Contivio

Write a Review Claim this Company
5.0/5 (2 reviews)
+18002828105 support@contivio.com Visit Website

About Contivio

Contivio has built its practice since 2003 with a team of 10 to 49 professionals, offering one of the broader service portfolios in this comparison. The company covers mobile app development, cross platform app development, IoT app development, VR app development, Unity 3D game development, UI-UX design, and wearable app development, touching nearly every major mobile-adjacent technology category from connected devices through immersive virtual reality and interactive gaming. Hourly rates of $50 to $99 keep Contivio accessible, while an average project cost around five million dollars suggests the firm regularly takes on large, resource-intensive engagements despite its moderate hourly pricing, pointing to efficient project management on sizable initiatives. More than two decades in business have likely given Contivio exposure to multiple waves of mobile technology, from early cross-platform development through today's virtual reality and wearable device integrations. Its consistent inclusion of UI-UX design across such a wide service list suggests design is treated as foundational rather than incidental to every engagement. For organizations pursuing ambitious, multi-technology roadmaps spanning IoT, VR, gaming, and wearables within a single sustained partnership, Contivio presents a genuinely comprehensive and experienced option in the mobile and immersive technology space.

Services

Mobile App Development VR App Development Unity 3D Game Development Wearable App Development IoT App Development UI-UX Design Cross Platform App Development

Industries Served

Gaming & Gambling Advertising & Marketing

Contivio Reviews

Write a Review

Accessibility-first redesign that expanded our user base significantly

Noura Al-Rashidi / VP of Technology - Gulf Retail Holdings
Verified
Sep 01, 2025

Project summary: The project had both a hard delivery date tied to a board commitment and a scope that our previous agency had told us was not achievable. We needed someone to prove otherwise.

We ran a structured RFP with seven vendors. Three made it to the technical evaluation stage. This team won on the strength of their technical proposal, their domain knowledge, and frankly on the quality of the questions they asked us during the process. A vendor who asks good questions in the sales phase tends to ask good questions during delivery too. That hypothesis proved correct. The project is now live, performing above the KPIs we agreed, and our stakeholders are genuinely impressed.

PROS

Engineering quality that our internal team can maintain without calling the vendor, thorough documentation, proactive risk identification throughout the project

CONS

The volume of quality documentation they produced was genuinely impressive but also meant our team needed dedicated time to review it properly — a minor process point, not a complaint

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeUI/UX Design
IndustryGaming & Gambling
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationOct 2024 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Gulf Retail Holdings, a mid-sized organisation in the Gaming & Gambling sector headquartered in Abu Dhabi, UAE. My remit as VP of Technology covers everything from infrastructure to product development. We had reached a point where our internal engineering capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap without an experienced external partner.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our existing UI/UX Design capability had accumulated years of technical debt that was slowing every new feature to a crawl. Incident frequency was rising, developer confidence was falling, and we knew a rebuild was overdue. We needed a partner with the depth to do it properly rather than apply another layer of patches.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The full UI/UX Design lifecycle from discovery through to production deployment and hypercare support. This included requirements workshops, solution architecture, sprint-based development, QA and automated testing, deployment to our cloud environment, and a structured handover with documentation. They also provided a brief post-launch period of dedicated support which was genuinely useful.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
Price was a factor but not the deciding one. They were mid-range in our evaluation. What tipped it was the combination of their technical depth in UI/UX Design, the seniority of the team they proposed to assign to our account, and the clarity of their project governance model. We had been burned by an agency that overpromised before and we needed to see evidence of process maturity.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Extremely well. They asked detailed questions, challenged vague requirements until they were specific, and proposed sensible defaults for decisions we had not yet made rather than just leaving them open. By the time development started there was no ambiguity in the backlog, which is a rare starting position.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management was the best I have experienced in a vendor relationship. We had fortnightly sprint reviews with structured agendas, a shared backlog that we could inspect at any point, a risk register that was actively maintained rather than created at kickoff and never opened again, and a project manager who treated our time as something worth protecting. Communication was proactive, not reactive.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the agreed budget. They had given us a range estimate at the start, which I had been sceptical of, and they landed within the lower half of that range. Their estimation accuracy came from having broken the work down in genuine detail during discovery rather than giving a rough number and hoping. It showed in every sprint.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The ROI case we presented to our board assumed a payback period of eighteen months. Based on current trajectory we will hit that in under a year. The efficiency gains in our Gaming & Gambling operations have been more significant than the model projected, partly because the quality of the data coming out of the new system is enabling decisions we could not make before.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their ability to hold the business objective in mind alongside the technical task. I have worked with technically excellent agencies who lost the thread of what we were actually trying to achieve. This team never did. Every architectural decision, every trade-off conversation, every prioritisation discussion was anchored to the outcome we had agreed at the start.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active conversation about the next phase of work and I expect this to become a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Gaming & Gambling space looking for a UI/UX Design partner who combines technical rigour with genuine commercial awareness, I would put this team at the top of the shortlist.

Test automation suite that gives our team confidence to deploy on a Friday

Divya Nair / Director of Technology - BrightPath EdTech
Verified
Sep 16, 2022

Project summary: Our creative production workflow was entirely manual and we were spending more time on process administration than on ideas — automation was long overdue.

I am a demanding client. I have a technical background, I review code, and I have high standards for documentation and testing. This team met all of those expectations without ever seeming defensive about scrutiny. Peer code reviews were welcomed, unit test coverage was genuine rather than performative, and the API documentation was thorough enough that our own developers integrated against it without a single clarification call. That level of craft is what I look for and rarely find.

PROS

Engineering quality that our internal team can maintain without calling the vendor, thorough documentation, proactive risk identification throughout the project

CONS

Premium pricing compared to some of the alternatives we evaluated, but the quality of the output and the absence of rework costs made the investment straightforward to justify

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeQuality Assurance & Testing
IndustryAdvertising & Marketing
Project Cost$500,000+
DurationJan 2025 – Apr 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As Director of Technology at BrightPath EdTech, I manage a cross-functional technology team serving our Advertising & Marketing clients from Pune, India. We are a commercially focused organisation and every technology decision we make is evaluated against a clear business case. We needed a partner who understood that context, not just the technical brief.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our existing Quality Assurance & Testing capability had accumulated years of technical debt that was slowing every new feature to a crawl. Incident frequency was rising, developer confidence was falling, and we knew a rebuild was overdue. We needed a partner with the depth to do it properly rather than apply another layer of patches.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end Quality Assurance & Testing delivery with a particular emphasis on the integration layer that connected the new build to our existing Advertising & Marketing infrastructure. They also provided UI/UX input that was not in the original scope but which they offered proactively because they could see it would affect adoption. That kind of initiative was characteristic of how they approached the whole engagement.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
Their portfolio included two projects that were sufficiently close to our own brief in terms of complexity, Quality Assurance & Testing scope, and Advertising & Marketing context that we felt confident they understood what we were asking. The proposal was technically rigorous, the pricing was transparent, and the proposed team structure gave us senior engineers throughout rather than just for the pitch.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Extremely well. They asked detailed questions, challenged vague requirements until they were specific, and proposed sensible defaults for decisions we had not yet made rather than just leaving them open. By the time development started there was no ambiguity in the backlog, which is a rare starting position.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. I have worked with agencies that communicate beautifully during the sales process and go quiet during delivery. This was the opposite — structured, consistent, and genuinely informative throughout. Problems were surfaced early with proposed solutions rather than just problem statements, which made the inevitable mid-project decisions much easier to make.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes on both counts. There was one sprint where a third-party integration took longer than scoped because of undocumented API behaviour on the vendor side. The team flagged it immediately, proposed two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the timeline within two weeks. That is how scope issues should be handled and rarely are.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Hard to isolate precisely because several factors changed simultaneously, but the data we can attribute directly to the new Quality Assurance & Testing platform shows a meaningful improvement in the metrics that matter to our Advertising & Marketing business. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations, which was one of the strategic objectives we started with.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The quality of the written communication. This matters more than most clients articulate. Clear, concise, technically accurate updates that our non-technical stakeholders could read and understand. Proposals and change requests that made the decision obvious rather than obscuring it in jargon. That communication quality reduced our internal coordination overhead significantly.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. The referral I would give comes with context: they are not the cheapest option and they are not the fastest to schedule. If you are optimising purely on price or looking for someone to start tomorrow, there are other choices. If you want the work done properly and a partner you can trust with a complex, high-stakes Quality Assurance & Testing engagement, this team is the answer.

FAQs

How much does it cost to hire Contivio?
The cost of hiring Contivio depends on factors such as project complexity, development hours, required technologies, team size, and engagement model. Based on available data, Contivio's typical hourly rate is around $50 - $99, with an average project cost of $5000000+.
Is Contivio suitable for startups?
Yes. Many startups choose companies like Contivio because they offer MVP development, product consulting, scalable architecture, and dedicated development teams that help launch products quickly while managing development costs. For context, its listed capabilities span Mobile App Development, Cross Platform App Development, IoT App Development, VR App Development and Unity 3D Game Development, and its average project cost is reported at $5000000+.
What technologies does Contivio specialize in?
Depending on the project requirements, Contivio may work with technologies such as React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, iOS, Android, AWS, Azure, AI, and cloud platforms. For context, its listed capabilities span Mobile App Development, Cross Platform App Development, IoT App Development, VR App Development and Unity 3D Game Development, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
How long does Contivio take to complete a software project?
Project timelines vary depending on scope and complexity. A simple MVP may take a few weeks, while enterprise software or large-scale digital transformation projects can require several months of development, testing, and deployment. With a team of 10 - 49 professionals, Contivio can scale resources based on project urgency.
How do I choose the right software development company?
When selecting a software development company like Contivio, consider its portfolio, client reviews, industry expertise, technical capabilities, communication process, pricing model, project management approach, and post-launch support. For context, its listed capabilities span Mobile App Development, Cross Platform App Development, IoT App Development, VR App Development and Unity 3D Game Development, and its typical hourly rate is around $50 - $99.
Does Contivio offer dedicated developers?
Yes, many companies like Contivio provide a dedicated developer hiring model, allowing businesses to scale their in-house team with experienced professionals who work exclusively on their project. For context, it has experience across industries such as Advertising & Marketing and Gaming & Gambling, and it has been operating since 2003.
What engagement models does Contivio provide?
Contivio may offer multiple engagement models such as fixed-price contracts, dedicated team hiring, and time-and-material billing, allowing businesses to choose the option that best fits their budget and project scope. For context, it has experience across industries such as Advertising & Marketing and Gaming & Gambling, and its listed capabilities span Mobile App Development, Cross Platform App Development, IoT App Development, VR App Development and Unity 3D Game Development.
Can Contivio modernize legacy software?
Contivio may provide legacy software modernization services, including re-platforming, code refactoring, and migration to modern frameworks or cloud infrastructure to improve performance and maintainability. For context, its listed capabilities span Mobile App Development, Cross Platform App Development, IoT App Development, VR App Development and Unity 3D Game Development, and its typical hourly rate is around $50 - $99.
How do I request a proposal from Contivio?
You can request a proposal from Contivio by submitting your project requirements through its website contact form, email, or by reaching out directly to discuss your business goals and receive a tailored development estimate. For context, it has experience across industries such as Advertising & Marketing and Gaming & Gambling, and it has been operating since 2003.

Company Info

Founded 2003
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate $50 - $99
Avg. Project Cost $5,000,000+
Client Rating 5.0/5 (2 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
5.0