3 SIDED CUBE

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.4/5 (12 reviews)
+441202611612 holla@3sidedcube.com Visit Website

About 3 SIDED CUBE

3 Sided Cube is a multi-award winning digital company based in the UK, helping communities, businesses, and organizations over the world. They collaborate with your very best people and real end users to find solutions that are fit for purpose. This will offer you an opportunity to add new features and functionalities to your app, which obviously is an advantage in the digital curve.

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development Wearable App Development UI-UX Design Web Design

Industries Served

Manufacturing Energy & Utilities

3 SIDED CUBE Reviews

Write a Review

Analytics dashboard that our executives open before their morning coffee

Courtney Walsh / Director of eCommerce - Summit Retail Group
Verified
Feb 14, 2024

Project summary: Production downtime was costing us significantly each quarter and our existing monitoring infrastructure had no predictive capability whatsoever.

I am a demanding client. I have a technical background, I review code, and I have high standards for documentation and testing. This team met all of those expectations without ever seeming defensive about scrutiny. Peer code reviews were welcomed, unit test coverage was genuine rather than performative, and the API documentation was thorough enough that our own developers integrated against it without a single clarification call. That level of craft is what I look for and rarely find.

PROS

Architectural decisions that will serve us for years rather than just solving the immediate problem, knowledge transfer that left our team genuinely capable, no scope creep at all

CONS

Their calendar books up quickly which made scheduling the initial kickoff slightly challenging — a good problem for them to have and not one that affected our delivery

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeData & Analytics
IndustryManufacturing
Project Cost$500,000+
DurationJan 2025 – Jun 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As Director of eCommerce at Summit Retail Group, I manage a cross-functional technology team serving our Manufacturing clients from New York, USA. We are a commercially focused organisation and every technology decision we make is evaluated against a clear business case. We needed a partner who understood that context, not just the technical brief.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Growth into new markets had exposed serious limitations in our platform. What had worked for our original user base in New York, USA was not going to scale internationally, and the Data & Analytics requirements for those new markets were meaningfully different. We needed a partner who had solved that kind of problem before.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The full Data & Analytics lifecycle from discovery through to production deployment and hypercare support. This included requirements workshops, solution architecture, sprint-based development, QA and automated testing, deployment to our cloud environment, and a structured handover with documentation. They also provided a brief post-launch period of dedicated support which was genuinely useful.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
Their portfolio included two projects that were sufficiently close to our own brief in terms of complexity, Data & Analytics scope, and Manufacturing context that we felt confident they understood what we were asking. The proposal was technically rigorous, the pricing was transparent, and the proposed team structure gave us senior engineers throughout rather than just for the pitch.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thorough and precise. They translated our business language into technical requirements without losing the intent, which is a skill that sounds straightforward but frequently goes wrong. Every user story they wrote was reviewed against the original business objective before it entered the sprint and the acceptance criteria were specific enough to remove subjectivity from QA.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. I have worked with agencies that communicate beautifully during the sales process and go quiet during delivery. This was the opposite — structured, consistent, and genuinely informative throughout. Problems were surfaced early with proposed solutions rather than just problem statements, which made the inevitable mid-project decisions much easier to make.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I will note that the original timeline was aggressive and I had privately expected a slip. They managed to hold it by making smart sequencing decisions early on that I only fully understood in retrospect. The budget discipline was equally good — we received a single change request for scope we had introduced ourselves and it was priced fairly.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantitatively: user engagement metrics are up significantly since launch, our support ticket volume has dropped, and we have received unsolicited positive feedback from clients who noticed the improvement. Qualitatively: our internal team is proud of the product we now have, which affects morale and retention in ways that do not show up on a dashboard but matter enormously.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The intellectual honesty. They told us when something we wanted was a bad idea and explained why. They told us when a timeline was tight and gave us options. They did not tell us what we wanted to hear in order to win work or avoid a difficult conversation. In a long engagement that kind of relationship is far more valuable than an agency that just says yes.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
I recommend them to anyone who asks and occasionally to people who do not. The combination of Data & Analytics expertise, Manufacturing domain knowledge, and delivery discipline is genuinely difficult to find. We found it here and we intend to keep it.

Project delivered with the kind of professionalism that earns a long-term relationship

Ciarán Murphy / CTO - Liffey Tech Solutions Ltd
Verified
Mar 05, 2022

Project summary: Smart meter rollout had generated more data than our existing analytics infrastructure could process and we were losing value that should have been translating directly into grid efficiency gains.

Project governance was one of the things that impressed me most. We had a dedicated project manager who ran tight fortnightly sprints with clear acceptance criteria, a shared backlog that gave us full visibility at all times, and a change request process that was fair and transparent. Nothing slipped through the cracks, no bill shock at the end, and the final delivery matched the original scope document almost perfectly. In my experience that kind of discipline is genuinely uncommon.

PROS

Business-aware approach to every technical decision, strong project governance, fast turnaround on feedback, zero drama during a genuinely complex engagement

CONS

Their calendar books up quickly which made scheduling the initial kickoff slightly challenging — a good problem for them to have and not one that affected our delivery

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeLow-Code / No-Code Development
IndustryEnergy & Utilities
Project Cost$150,000 to $499,999
DurationDec 2024 – Feb 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Liffey Tech Solutions Ltd operates across the Energy & Utilities sector with offices in Dublin, Ireland. In my capacity as CTO I oversee both the strategic and operational technology agenda. We are a growth-stage business that needed a development partner capable of scaling with us rather than constraining us.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our existing Low-Code / No-Code Development capability had accumulated years of technical debt that was slowing every new feature to a crawl. Incident frequency was rising, developer confidence was falling, and we knew a rebuild was overdue. We needed a partner with the depth to do it properly rather than apply another layer of patches.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The full Low-Code / No-Code Development lifecycle from discovery through to production deployment and hypercare support. This included requirements workshops, solution architecture, sprint-based development, QA and automated testing, deployment to our cloud environment, and a structured handover with documentation. They also provided a brief post-launch period of dedicated support which was genuinely useful.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
A direct referral from a peer who had used them for a comparable Low-Code / No-Code Development engagement in the Energy & Utilities space. That peer's experience had been excellent and their project profile was similar enough to ours that the recommendation carried real weight. Everything we found during our own evaluation reinforced that this was the right decision.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
The requirements understanding was solid from early on, aided by the fact that they had prior experience in the Energy & Utilities sector and did not need us to explain domain context that a less experienced team would have required. That background knowledge shortened the discovery phase meaningfully and reduced the volume of clarification questions during sprints.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. I have worked with agencies that communicate beautifully during the sales process and go quiet during delivery. This was the opposite — structured, consistent, and genuinely informative throughout. Problems were surfaced early with proposed solutions rather than just problem statements, which made the inevitable mid-project decisions much easier to make.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the agreed budget. They had given us a range estimate at the start, which I had been sceptical of, and they landed within the lower half of that range. Their estimation accuracy came from having broken the work down in genuine detail during discovery rather than giving a rough number and hoping. It showed in every sprint.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is that the problem we hired them to solve no longer exists. Beyond that, the new Low-Code / No-Code Development platform has reduced our operational overhead measurably, our team spends less time managing incidents and more time on product development, and we have been able to onboard two new enterprise clients who had previously cited our technical limitations as a barrier.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who scoped the work were the engineers who built it. That sounds like it should be standard practice but in my experience it often is not. The institutional knowledge that comes from that continuity pays dividends at every stage, particularly when you are dealing with a complex Energy & Utilities domain where context takes time to build.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. I would recommend them with a specific note that the quality of the discovery process is where the value starts. Clients who invest properly in that phase will get the most out of the engagement. We made that investment and the returns are evident in the quality of what was delivered.

FAQs

How much does it cost to hire 3 SIDED CUBE?
The cost of hiring 3 SIDED CUBE depends on factors such as project complexity, development hours, required technologies, team size, and engagement model. Based on available data, 3 SIDED CUBE 's typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149, with an average project cost of $10000+.
How long does 3 SIDED CUBE take to complete a software project?
Project timelines vary depending on scope and complexity. A simple MVP may take a few weeks, while enterprise software or large-scale digital transformation projects can require several months of development, testing, and deployment. With a team of 10 - 49 professionals, 3 SIDED CUBE can scale resources based on project urgency.
Why should businesses choose 3 SIDED CUBE?
Businesses may choose 3 SIDED CUBE based on factors such as technical expertise, industry experience, client reviews, development methodology, communication practices, and the ability to deliver scalable software solutions that align with business objectives. Founded in 2009, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
Does 3 SIDED CUBE provide post-launch support and maintenance?
Many software development companies, including 3 SIDED CUBE, offer ongoing maintenance, bug fixes, performance optimization, security updates, feature enhancements, and technical support after project deployment. For context, its listed capabilities span Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design, Wearable App Development, Web Design and Web Development, and it has been operating since 2009.
How do I choose the right software development company?
When selecting a software development company like 3 SIDED CUBE, consider its portfolio, client reviews, industry expertise, technical capabilities, communication process, pricing model, project management approach, and post-launch support. For context, it has served clients in USA, and its typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149.
What engagement models does 3 SIDED CUBE provide?
3 SIDED CUBE may offer multiple engagement models such as fixed-price contracts, dedicated team hiring, and time-and-material billing, allowing businesses to choose the option that best fits their budget and project scope. For context, its listed capabilities span Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design, Wearable App Development, Web Design and Web Development, and it has experience across industries such as Gaming & Gambling, Energy & Utilities, Environmental Services, Manufacturing, Legal Services and Mining & Metals.
Which countries does 3 SIDED CUBE serve?
3 SIDED CUBE may serve clients across multiple countries and regions, including USA, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
Does 3 SIDED CUBE develop SaaS products?
Yes, 3 SIDED CUBE may offer SaaS product development services, including multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing integration, and cloud-native deployment for scalable software-as-a-service solutions. For context, it has experience across industries such as Gaming & Gambling, Energy & Utilities, Environmental Services, Manufacturing, Legal Services and Mining & Metals, and its listed capabilities span Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design, Wearable App Development, Web Design and Web Development.
Can 3 SIDED CUBE modernize legacy software?
3 SIDED CUBE may provide legacy software modernization services, including re-platforming, code refactoring, and migration to modern frameworks or cloud infrastructure to improve performance and maintainability. For context, it has experience across industries such as Gaming & Gambling, Energy & Utilities, Environmental Services, Manufacturing, Legal Services and Mining & Metals, and its average project cost is reported at $10000+.
How do I request a proposal from 3 SIDED CUBE?
You can request a proposal from 3 SIDED CUBE by submitting your project requirements through its website contact form, email, or by reaching out directly to discuss your business goals and receive a tailored development estimate. For context, it has experience across industries such as Gaming & Gambling, Energy & Utilities, Environmental Services, Manufacturing, Legal Services and Mining & Metals, and its average project cost is reported at $10000+.

Company Info

Founded 2009
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate $100 - $149
Avg. Project Cost $45,000+
Client Rating 4.4/5 (12 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.4
Schedule
4.3
Cost
4.4
Communication
4.5