EnTechEco

Write a Review Claim this Company
5.0/5 (2 reviews)
+380577841601 NA Visit Website

About EnTechEco

EnTechEco has been in continuous operation since 1991, giving the company more than three decades of accumulated experience delivered through a team of 10 to 49 professionals. Its seven-service portfolio is one of the broadest in its class, spanning mobile app development and cross platform app development, web development, UI-UX design, custom software development, and AR app development. This range allows EnTechEco to support clients across the full lifecycle of a digital product, from initial interface design through to build, deployment, and augmented reality extensions. The company bills at 100 to 149 dollars per hour and reports an average project cost of about 100,000 dollars, figures that reflect a mid-market position suited to substantial but not necessarily enterprise-scale engagements. With more than 30 years of operating history behind it, EnTechEco has had time to develop the kind of cross-disciplinary capability that lets a single vendor cover design, development, and emerging-technology needs without requiring clients to coordinate multiple external partners.

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development AR App Development UI-UX Design Custom Software Development Cross Platform App Development

Industries Served

Real Estate Environmental Services

EnTechEco Reviews

Write a Review

Predictive analytics that gave us an edge we had never had before

Divya Nair / Director of Technology - BrightPath EdTech
Verified
Feb 23, 2026

Project summary: Buyer expectations had shifted dramatically toward digital-first experiences and our static listing site was no longer competitive with the portals our clients were comparing us against.

The technical quality of the work is the easiest thing to praise, but what I want to highlight is the communication culture on this team. Every question got a same-day response. Every risk got flagged before it became an issue. When we needed to change direction mid-project — a business decision on our side — they absorbed the change professionally, requoted fairly, and kept momentum going. That flexibility is something you cannot assess in a proposal and it turned out to be one of the most valuable things about working with them.

PROS

Architectural decisions that will serve us for years rather than just solving the immediate problem, knowledge transfer that left our team genuinely capable, no scope creep at all

CONS

Honestly nothing worth documenting — we went in with high expectations and they were met on every measure

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeAI & Machine Learning
IndustryReal Estate
Project Cost$150,000 to $499,999
DurationApr 2025 – Apr 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As Director of Technology at BrightPath EdTech, I manage a cross-functional technology team serving our Real Estate clients from Pune, India. We are a commercially focused organisation and every technology decision we make is evaluated against a clear business case. We needed a partner who understood that context, not just the technical brief.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our Real Estate regulatory environment had changed and the compliance timeline was non-negotiable. We needed to rebuild specific components of our system to meet the new requirements and our internal team was already fully committed to the core product roadmap. Bringing in a specialist AI & Machine Learning partner was the only realistic path.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end AI & Machine Learning delivery with a particular emphasis on the integration layer that connected the new build to our existing Real Estate infrastructure. They also provided UI/UX input that was not in the original scope but which they offered proactively because they could see it would affect adoption. That kind of initiative was characteristic of how they approached the whole engagement.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
Honestly, the quality of the questions they asked during the briefing process set them apart. Most vendors listen to the brief and come back with a solution to exactly what you described. This team came back with a solution to what we actually needed, which turned out to be somewhat different. That kind of consultative instinct is what we were looking for.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thorough and precise. They translated our business language into technical requirements without losing the intent, which is a skill that sounds straightforward but frequently goes wrong. Every user story they wrote was reviewed against the original business objective before it entered the sprint and the acceptance criteria were specific enough to remove subjectivity from QA.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. We used a shared project management tool that gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every meeting. The project manager had a clear escalation path and used it appropriately. The only time I needed to intervene directly was when I chose to, not because something had been missed.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on the agreed delivery date and within the approved budget. We did add scope during the engagement — two features that became apparent as essential during user testing — and those were quoted, approved, and delivered without affecting the original scope timeline. That kind of clean change management is not something you can take for granted.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Hard to isolate precisely because several factors changed simultaneously, but the data we can attribute directly to the new AI & Machine Learning platform shows a meaningful improvement in the metrics that matter to our Real Estate business. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations, which was one of the strategic objectives we started with.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The intellectual honesty. They told us when something we wanted was a bad idea and explained why. They told us when a timeline was tight and gave us options. They did not tell us what we wanted to hear in order to win work or avoid a difficult conversation. In a long engagement that kind of relationship is far more valuable than an agency that just says yes.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
I recommend them to anyone who asks and occasionally to people who do not. The combination of AI & Machine Learning expertise, Real Estate domain knowledge, and delivery discipline is genuinely difficult to find. We found it here and we intend to keep it.

A technology partner worth every penny of the investment

Connor MacLeod / CTO - Pacific Ventures Group
Verified
Nov 14, 2025

Project summary: We had a clear product vision but lacked the engineering capacity internally to execute it within the window our market opportunity required.

I have worked with development agencies on four continents over the past fifteen years and this team sits comfortably in the top tier. What separated them was not just technical skill, which was genuinely impressive, but their instinct for asking the right business questions before reaching for a technical answer. The project ran to schedule, the architecture is clean and well-documented, and the handover was thorough. Six months after go-live we have not raised a single critical support ticket. That speaks for itself.

PROS

Technical depth across the full stack, honest and timely communication, delivered exactly what was scoped without surprise additions to the invoice

CONS

Their calendar books up quickly which made scheduling the initial kickoff slightly challenging — a good problem for them to have and not one that affected our delivery

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeEmbedded Systems Development
IndustryEnvironmental Services
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationApr 2025 – Sep 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As CTO at Pacific Ventures Group, I manage a cross-functional technology team serving our Environmental Services clients from Vancouver, Canada. We are a commercially focused organisation and every technology decision we make is evaluated against a clear business case. We needed a partner who understood that context, not just the technical brief.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our existing Embedded Systems Development capability had accumulated years of technical debt that was slowing every new feature to a crawl. Incident frequency was rising, developer confidence was falling, and we knew a rebuild was overdue. We needed a partner with the depth to do it properly rather than apply another layer of patches.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily Embedded Systems Development, though the scope naturally touched adjacent areas. They handled architecture design, implementation, integration with our existing systems, performance testing under realistic load, and knowledge transfer to our internal team. The breadth of what they covered without requiring us to bring in additional vendors was one of the reasons the project ran efficiently.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
A direct referral from a peer who had used them for a comparable Embedded Systems Development engagement in the Environmental Services space. That peer's experience had been excellent and their project profile was similar enough to ours that the recommendation carried real weight. Everything we found during our own evaluation reinforced that this was the right decision.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
The requirements understanding was solid from early on, aided by the fact that they had prior experience in the Environmental Services sector and did not need us to explain domain context that a less experienced team would have required. That background knowledge shortened the discovery phase meaningfully and reduced the volume of clarification questions during sprints.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. I have worked with agencies that communicate beautifully during the sales process and go quiet during delivery. This was the opposite — structured, consistent, and genuinely informative throughout. Problems were surfaced early with proposed solutions rather than just problem statements, which made the inevitable mid-project decisions much easier to make.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes on both counts. There was one sprint where a third-party integration took longer than scoped because of undocumented API behaviour on the vendor side. The team flagged it immediately, proposed two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the timeline within two weeks. That is how scope issues should be handled and rarely are.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is that the problem we hired them to solve no longer exists. Beyond that, the new Embedded Systems Development platform has reduced our operational overhead measurably, our team spends less time managing incidents and more time on product development, and we have been able to onboard two new enterprise clients who had previously cited our technical limitations as a barrier.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The quality of the written communication. This matters more than most clients articulate. Clear, concise, technically accurate updates that our non-technical stakeholders could read and understand. Proposals and change requests that made the decision obvious rather than obscuring it in jargon. That communication quality reduced our internal coordination overhead significantly.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without qualification. I have already made two direct referrals to peers in the Environmental Services sector who were facing similar Embedded Systems Development challenges. In both cases I gave the recommendation specifically because I was confident the experience would match what I described — which is a level of confidence I do not extend lightly.

FAQs

What services does EnTechEco offer?
EnTechEco provides software development services that may include mobile app development, web development, custom software development, UI/UX design, cloud solutions, AI development, and enterprise application development. Its core focus areas include Mobile App Development, Cross Platform App Development, Web Development, UI-UX Design and Custom Software Development.
How much does it cost to hire EnTechEco?
The cost of hiring EnTechEco depends on factors such as project complexity, development hours, required technologies, team size, and engagement model. Based on available data, EnTechEco's typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149, with an average project cost of $25000+.
Which industries does EnTechEco serve?
EnTechEco has experience working with businesses across multiple industries, including Real Estate and Environmental Services.
Is EnTechEco suitable for startups?
Yes. Many startups choose companies like EnTechEco because they offer MVP development, product consulting, scalable architecture, and dedicated development teams that help launch products quickly while managing development costs. For context, its listed capabilities span Mobile App Development, Cross Platform App Development, Web Development, UI-UX Design and Custom Software Development, and its average project cost is reported at $25000+.
What technologies does EnTechEco specialize in?
Depending on the project requirements, EnTechEco may work with technologies such as React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, iOS, Android, AWS, Azure, AI, and cloud platforms. For context, its listed capabilities span Mobile App Development, Cross Platform App Development, Web Development, UI-UX Design and Custom Software Development, and its typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149.
How do I choose the right software development company?
When selecting a software development company like EnTechEco, consider its portfolio, client reviews, industry expertise, technical capabilities, communication process, pricing model, project management approach, and post-launch support. For context, its listed capabilities span Mobile App Development, Cross Platform App Development, Web Development, UI-UX Design and Custom Software Development, and its typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149.
Is EnTechEco an offshore software development company?
EnTechEco may operate as an offshore, onshore, or hybrid software development company depending on its location and the markets it serves. For context, its listed capabilities span Mobile App Development, Cross Platform App Development, Web Development, UI-UX Design and Custom Software Development, and its average project cost is reported at $25000+.
What engagement models does EnTechEco provide?
EnTechEco may offer multiple engagement models such as fixed-price contracts, dedicated team hiring, and time-and-material billing, allowing businesses to choose the option that best fits their budget and project scope. For context, its listed capabilities span Mobile App Development, Cross Platform App Development, Web Development, UI-UX Design and Custom Software Development, and its typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149.
Does EnTechEco develop SaaS products?
Yes, EnTechEco may offer SaaS product development services, including multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing integration, and cloud-native deployment for scalable software-as-a-service solutions. For context, its listed capabilities span Mobile App Development, Cross Platform App Development, Web Development, UI-UX Design and Custom Software Development, and its typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149.
What is EnTechEco's software development process?
EnTechEco typically follows a structured software development process that may include requirement analysis, UI/UX design, agile development sprints, quality assurance testing, deployment, and post-launch support. For context, its listed capabilities span Mobile App Development, Cross Platform App Development, Web Development, UI-UX Design and Custom Software Development, and it has experience across industries such as Real Estate and Environmental Services.

Company Info

Founded 1991
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate $100 - $149
Avg. Project Cost $25,000+
Client Rating 5.0/5 (2 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
5.0