours, required technologies, team size, and engagement model. Based on available data, Everest Agency's typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149, with an average project cost of $50000+.
What technologies does Everest Agency specialize in?
Depending on the project requirements, Everest Agency may work with technologies such as React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, iOS, Android, AWS, Azure, AI, and cloud platforms. For context, its listed capabilities span Branding, Custom Software Development, E-commerce Development, Mobile App Development and UI-UX Design, and it has experience across industries such as Sports & Fitness, Automotive, Manufacturing, Real Estate, Insurance and Financial Services.
How long does Everest Agency take to complete a software project?
Project timelines vary depending on scope and complexity. A simple MVP may take a few weeks, while enterprise software or large-scale digital transformation projects can require several months of development, testing, and deployment. With a team of 10 - 49 professionals, Everest Agency can scale resources based on project urgency.
Why should businesses choose Everest Agency?
Businesses may choose Everest Agency based on factors such as technical expertise, industry experience, client reviews, development methodology, communication practices, and the ability to deliver scalable software solutions that align with business objectives. Founded in 2007, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
How do I choose the right software development company?
When selecting a software development company like Everest Agency, consider its portfolio, client reviews, industry expertise, technical capabilities, communication process, pricing model, project management approach, and post-launch support. For context, it has experience across industries such as Sports & Fitness, Automotive, Manufacturing, Real Estate, Insurance and Financial Services, and it has served clients in USA.
Does Everest Agency offer dedicated developers?
Yes, many companies like Everest Agency provide a dedicated developer hiring model, allowing businesses to scale their in-house team with experienced professionals who work exclusively on their project. For context, its listed capabilities span Branding, Custom Software Development, E-commerce Development, Mobile App Development and UI-UX Design, and it has served clients in USA.
Can Everest Agency build AI-powered applications?
Many modern software development companies, including Everest Agency, offer AI and machine learning integration services such as chatbots, predictive analytics, computer vision, and intelligent automation. For context, its listed capabilities span Branding, Custom Software Development, E-commerce Development, Mobile App Development and UI-UX Design, and its typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149.
Does Everest Agency sign an NDA before starting a project?
Most professional software development companies, including Everest Agency, are willing to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) to protect client data and project confidentiality before development begins. For context, its listed capabilities span Branding, Custom Software Development, E-commerce Development, Mobile App Development and UI-UX Design, and it has served clients in USA.
Which countries does Everest Agency serve?
Everest Agency may serve clients across multiple countries and regions, including USA, depending on market demand and business partnerships.

Company Info

Founded 2007
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate $100 - $149
Avg. Project Cost $10,000+
Client Rating 4.3/5 (11 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.4
Schedule
4.3
Cost
4.3
Communication
4.5