Cloudsquare

Write a Review Claim this Company
5.0/5 (2 reviews)
+18333448850 hello@cloudsquare.io Visit Website

About Cloudsquare

Cloudsquare entered the market in 2017 and has since positioned itself as a specialist in emerging and cross-platform technologies. The company, staffed by a team of 10 to 49 people, offers mobile app development, cross platform app development, web development, AR app development, enterprise app modernization, and wearable app development. This mix signals a deliberate focus on helping businesses modernize legacy systems while also exploring newer interaction models like augmented reality and wearables. Cloudsquare's premium hourly rate structure reflects a positioning toward complex, higher-value engagements rather than volume-based commodity work. Its enterprise app modernization service suggests experience working with organizations that need to bring older systems up to current technical and user expectations without disrupting existing operations. By covering both traditional mobile and web development alongside AR and wearable capabilities, Cloudsquare can support clients who want a single partner across an increasingly diverse set of device categories. For businesses exploring next-generation app experiences or seeking to overhaul aging enterprise software, Cloudsquare offers a technically diverse skill set built around a decade-plus of industry evolution since its 2017 founding.

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development AR App Development Wearable App Development Enterprise App Modernization Cross Platform App Development

Industries Served

Legal Services Retail & E-commerce

Cloudsquare Reviews

Write a Review

Execution that matched the sales pitch — which is rarer than it should be

Lukas Becker / Head of Digitalisation - Becker Industrie GmbH
Verified
Nov 07, 2024

Project summary: Our client portal was a reputational liability — we needed it to reflect the same standard of professionalism our lawyers delivered in person.

The thing I appreciate most in retrospect is that they were honest when something was harder than expected. Twice during the project the team came to us proactively to say that a particular component needed more time to do properly and explained why cutting corners would create problems later. We gave them the time. Both decisions were correct. The resulting product is solid and we have had none of the post-launch instability that plagued our last two technology projects.

PROS

Senior engineers on our account throughout the entire project rather than a bait-and-switch to juniors after contract signing, transparent reporting, realistic estimates that proved accurate

CONS

We underestimated the internal resource commitment required on our side during discovery — the team warned us, we did not listen fully, and the first sprint was slower as a result

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeIndustry-Specific Solutions
IndustryLegal Services
Project Cost$500,000+
DurationSep 2025 – Feb 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Becker Industrie GmbH, a mid-sized organisation in the Legal Services sector headquartered in Munich, Germany. My remit as Head of Digitalisation covers everything from infrastructure to product development. We had reached a point where our internal engineering capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap without an experienced external partner.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate trigger was a performance failure during our peak trading period that cost us measurably in both revenue and client trust. The root cause was architectural and our internal team did not have the Industry-Specific Solutions expertise to address it properly. We needed specialists.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily Industry-Specific Solutions, though the scope naturally touched adjacent areas. They handled architecture design, implementation, integration with our existing systems, performance testing under realistic load, and knowledge transfer to our internal team. The breadth of what they covered without requiring us to bring in additional vendors was one of the reasons the project ran efficiently.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We evaluated four vendors in total. Two were eliminated after the technical assessment stage because their proposed architectures showed a surface-level understanding of what we needed. This team's proposal demonstrated genuine depth in Industry-Specific Solutions and specific knowledge of the Legal Services sector that the others could not match. The reference calls confirmed a consistent pattern of delivery.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Better than we did at the start, which sounds like an exaggeration but is genuinely accurate. The discovery workshop they ran surfaced assumptions we had not examined and contradictions in our requirements that would have caused real problems mid-development. The functional specification they produced was the clearest articulation of our product that we had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management was the best I have experienced in a vendor relationship. We had fortnightly sprint reviews with structured agendas, a shared backlog that we could inspect at any point, a risk register that was actively maintained rather than created at kickoff and never opened again, and a project manager who treated our time as something worth protecting. Communication was proactive, not reactive.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes on both counts. There was one sprint where a third-party integration took longer than scoped because of undocumented API behaviour on the vendor side. The team flagged it immediately, proposed two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the timeline within two weeks. That is how scope issues should be handled and rarely are.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantitatively: user engagement metrics are up significantly since launch, our support ticket volume has dropped, and we have received unsolicited positive feedback from clients who noticed the improvement. Qualitatively: our internal team is proud of the product we now have, which affects morale and retention in ways that do not show up on a dashboard but matter enormously.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The quality of the written communication. This matters more than most clients articulate. Clear, concise, technically accurate updates that our non-technical stakeholders could read and understand. Proposals and change requests that made the decision obvious rather than obscuring it in jargon. That communication quality reduced our internal coordination overhead significantly.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. I would recommend them with a specific note that the quality of the discovery process is where the value starts. Clients who invest properly in that phase will get the most out of the engagement. We made that investment and the returns are evident in the quality of what was delivered.

VR training module that cut onboarding time in half

Travis Bennett / Managing Director, Tech - Irongate Capital
Verified
Sep 01, 2022

Project summary: Peak season traffic had been exposing architectural weaknesses in our platform for two years. We could no longer afford to enter a promotional period hoping for the best.

The technical quality of the work is the easiest thing to praise, but what I want to highlight is the communication culture on this team. Every question got a same-day response. Every risk got flagged before it became an issue. When we needed to change direction mid-project — a business decision on our side — they absorbed the change professionally, requoted fairly, and kept momentum going. That flexibility is something you cannot assess in a proposal and it turned out to be one of the most valuable things about working with them.

PROS

Senior engineers on our account throughout the entire project rather than a bait-and-switch to juniors after contract signing, transparent reporting, realistic estimates that proved accurate

CONS

We underestimated the internal resource commitment required on our side during discovery — the team warned us, we did not listen fully, and the first sprint was slower as a result

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeAR/VR Development
IndustryRetail & E-commerce
Project Cost$50,000 to $149,999
DurationJul 2025 – Jan 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Irongate Capital is a Retail & E-commerce business based in Atlanta, USA. As Managing Director, Tech I am responsible for all technology investment decisions, vendor selection, and ensuring our digital capabilities match our growth ambitions. We operate in a competitive market where the quality of our software directly affects our ability to win and retain clients.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our Retail & E-commerce regulatory environment had changed and the compliance timeline was non-negotiable. We needed to rebuild specific components of our system to meet the new requirements and our internal team was already fully committed to the core product roadmap. Bringing in a specialist AR/VR Development partner was the only realistic path.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end AR/VR Development delivery with a particular emphasis on the integration layer that connected the new build to our existing Retail & E-commerce infrastructure. They also provided UI/UX input that was not in the original scope but which they offered proactively because they could see it would affect adoption. That kind of initiative was characteristic of how they approached the whole engagement.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
Honestly, the quality of the questions they asked during the briefing process set them apart. Most vendors listen to the brief and come back with a solution to exactly what you described. This team came back with a solution to what we actually needed, which turned out to be somewhat different. That kind of consultative instinct is what we were looking for.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thorough and precise. They translated our business language into technical requirements without losing the intent, which is a skill that sounds straightforward but frequently goes wrong. Every user story they wrote was reviewed against the original business objective before it entered the sprint and the acceptance criteria were specific enough to remove subjectivity from QA.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. We used a shared project management tool that gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every meeting. The project manager had a clear escalation path and used it appropriately. The only time I needed to intervene directly was when I chose to, not because something had been missed.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the agreed budget. They had given us a range estimate at the start, which I had been sceptical of, and they landed within the lower half of that range. Their estimation accuracy came from having broken the work down in genuine detail during discovery rather than giving a rough number and hoping. It showed in every sprint.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantitatively: user engagement metrics are up significantly since launch, our support ticket volume has dropped, and we have received unsolicited positive feedback from clients who noticed the improvement. Qualitatively: our internal team is proud of the product we now have, which affects morale and retention in ways that do not show up on a dashboard but matter enormously.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their ability to hold the business objective in mind alongside the technical task. I have worked with technically excellent agencies who lost the thread of what we were actually trying to achieve. This team never did. Every architectural decision, every trade-off conversation, every prioritisation discussion was anchored to the outcome we had agreed at the start.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. The referral I would give comes with context: they are not the cheapest option and they are not the fastest to schedule. If you are optimising purely on price or looking for someone to start tomorrow, there are other choices. If you want the work done properly and a partner you can trust with a complex, high-stakes AR/VR Development engagement, this team is the answer.

FAQs

What services does Cloudsquare offer?
Cloudsquare provides software development services that may include mobile app development, web development, custom software development, UI/UX design, cloud solutions, AI development, and enterprise application development. Its core focus areas include Mobile App Development, Cross Platform App Development, Web Development, AR App Development and Enterprise App Modernization.
Which industries does Cloudsquare serve?
Cloudsquare has experience working with businesses across multiple industries, including Legal Services and Retail & E-commerce.
How long does Cloudsquare take to complete a software project?
Project timelines vary depending on scope and complexity. A simple MVP may take a few weeks, while enterprise software or large-scale digital transformation projects can require several months of development, testing, and deployment. With a team of 10 - 49 professionals, Cloudsquare can scale resources based on project urgency.
Why should businesses choose Cloudsquare?
Businesses may choose Cloudsquare based on factors such as technical expertise, industry experience, client reviews, development methodology, communication practices, and the ability to deliver scalable software solutions that align with business objectives. Founded in 2017, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
Does Cloudsquare provide post-launch support and maintenance?
Many software development companies, including Cloudsquare, offer ongoing maintenance, bug fixes, performance optimization, security updates, feature enhancements, and technical support after project deployment. For context, its listed capabilities span Mobile App Development, Cross Platform App Development, Web Development, AR App Development and Enterprise App Modernization, and it has been operating since 2017.
What engagement models does Cloudsquare provide?
Cloudsquare may offer multiple engagement models such as fixed-price contracts, dedicated team hiring, and time-and-material billing, allowing businesses to choose the option that best fits their budget and project scope. For context, it has experience across industries such as Legal Services and Retail & E-commerce, and its listed capabilities span Mobile App Development, Cross Platform App Development, Web Development, AR App Development and Enterprise App Modernization.
Can Cloudsquare build AI-powered applications?
Many modern software development companies, including Cloudsquare, offer AI and machine learning integration services such as chatbots, predictive analytics, computer vision, and intelligent automation. For context, its listed capabilities span Mobile App Development, Cross Platform App Development, Web Development, AR App Development and Enterprise App Modernization, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
Does Cloudsquare sign an NDA before starting a project?
Most professional software development companies, including Cloudsquare, are willing to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) to protect client data and project confidentiality before development begins. For context, it has experience across industries such as Legal Services and Retail & E-commerce, and it has been operating since 2017.
Does Cloudsquare develop SaaS products?
Yes, Cloudsquare may offer SaaS product development services, including multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing integration, and cloud-native deployment for scalable software-as-a-service solutions. For context, it has experience across industries such as Legal Services and Retail & E-commerce, and its listed capabilities span Mobile App Development, Cross Platform App Development, Web Development, AR App Development and Enterprise App Modernization.
How do I request a proposal from Cloudsquare?
You can request a proposal from Cloudsquare by submitting your project requirements through its website contact form, email, or by reaching out directly to discuss your business goals and receive a tailored development estimate. For context, it has experience across industries such as Legal Services and Retail & E-commerce, and its average project cost is reported at $50000+.

Company Info

Founded 2017
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate $150 - $199
Avg. Project Cost $50,000+
Client Rating 5.0/5 (2 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
5.0