About Calibre Consulting
Calibre Consulting is a technology company founded in 2014. Calibre Consulting focuses on Mobile App Development. Its team includes 2 - 9 specialists working across design, development, and delivery. Typical hourly rates run around $100 - $149 / hr/hr, with an average project cost near $50,000. Calibre Consulting holds a 4.9-star rating across 15 client reviews. The team is based in Calgary, Canada. This profile is a starting point — reach out to Calibre Consulting directly to discuss project specifics.
Where We Specialize
Industry Expertise
Typical Project Size
Calibre Consulting Reviews
Write a ReviewResults that made the business case look conservative in hindsight
Allison Park / Chief Product Officer - Vertex Media IncJan 05, 2026
Project summary: Several previous vendor relationships had left us cautious. We needed a partner who would be honest about complexity upfront rather than discovering it mid-project.
Twelve weeks from kickoff to live production deployment for a project of this complexity. I would not have believed that was achievable if I had not watched them do it. The velocity came from genuine engineering discipline — clear requirements, short feedback loops, automated testing, and a team that communicated internally without the overhead that slows most agencies down. The product has been live for four months with no critical bugs and one minor patch. We are already in scoping conversations for phase two.
Domain knowledge that went beyond generic expertise into our specific industry, willingness to push back constructively, automated test coverage that gave us deployment confidence
We underestimated the internal resource commitment required on our side during discovery — the team warned us, we did not listen fully, and the first sprint was slower as a result
Questions & Answers
Zero-trust architecture that passed our enterprise client due diligence first time
Femke Hoekstra / Head of IT - Delta Logistics BVJul 19, 2022
Project summary: Underwriting decisions that should have taken minutes were taking days because of a legacy policy administration system that predated modern API architecture.
The thing I appreciate most in retrospect is that they were honest when something was harder than expected. Twice during the project the team came to us proactively to say that a particular component needed more time to do properly and explained why cutting corners would create problems later. We gave them the time. Both decisions were correct. The resulting product is solid and we have had none of the post-launch instability that plagued our last two technology projects.
Engineering quality that our internal team can maintain without calling the vendor, thorough documentation, proactive risk identification throughout the project
We underestimated the internal resource commitment required on our side during discovery — the team warned us, we did not listen fully, and the first sprint was slower as a result