CYBOSOL

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.4/5 (12 reviews)
+97144432051 sales@cybosol.com Visit Website

About CYBOSOL

Cybosol has the extraordinary advantage of being shaped up and led by a brilliant team of skilled professionals, highly qualified in latest technologies, best practices, product delivery, service support and the whole gamut of business functions. Since their beginning in 2006, they gained recognition as a product and services company known for its customer focus and delivery finesse.

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development UI-UX Design

Industries Served

Construction Manufacturing

CYBOSOL Reviews

Write a Review

CRM that finally unified our sales, marketing, and customer success teams in one system

Aarav Mehta / Chief Data Officer - Zenith FinServ Ltd
Verified
Jan 10, 2026

Project summary: Our engineering capacity was committed to maintaining existing systems and could not absorb a net-new build of this complexity. An external partner with the right skills was the only viable option.

Six months after go-live our platform is processing three times the transaction volume we specified in the original brief. The architecture choices made during discovery accommodated that growth without remediation work. That is the difference between a team that designs for what you tell them and a team that designs for what you are likely to need. We are in conversation about a Phase 2 engagement and I expect to be using this partnership for several years.

PROS

Production system that has performed as specified since go-live without remediation work, documentation thorough enough to support internal maintenance, knowledge transfer that left our team genuinely capable

CONS

Their discovery process is more rigorous than we were accustomed to and required more preparation from our side than we had initially allocated — but the quality of what followed justified every hour of it

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.5
Schedule
5.0
Cost
4.0
Communication
Project TypeCRM Development
IndustryConstruction
Project Cost$150,000 to $499,999
DurationJul 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Zenith FinServ Ltd is an established Construction organisation headquartered in Bangalore, India. My role as Chief Data Officer covers both strategic planning and operational technology delivery. We maintain high standards for our vendors because our clients hold us to high standards — a bar we expect our partners to meet.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Regulatory requirements in our Construction segment had changed and the compliance timeline was set by our regulator, not by us. The CRM Development changes required were significant enough to justify engaging a specialist partner rather than diverting our internal team from the product roadmap.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The scope covered the full CRM Development lifecycle: discovery and requirements definition, solution architecture, iterative development across twelve sprints, integration testing, performance validation, production deployment, and a structured four-week hypercare period. They also provided system documentation and a knowledge transfer programme for our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We ran a structured shortlisting process across five vendors. The technical evaluation eliminated two immediately. Of the remaining three, this team's proposal was differentiated by the specificity of their CRM Development approach and the evidence base they provided — reference projects in Construction contexts, not generic case studies. The reference calls confirmed a track record that the proposal had described accurately.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management framework was the most structured I have experienced with an external vendor. Sprint planning was tight, acceptance criteria were specific, retrospectives were honest and acted on. The project manager treated the shared backlog as a live document and the risk register as an operational tool rather than a compliance artefact. I never had to ask for a status update.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes to both. There was a single sprint where a dependency on a third-party API introduced a one-week delay. The team identified it three weeks in advance, presented two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the schedule within the same sprint cycle. That level of foresight is what separates good project management from reactive problem management.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The ROI case we presented to our board was conservative by design. Current performance against the financial model suggests we will hit the projected payback point in under twelve months against an eighteen-month target. The operational efficiency gains in particular have exceeded the model, in part because the quality of the data the new platform generates supports decisions that the previous system could not.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. I would add the context that this is not the cheapest option in the market and they are selective about the engagements they take on. If your primary criterion is price, there are alternatives. If you want a technology partner who can be trusted with a complex CRM Development programme in the Construction space and will deliver against a serious brief, this is the team.

Edge computing architecture that handles our sensor load without breaking a sweat

Priscilla Tan / Head of Engineering - AsiaPac FinTech Pte Ltd
Verified
Feb 13, 2023

Project summary: We needed to connect our factory floor systems to our ERP to give operations management real-time visibility into production status, waste, and throughput.

Project governance was one of the things that impressed me most. We had a dedicated project manager who ran tight fortnightly sprints with clear acceptance criteria, a shared backlog that gave us full visibility at all times, and a change request process that was fair and transparent. Nothing slipped through the cracks, no bill shock at the end, and the final delivery matched the original scope document almost perfectly. In my experience that kind of discipline is genuinely uncommon.

PROS

Business-aware approach to every technical decision, strong project governance, fast turnaround on feedback, zero drama during a genuinely complex engagement

CONS

Time zone difference required some adjustment to our internal communication habits but the team managed the overlap window efficiently and it never affected momentum

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeIoT Development
IndustryManufacturing
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationNov 2024 – Apr 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at AsiaPac FinTech Pte Ltd, a mid-sized organisation in the Manufacturing sector headquartered in Singapore. My remit as Head of Engineering covers everything from infrastructure to product development. We had reached a point where our internal engineering capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap without an experienced external partner.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our Manufacturing regulatory environment had changed and the compliance timeline was non-negotiable. We needed to rebuild specific components of our system to meet the new requirements and our internal team was already fully committed to the core product roadmap. Bringing in a specialist IoT Development partner was the only realistic path.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The full IoT Development lifecycle from discovery through to production deployment and hypercare support. This included requirements workshops, solution architecture, sprint-based development, QA and automated testing, deployment to our cloud environment, and a structured handover with documentation. They also provided a brief post-launch period of dedicated support which was genuinely useful.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
A direct referral from a peer who had used them for a comparable IoT Development engagement in the Manufacturing space. That peer's experience had been excellent and their project profile was similar enough to ours that the recommendation carried real weight. Everything we found during our own evaluation reinforced that this was the right decision.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thorough and precise. They translated our business language into technical requirements without losing the intent, which is a skill that sounds straightforward but frequently goes wrong. Every user story they wrote was reviewed against the original business objective before it entered the sprint and the acceptance criteria were specific enough to remove subjectivity from QA.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. I have worked with agencies that communicate beautifully during the sales process and go quiet during delivery. This was the opposite — structured, consistent, and genuinely informative throughout. Problems were surfaced early with proposed solutions rather than just problem statements, which made the inevitable mid-project decisions much easier to make.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I will note that the original timeline was aggressive and I had privately expected a slip. They managed to hold it by making smart sequencing decisions early on that I only fully understood in retrospect. The budget discipline was equally good — we received a single change request for scope we had introduced ourselves and it was priced fairly.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Hard to isolate precisely because several factors changed simultaneously, but the data we can attribute directly to the new IoT Development platform shows a meaningful improvement in the metrics that matter to our Manufacturing business. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations, which was one of the strategic objectives we started with.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The intellectual honesty. They told us when something we wanted was a bad idea and explained why. They told us when a timeline was tight and gave us options. They did not tell us what we wanted to hear in order to win work or avoid a difficult conversation. In a long engagement that kind of relationship is far more valuable than an agency that just says yes.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active conversation about the next phase of work and I expect this to become a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Manufacturing space looking for a IoT Development partner who combines technical rigour with genuine commercial awareness, I would put this team at the top of the shortlist.

FAQs

How much does it cost to hire CYBOSOL?
The cost of hiring CYBOSOL depends on factors such as project complexity, development hours, required technologies, team size, and engagement model. Based on available data, CYBOSOL's typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149, with an average project cost of $2500000+.
Which industries does CYBOSOL serve?
CYBOSOL has experience working with businesses across multiple industries, including Events & Event Management, Manufacturing, Food & Beverage, Insurance, Telecommunications and Environmental Services.
Is CYBOSOL suitable for startups?
Yes. Many startups choose companies like CYBOSOL because they offer MVP development, product consulting, scalable architecture, and dedicated development teams that help launch products quickly while managing development costs. For context, it has served clients in United-arab-emirates, and its average project cost is reported at $2500000+.
Does CYBOSOL provide post-launch support and maintenance?
Many software development companies, including CYBOSOL, offer ongoing maintenance, bug fixes, performance optimization, security updates, feature enhancements, and technical support after project deployment. For context, it has experience across industries such as Events & Event Management, Manufacturing, Food & Beverage, Insurance, Telecommunications and Environmental Services, and it has served clients in United-arab-emirates.
How can I contact CYBOSOL for a project?
Businesses can contact CYBOSOL through its official website, email, or contact form to discuss project requirements, request a consultation, or receive a development estimate. For context, it has served clients in United-arab-emirates, and it has experience across industries such as Events & Event Management, Manufacturing, Food & Beverage, Insurance, Telecommunications and Environmental Services.
Does CYBOSOL offer dedicated developers?
Yes, many companies like CYBOSOL provide a dedicated developer hiring model, allowing businesses to scale their in-house team with experienced professionals who work exclusively on their project. For context, it has served clients in United-arab-emirates, and it has experience across industries such as Events & Event Management, Manufacturing, Food & Beverage, Insurance, Telecommunications and Environmental Services.
What engagement models does CYBOSOL provide?
CYBOSOL may offer multiple engagement models such as fixed-price contracts, dedicated team hiring, and time-and-material billing, allowing businesses to choose the option that best fits their budget and project scope. For context, it has experience across industries such as Events & Event Management, Manufacturing, Food & Beverage, Insurance, Telecommunications and Environmental Services, and its typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149.
Which countries does CYBOSOL serve?
CYBOSOL may serve clients across multiple countries and regions, including United-arab-emirates, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
Can CYBOSOL modernize legacy software?
CYBOSOL may provide legacy software modernization services, including re-platforming, code refactoring, and migration to modern frameworks or cloud infrastructure to improve performance and maintainability. For context, it has served clients in United-arab-emirates, and its listed capabilities span Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design and Web Development.
How do I request a proposal from CYBOSOL?
You can request a proposal from CYBOSOL by submitting your project requirements through its website contact form, email, or by reaching out directly to discuss your business goals and receive a tailored development estimate. For context, it has experience across industries such as Events & Event Management, Manufacturing, Food & Beverage, Insurance, Telecommunications and Environmental Services, and it reports a team size of 50 - 249 professionals.

Company Info

Founded 2009
Employees 50 - 249
Hourly Rate $100 - $149
Avg. Project Cost $50,000+
Client Rating 4.4/5 (12 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.2
Schedule
4.4
Cost
4.6
Communication
4.5