Blueberry Consultants

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.5/5 (12 reviews)
+441212856404 enquiries-contact@bbconsult.co.uk Visit Website

About Blueberry Consultants

Their mission is to resolve challenging technical problems in partnership with its clients. They understand the business requirements of its clients, and how technology can be used as a tool to make modern businesses more effective. Their experience crosses the full range of custom software development, from small entrepreneurial project to difficult systems for major corporations.

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development UI-UX Design Custom Software Development Web Design Logo Designing Cloud Solutions

Industries Served

Energy & Utilities Healthcare

Blueberry Consultants Reviews

Write a Review

SEO work that moved our primary keywords from page two to position three in five months

Radosław Kowalczyk / Head of Development - Wisła Software Sp zoo
Verified
Mar 07, 2026

Project summary: Our field service management system had not been updated significantly in six years. Rising technician count and increasing job complexity had exposed every one of its limitations.

The integration layer was the part of the project I was most concerned about going in. Our system landscape is complex, several of the upstream APIs we relied on were poorly documented, and two third-party vendors had a history of unpredictable response times on integration questions. This team managed all of that. They documented what the upstream vendors could not, built resilience into the integration architecture where the upstream behaviour was unreliable, and delivered a solution that works as specified in production. I could not have asked for more.

PROS

Architectural decisions designed for longevity rather than just the current brief, thorough automated test coverage, post-launch stability that validated every technical choice made during discovery

CONS

Their insistence on a detailed functional specification before development began felt like friction at the time. In retrospect, it was the reason the development phase ran without the ambiguity that has derailed similar projects for us previously

4.5
Overall
5.0
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.5
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeDigital Marketing
IndustryEnergy & Utilities
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationOct 2025 – Jan 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Wisła Software Sp zoo, a growth-stage Energy & Utilities business based in Warsaw, Poland. As Head of Development my remit spans product engineering, platform operations, and strategic vendor partnerships. We had reached an inflection point where our internal capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap at the pace our market required.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
We had a defined product vision for our next phase of growth in the Energy & Utilities market but lacked the engineering depth internally to execute it. The Digital Marketing requirements in particular required specialist experience that we could not realistically recruit for on the timeline our business plan required.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily Digital Marketing, with adjacent work in solution architecture and quality assurance. They were responsible for the full build from requirements through to go-live, including integration with four existing systems in our technology landscape. The breadth they covered without requiring additional vendors was commercially and logistically valuable.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thoroughly and precisely. The requirements document they produced was detailed enough that our QA team used it directly to write acceptance criteria. Every user story had a defined business objective attached. Nothing was left to interpretation. That discipline in the requirements phase paid dividends throughout development and testing.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the approved budget. The estimation accuracy was notable — they had broken the work down in sufficient detail during discovery that their forecast proved reliable throughout, rather than being a number that shifted with every change in scope. We received one change request and it was for scope we had introduced ourselves.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live four months ago. User adoption exceeded the target we had set by 23 percent in the first month. Support ticket volume has dropped measurably. The features we had deferred because the previous architecture made them prohibitively expensive to build are now in development. The platform they built has opened our roadmap.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The willingness to be direct. When our requirements were unclear they said so. When our priorities were contradictory they explained why. When a technical approach we had assumed was the right one turned out to have significant downsides, they told us before we had committed to it. That kind of intellectual honesty is what I look for in a long-term technology partner.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without reservation. I have already made two direct referrals within my Energy & Utilities network — in both cases to peers facing Digital Marketing challenges similar to ours. I gave those referrals with confidence because I knew the experience I described was reproducible, not the result of exceptional circumstances on our engagement.

A technology investment that delivered returns ahead of the business case we approved

Marcus Holloway / SVP of Engineering - Vertex Cloud Dynamics
Verified
Jan 28, 2026

Project summary: Integration between our clinic management system and our patient-facing app had been a recurring failure point. We needed an engineering partner who could own the integration layer end to end.

We gave this team an aggressive timeline, a technically complex scope, and a client-side project team that was stretched thin and not always available at the speed the engagement required. They absorbed all of that gracefully. Where they needed input they were precise about what they needed and when. Where they could proceed independently they did. The result was a delivery that landed on time despite the constraints on our side, which I regard as evidence of genuine professional maturity.

PROS

Delivery timeline that proved achievable rather than optimistic, estimation accuracy that reflected real analysis rather than competitive bidding, scope discipline that prevented the feature creep we had experienced before

CONS

The quality of documentation they produce means our team needed to set aside dedicated review time to do it justice — a minor scheduling point rather than a genuine criticism

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
5.0
Schedule
4.0
Cost
4.0
Communication
Project TypeIndustry-Specific Solutions
IndustryHealthcare
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationMar 2025 – Oct 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As SVP of Engineering at Vertex Cloud Dynamics I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Healthcare operations in Austin, USA. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
We had a defined product vision for our next phase of growth in the Healthcare market but lacked the engineering depth internally to execute it. The Industry-Specific Solutions requirements in particular required specialist experience that we could not realistically recruit for on the timeline our business plan required.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily Industry-Specific Solutions, with adjacent work in solution architecture and quality assurance. They were responsible for the full build from requirements through to go-live, including integration with four existing systems in our technology landscape. The breadth they covered without requiring additional vendors was commercially and logistically valuable.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
A trusted peer in the Healthcare sector had used them for a comparable Industry-Specific Solutions engagement and their recommendation was unequivocal. Our own due diligence confirmed the pattern they described. The combination of domain knowledge, Industry-Specific Solutions depth, and demonstrated delivery discipline was the deciding factor.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was proactive, timely, and appropriately calibrated. Technical updates for the engineering audience, executive summaries for the steering group, risk flags with proposed mitigations rather than just problem statements. The fortnightly sprint reviews gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every working session.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the approved budget. The estimation accuracy was notable — they had broken the work down in sufficient detail during discovery that their forecast proved reliable throughout, rather than being a number that shifted with every change in scope. We received one change request and it was for scope we had introduced ourselves.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live four months ago. User adoption exceeded the target we had set by 23 percent in the first month. Support ticket volume has dropped measurably. The features we had deferred because the previous architecture made them prohibitively expensive to build are now in development. The platform they built has opened our roadmap.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. With a specific note that the value starts in the discovery phase — clients who approach that process with seriousness will get the most from the engagement. We invested appropriately at the front end and the returns are evident in what was delivered.

FAQs

How much does it cost to hire Blueberry Consultants?
The cost of hiring Blueberry Consultants depends on factors such as project complexity, development hours, required technologies, team size, and engagement model. Based on available data, Blueberry Consultants's typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49, with an average project cost of $50000+.
Which industries does Blueberry Consultants serve?
Blueberry Consultants has experience working with businesses across multiple industries, including Aerospace & Defense, Education, Nonprofit & NGO, Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology and Energy & Utilities.
Is Blueberry Consultants suitable for startups?
Yes. Many startups choose companies like Blueberry Consultants because they offer MVP development, product consulting, scalable architecture, and dedicated development teams that help launch products quickly while managing development costs. For context, it has experience across industries such as Aerospace & Defense, Education, Nonprofit & NGO, Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology and Energy & Utilities, and its typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49.
What technologies does Blueberry Consultants specialize in?
Depending on the project requirements, Blueberry Consultants may work with technologies such as React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, iOS, Android, AWS, Azure, AI, and cloud platforms. For context, it has experience across industries such as Aerospace & Defense, Education, Nonprofit & NGO, Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology and Energy & Utilities, and its listed capabilities span Cloud Solutions, Custom Software Development, Logo Designing, Mobile App Development and UI-UX Design.
How long does Blueberry Consultants take to complete a software project?
Project timelines vary depending on scope and complexity. A simple MVP may take a few weeks, while enterprise software or large-scale digital transformation projects can require several months of development, testing, and deployment. With a team of 50 - 249 professionals, Blueberry Consultants can scale resources based on project urgency.
Does Blueberry Consultants provide post-launch support and maintenance?
Many software development companies, including Blueberry Consultants, offer ongoing maintenance, bug fixes, performance optimization, security updates, feature enhancements, and technical support after project deployment. For context, it has experience across industries such as Aerospace & Defense, Education, Nonprofit & NGO, Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology and Energy & Utilities, and it reports a team size of 50 - 249 professionals.
Does Blueberry Consultants sign an NDA before starting a project?
Most professional software development companies, including Blueberry Consultants, are willing to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) to protect client data and project confidentiality before development begins. For context, it has served clients in United-kingdom, and it has been operating since 1997.
Which countries does Blueberry Consultants serve?
Blueberry Consultants may serve clients across multiple countries and regions, including United-kingdom, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
Can Blueberry Consultants modernize legacy software?
Blueberry Consultants may provide legacy software modernization services, including re-platforming, code refactoring, and migration to modern frameworks or cloud infrastructure to improve performance and maintainability. For context, its listed capabilities span Cloud Solutions, Custom Software Development, Logo Designing, Mobile App Development and UI-UX Design, and its typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49.
What is Blueberry Consultants's software development process?
Blueberry Consultants typically follows a structured software development process that may include requirement analysis, UI/UX design, agile development sprints, quality assurance testing, deployment, and post-launch support. For context, it has served clients in United-kingdom, and it has experience across industries such as Aerospace & Defense, Education, Nonprofit & NGO, Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology and Energy & Utilities.

Company Info

Founded 1997
Employees 50 - 249
Hourly Rate $25 - $49
Avg. Project Cost $40,000+
Client Rating 4.5/5 (12 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.4
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.4
Communication
4.4