WeDoWebApps

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.6/5 (12 reviews)
+17862454146 milan@wedowebapps.com Visit Website

About WeDoWebApps

It is enthusiastic about mobile app development and design, and they always try to develop a tailored solution for your professional demand. They pride themselves on the standard of their work and a light each detail in building all their websites as user-friendly and responsive to prove that your site works equally well on a platform all browsers and across all desktop platforms.

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development UI-UX Design Web Design E-commerce Development Social Media Marketing SEO Android App Development Internet Marketing

Industries Served

Insurance Automotive

WeDoWebApps Reviews

Write a Review

ERP rollout that went live on the agreed date — we know how significant that is

Aarav Mehta / Chief Data Officer - Zenith FinServ Ltd
Verified
Jan 08, 2026

Project summary: First notice of loss processing was taking three days on average. Market benchmarks were under four hours. Automation of the intake and triage workflow was the agreed priority.

We had worked with three agencies before this engagement. The comparison is not flattering to the others. What distinguished this team was a systematic approach to understanding the problem before proposing a solution — something that sounds obvious and is practiced far less often than it should be. The delivery phase ran to schedule, the codebase is clean enough that our internal engineers made positive comments during handover review, and we have not logged a critical incident in five months of live operation. We intend to use them for our next phase of work.

PROS

Commercially transparent throughout — no hidden assumptions, no bill shock at the end, change requests that were fair and clearly explained rather than used as a margin-recovery mechanism

CONS

Pipeline availability for kickoff required a few weeks of lead time — in hindsight that selection pressure means you are working with a team that is in demand for the right reasons

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.0
Schedule
4.0
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeERP Development
IndustryInsurance
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationJun 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As Chief Data Officer at Zenith FinServ Ltd I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Insurance operations in Bangalore, India. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
We had a defined product vision for our next phase of growth in the Insurance market but lacked the engineering depth internally to execute it. The ERP Development requirements in particular required specialist experience that we could not realistically recruit for on the timeline our business plan required.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end ERP Development delivery with particular depth in the integration and data migration components, which were the highest-risk elements of the programme. They supplemented this with a dedicated QA resource throughout development and a documented runbook for our operations team at handover.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
A trusted peer in the Insurance sector had used them for a comparable ERP Development engagement and their recommendation was unequivocal. Our own due diligence confirmed the pattern they described. The combination of domain knowledge, ERP Development depth, and demonstrated delivery discipline was the deciding factor.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Better than we managed ourselves going in. The workshops they facilitated surfaced assumptions we had not examined and exposed three requirements that were in direct conflict with each other. Resolving those before development began saved us what would certainly have been significant rework later in the project.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management framework was the most structured I have experienced with an external vendor. Sprint planning was tight, acceptance criteria were specific, retrospectives were honest and acted on. The project manager treated the shared backlog as a live document and the risk register as an operational tool rather than a compliance artefact. I never had to ask for a status update.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the approved budget. The estimation accuracy was notable — they had broken the work down in sufficient detail during discovery that their forecast proved reliable throughout, rather than being a number that shifted with every change in scope. We received one change request and it was for scope we had introduced ourselves.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live four months ago. User adoption exceeded the target we had set by 23 percent in the first month. Support ticket volume has dropped measurably. The features we had deferred because the previous architecture made them prohibitively expensive to build are now in development. The platform they built has opened our roadmap.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without reservation. I have already made two direct referrals within my Insurance network — in both cases to peers facing ERP Development challenges similar to ours. I gave those referrals with confidence because I knew the experience I described was reproducible, not the result of exceptional circumstances on our engagement.

Project delivered with the kind of professionalism that earns a long-term relationship

Brandon Hayes / VP of Engineering - Apex Digital Partners
Verified
Nov 14, 2022

Project summary: Our dealer network management system had not been meaningfully updated in eight years and was actively impeding our ability to support our distribution partners effectively.

Our industry has specific compliance requirements that many generalist agencies struggle with. This team came with working knowledge of the relevant frameworks, asked pointed questions about our obligations, and built controls into the architecture rather than bolting them on at the end. Our compliance team reviewed the delivered system and had only minor observations, which is genuinely unusual for a first-pass review. That domain awareness saved us significant remediation cost.

PROS

Architectural decisions that will serve us for years rather than just solving the immediate problem, knowledge transfer that left our team genuinely capable, no scope creep at all

CONS

The initial project brief document they required was more detailed than we were used to providing, but in hindsight that rigour was part of why the project ran so smoothly

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeEmbedded Systems Development
IndustryAutomotive
Project Cost$150,000 to $499,999
DurationOct 2024 – Mar 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Apex Digital Partners, a mid-sized organisation in the Automotive sector headquartered in San Francisco, USA. My remit as VP of Engineering covers everything from infrastructure to product development. We had reached a point where our internal engineering capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap without an experienced external partner.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Growth into new markets had exposed serious limitations in our platform. What had worked for our original user base in San Francisco, USA was not going to scale internationally, and the Embedded Systems Development requirements for those new markets were meaningfully different. We needed a partner who had solved that kind of problem before.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end Embedded Systems Development delivery with a particular emphasis on the integration layer that connected the new build to our existing Automotive infrastructure. They also provided UI/UX input that was not in the original scope but which they offered proactively because they could see it would affect adoption. That kind of initiative was characteristic of how they approached the whole engagement.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We evaluated four vendors in total. Two were eliminated after the technical assessment stage because their proposed architectures showed a surface-level understanding of what we needed. This team's proposal demonstrated genuine depth in Embedded Systems Development and specific knowledge of the Automotive sector that the others could not match. The reference calls confirmed a consistent pattern of delivery.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thorough and precise. They translated our business language into technical requirements without losing the intent, which is a skill that sounds straightforward but frequently goes wrong. Every user story they wrote was reviewed against the original business objective before it entered the sprint and the acceptance criteria were specific enough to remove subjectivity from QA.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was handled primarily asynchronously given the time zone difference between San Francisco, USA and the team's base, but it was managed so well that the gap rarely felt like a constraint. Written updates were clear and timely, escalations were handled promptly, and we never had to chase for a status update. The cadence was exactly right — enough to feel informed, not so much that it created overhead.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I will note that the original timeline was aggressive and I had privately expected a slip. They managed to hold it by making smart sequencing decisions early on that I only fully understood in retrospect. The budget discipline was equally good — we received a single change request for scope we had introduced ourselves and it was priced fairly.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Hard to isolate precisely because several factors changed simultaneously, but the data we can attribute directly to the new Embedded Systems Development platform shows a meaningful improvement in the metrics that matter to our Automotive business. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations, which was one of the strategic objectives we started with.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some agencies disappear the moment the final invoice is paid. This team maintained the same level of responsiveness during the hypercare period as during development, handed over thorough documentation without being asked twice, and checked in proactively a month after go-live to review performance metrics with us. That last part was entirely unprompted.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. The referral I would give comes with context: they are not the cheapest option and they are not the fastest to schedule. If you are optimising purely on price or looking for someone to start tomorrow, there are other choices. If you want the work done properly and a partner you can trust with a complex, high-stakes Embedded Systems Development engagement, this team is the answer.

FAQs

How much does it cost to hire WeDoWebApps?
The cost of hiring WeDoWebApps depends on factors such as project complexity, development hours, required technologies, team size, and engagement model. Based on available data, WeDoWebApps's typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49, with an average project cost of $50000+.
What technologies does WeDoWebApps specialize in?
Depending on the project requirements, WeDoWebApps may work with technologies such as React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, iOS, Android, AWS, Azure, AI, and cloud platforms. For context, it has served clients in USA, and it has experience across industries such as Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Automotive, Environmental Services, Fashion & Apparel, Government & Public Sector and Travel & Hospitality.
How long does WeDoWebApps take to complete a software project?
Project timelines vary depending on scope and complexity. A simple MVP may take a few weeks, while enterprise software or large-scale digital transformation projects can require several months of development, testing, and deployment. With a team of 10 - 49 professionals, WeDoWebApps can scale resources based on project urgency.
How do I choose the right software development company?
When selecting a software development company like WeDoWebApps, consider its portfolio, client reviews, industry expertise, technical capabilities, communication process, pricing model, project management approach, and post-launch support. For context, its listed capabilities span Android App Development, E-commerce Development, Internet Marketing, Mobile App Development and SEO, and its average project cost is reported at $50000+.
Is WeDoWebApps an offshore software development company?
WeDoWebApps may operate as an offshore, onshore, or hybrid software development company depending on its location and the markets it serves. For context, its listed capabilities span Android App Development, E-commerce Development, Internet Marketing, Mobile App Development and SEO, and it has served clients in USA.
Does WeDoWebApps offer dedicated developers?
Yes, many companies like WeDoWebApps provide a dedicated developer hiring model, allowing businesses to scale their in-house team with experienced professionals who work exclusively on their project. For context, its listed capabilities span Android App Development, E-commerce Development, Internet Marketing, Mobile App Development and SEO, and its average project cost is reported at $50000+.
What engagement models does WeDoWebApps provide?
WeDoWebApps may offer multiple engagement models such as fixed-price contracts, dedicated team hiring, and time-and-material billing, allowing businesses to choose the option that best fits their budget and project scope. For context, it has experience across industries such as Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Automotive, Environmental Services, Fashion & Apparel, Government & Public Sector and Travel & Hospitality, and it has served clients in USA.
Does WeDoWebApps develop SaaS products?
Yes, WeDoWebApps may offer SaaS product development services, including multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing integration, and cloud-native deployment for scalable software-as-a-service solutions. For context, it has experience across industries such as Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Automotive, Environmental Services, Fashion & Apparel, Government & Public Sector and Travel & Hospitality, and its average project cost is reported at $50000+.
What is WeDoWebApps's software development process?
WeDoWebApps typically follows a structured software development process that may include requirement analysis, UI/UX design, agile development sprints, quality assurance testing, deployment, and post-launch support. For context, it has experience across industries such as Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Automotive, Environmental Services, Fashion & Apparel, Government & Public Sector and Travel & Hospitality, and it has served clients in USA.
How do I request a proposal from WeDoWebApps?
You can request a proposal from WeDoWebApps by submitting your project requirements through its website contact form, email, or by reaching out directly to discuss your business goals and receive a tailored development estimate. For context, its listed capabilities span Android App Development, E-commerce Development, Internet Marketing, Mobile App Development and SEO, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.

Company Info

Founded 2015
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate $25 - $49
Avg. Project Cost $25,000+
Client Rating 4.6/5 (12 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.6
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.6
Communication
4.6