About Susco

Susco endures allowing all the people they touch to live more meaningful and fulfilling lives. They believe inability at all levels, whether it’s their client business rules or their own. They believe in constant improvement. They allow effective criticism and become larger because of it. They believe in clarity within the company and they do what they say they are going to do.

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development

Industries Served

Automotive

Susco Reviews

Write a Review

App store ratings climbed immediately after launch — says it all

Jisoo Kwon / CTO - HanRiver Tech Co Ltd
Verified
Jan 06, 2023

Project summary: The shift to EVs required us to build a connected vehicle data platform capable of handling telemetry from a growing fleet while supporting over-the-air software updates.

The thing I appreciate most in retrospect is that they were honest when something was harder than expected. Twice during the project the team came to us proactively to say that a particular component needed more time to do properly and explained why cutting corners would create problems later. We gave them the time. Both decisions were correct. The resulting product is solid and we have had none of the post-launch instability that plagued our last two technology projects.

PROS

Senior engineers on our account throughout the entire project rather than a bait-and-switch to juniors after contract signing, transparent reporting, realistic estimates that proved accurate

CONS

We underestimated the internal resource commitment required on our side during discovery — the team warned us, we did not listen fully, and the first sprint was slower as a result

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeMobile App Development
IndustryAutomotive
Project Cost$10,000 to $49,999
DurationSep 2025 – Feb 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
HanRiver Tech Co Ltd is a Automotive business based in Seoul, South Korea. As CTO I am responsible for all technology investment decisions, vendor selection, and ensuring our digital capabilities match our growth ambitions. We operate in a competitive market where the quality of our software directly affects our ability to win and retain clients.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our Automotive regulatory environment had changed and the compliance timeline was non-negotiable. We needed to rebuild specific components of our system to meet the new requirements and our internal team was already fully committed to the core product roadmap. Bringing in a specialist Mobile App Development partner was the only realistic path.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The full Mobile App Development lifecycle from discovery through to production deployment and hypercare support. This included requirements workshops, solution architecture, sprint-based development, QA and automated testing, deployment to our cloud environment, and a structured handover with documentation. They also provided a brief post-launch period of dedicated support which was genuinely useful.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
Their portfolio included two projects that were sufficiently close to our own brief in terms of complexity, Mobile App Development scope, and Automotive context that we felt confident they understood what we were asking. The proposal was technically rigorous, the pricing was transparent, and the proposed team structure gave us senior engineers throughout rather than just for the pitch.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Extremely well. They asked detailed questions, challenged vague requirements until they were specific, and proposed sensible defaults for decisions we had not yet made rather than just leaving them open. By the time development started there was no ambiguity in the backlog, which is a rare starting position.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. We used a shared project management tool that gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every meeting. The project manager had a clear escalation path and used it appropriately. The only time I needed to intervene directly was when I chose to, not because something had been missed.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on the agreed delivery date and within the approved budget. We did add scope during the engagement — two features that became apparent as essential during user testing — and those were quoted, approved, and delivered without affecting the original scope timeline. That kind of clean change management is not something you can take for granted.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The ROI case we presented to our board assumed a payback period of eighteen months. Based on current trajectory we will hit that in under a year. The efficiency gains in our Automotive operations have been more significant than the model projected, partly because the quality of the data coming out of the new system is enabling decisions we could not make before.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who scoped the work were the engineers who built it. That sounds like it should be standard practice but in my experience it often is not. The institutional knowledge that comes from that continuity pays dividends at every stage, particularly when you are dealing with a complex Automotive domain where context takes time to build.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active conversation about the next phase of work and I expect this to become a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Automotive space looking for a Mobile App Development partner who combines technical rigour with genuine commercial awareness, I would put this team at the top of the shortlist.

FAQs

How much does it cost to hire Susco?
The cost of hiring Susco depends on factors such as project complexity, development hours, required technologies, team size, and engagement model. Based on available data, Susco's typical hourly rate is around N/A, with an average project cost of $50000+.
How long does Susco take to complete a software project?
Project timelines vary depending on scope and complexity. A simple MVP may take a few weeks, while enterprise software or large-scale digital transformation projects can require several months of development, testing, and deployment. With a team of 10 - 49 professionals, Susco can scale resources based on project urgency.
Does Susco provide post-launch support and maintenance?
Many software development companies, including Susco, offer ongoing maintenance, bug fixes, performance optimization, security updates, feature enhancements, and technical support after project deployment. For context, it has experience across industries such as Insurance, Logistics & Supply Chain, Automotive, Financial Services, Aerospace & Defense and Human Resources, and it has served clients in USA.
How can I contact Susco for a project?
Businesses can contact Susco through its official website, email, or contact form to discuss project requirements, request a consultation, or receive a development estimate. For context, it has experience across industries such as Insurance, Logistics & Supply Chain, Automotive, Financial Services, Aerospace & Defense and Human Resources, and its listed capabilities span Mobile App Development and Web Development.
How do I choose the right software development company?
When selecting a software development company like Susco, consider its portfolio, client reviews, industry expertise, technical capabilities, communication process, pricing model, project management approach, and post-launch support. For context, its listed capabilities span Mobile App Development and Web Development, and its average project cost is reported at $50000+.
Can Susco build AI-powered applications?
Many modern software development companies, including Susco, offer AI and machine learning integration services such as chatbots, predictive analytics, computer vision, and intelligent automation. For context, its listed capabilities span Mobile App Development and Web Development, and it has experience across industries such as Insurance, Logistics & Supply Chain, Automotive, Financial Services, Aerospace & Defense and Human Resources.
Does Susco sign an NDA before starting a project?
Most professional software development companies, including Susco, are willing to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) to protect client data and project confidentiality before development begins. For context, it has served clients in USA, and it has been operating since 2006.
Which countries does Susco serve?
Susco may serve clients across multiple countries and regions, including USA, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
Can Susco modernize legacy software?
Susco may provide legacy software modernization services, including re-platforming, code refactoring, and migration to modern frameworks or cloud infrastructure to improve performance and maintainability. For context, it has experience across industries such as Insurance, Logistics & Supply Chain, Automotive, Financial Services, Aerospace & Defense and Human Resources, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
What is Susco's software development process?
Susco typically follows a structured software development process that may include requirement analysis, UI/UX design, agile development sprints, quality assurance testing, deployment, and post-launch support. For context, it has experience across industries such as Insurance, Logistics & Supply Chain, Automotive, Financial Services, Aerospace & Defense and Human Resources, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.

Company Info

Founded 2006
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate N/A
Avg. Project Cost $40,000+
Client Rating 4.3/5 (11 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.4
Schedule
4.3
Cost
4.3
Communication
4.2