eTeam Inc.

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.3/5 (12 reviews)
+12138398500 hello@eteam.io Visit Website

About eTeam Inc.

We've been building customer software for our clients, partners and our own products since 2009. Our team includes experts in JavaScript, Python and Ruby plus engineers with AWS certification. From UX design, project management to development and delivery, we’ve got the complete life-cycle of your custom software, native app or webapp covered.

Our approach and dedication to agile, iterative development with complete transparency allows us to bring decades of combined experience to new startups and the fresh innovation of a small team to enterprise projects. Whether you're looking for a dedicated team to work within your company or for a partner to provide a complete solution, eTeam is ready to work with you.

American Entrepreneurship + Ukrainian Engineering = Great Software

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development UI-UX Design Web Design E-commerce Development Data Science & Big Data DevOps & Cloud

Industries Served

Human Resources Real Estate

eTeam Inc. Reviews

Write a Review

Sensor network and analytics layer built by engineers who understood both halves equally

Abdullah Al-Shehri / Head of Innovation - Desert Tech Ventures
Verified
Feb 08, 2026

Project summary: A previous engagement had delivered something that worked in staging and struggled in production. We approached this project with greater rigour in vendor selection as a result.

Six months after go-live our platform is processing three times the transaction volume we specified in the original brief. The architecture choices made during discovery accommodated that growth without remediation work. That is the difference between a team that designs for what you tell them and a team that designs for what you are likely to need. We are in conversation about a Phase 2 engagement and I expect to be using this partnership for several years.

PROS

Delivery timeline that proved achievable rather than optimistic, estimation accuracy that reflected real analysis rather than competitive bidding, scope discipline that prevented the feature creep we had experienced before

CONS

Their discovery process is more rigorous than we were accustomed to and required more preparation from our side than we had initially allocated — but the quality of what followed justified every hour of it

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.5
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeIoT Development
IndustryHuman Resources
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationSep 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Desert Tech Ventures is an established Human Resources organisation headquartered in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. My role as Head of Innovation covers both strategic planning and operational technology delivery. We maintain high standards for our vendors because our clients hold us to high standards — a bar we expect our partners to meet.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Regulatory requirements in our Human Resources segment had changed and the compliance timeline was set by our regulator, not by us. The IoT Development changes required were significant enough to justify engaging a specialist partner rather than diverting our internal team from the product roadmap.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily IoT Development, with adjacent work in solution architecture and quality assurance. They were responsible for the full build from requirements through to go-live, including integration with four existing systems in our technology landscape. The breadth they covered without requiring additional vendors was commercially and logistically valuable.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Extremely well, in part because they had relevant Human Resources experience that reduced the context-setting overhead significantly. They understood the domain vocabulary, asked the right questions, and translated business requirements into technical specifications with a fidelity that meant the development phase had very few clarification cycles.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I had privately built a contingency expectation into my planning given the project complexity and the number of integrations involved. None of that contingency was needed. The delivery landed on the agreed date and the final invoice matched the approved budget to within a fraction of a percent. That outcome is rarer than the industry acknowledges.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. I would add the context that this is not the cheapest option in the market and they are selective about the engagements they take on. If your primary criterion is price, there are alternatives. If you want a technology partner who can be trusted with a complex IoT Development programme in the Human Resources space and will deliver against a serious brief, this is the team.

Real-time dashboards that our executives now open before any other application

Priya Chandrasekaran / VP of Data & AI - Wavefront Analytics Inc
Verified
Jan 26, 2026

Project summary: Our agents were spending more time managing data across disconnected systems than managing relationships. We needed a unified platform to give them that time back.

Our stakeholder group included board members, clinical leads, compliance officers, and end users — each with different technical literacy and different success criteria. This team navigated that stakeholder landscape as well as any vendor I have seen. They adjusted their communication register depending on the audience without losing the substance. They managed expectations honestly throughout. And they delivered a system that each group can point to as meeting their requirements. That breadth is genuinely uncommon.

PROS

Production system that has performed as specified since go-live without remediation work, documentation thorough enough to support internal maintenance, knowledge transfer that left our team genuinely capable

CONS

The quality of documentation they produce means our team needed to set aside dedicated review time to do it justice — a minor scheduling point rather than a genuine criticism

4.0
Overall
4.0
Quality
4.0
Schedule
3.5
Cost
3.5
Communication
Project TypeData & Analytics
IndustryReal Estate
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationFeb 2025 – Oct 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Wavefront Analytics Inc operates in the Real Estate sector with headquarters in Seattle, USA. In my role as VP of Data & AI I am accountable for the full technology agenda — infrastructure, product, and vendor relationships. We are a commercially driven organisation and every technology decision is evaluated against a clear business case before it is approved.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Regulatory requirements in our Real Estate segment had changed and the compliance timeline was set by our regulator, not by us. The Data & Analytics changes required were significant enough to justify engaging a specialist partner rather than diverting our internal team from the product roadmap.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily Data & Analytics, with adjacent work in solution architecture and quality assurance. They were responsible for the full build from requirements through to go-live, including integration with four existing systems in our technology landscape. The breadth they covered without requiring additional vendors was commercially and logistically valuable.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes to both. There was a single sprint where a dependency on a third-party API introduced a one-week delay. The team identified it three weeks in advance, presented two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the schedule within the same sprint cycle. That level of foresight is what separates good project management from reactive problem management.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live four months ago. User adoption exceeded the target we had set by 23 percent in the first month. Support ticket volume has dropped measurably. The features we had deferred because the previous architecture made them prohibitively expensive to build are now in development. The platform they built has opened our roadmap.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who participated in the discovery sessions were the engineers who built the system. That consistency of institutional knowledge across a six-month project has a value that is difficult to quantify but easy to notice when it is absent. Every conversation built on the previous ones.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active scoping conversations for a second engagement and I expect this to develop into a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Real Estate sector looking for Data & Analytics expertise combined with genuine delivery discipline, I would put this team at the top of the evaluation list.

FAQs

Which industries does eTeam Inc. serve?
eTeam Inc. has experience working with businesses across multiple industries, including Insurance, Aerospace & Defense, Telecommunications, Construction, Advertising & Marketing and Automotive.
Is eTeam Inc. suitable for startups?
Yes. Many startups choose companies like eTeam Inc. because they offer MVP development, product consulting, scalable architecture, and dedicated development teams that help launch products quickly while managing development costs. For context, it has served clients in Ukraine, and its listed capabilities span Data Science & Big Data, DevOps & Cloud, E-commerce Development, Mobile App Development and UI-UX Design.
How long does eTeam Inc. take to complete a software project?
Project timelines vary depending on scope and complexity. A simple MVP may take a few weeks, while enterprise software or large-scale digital transformation projects can require several months of development, testing, and deployment. With a team of 10 - 49 professionals, eTeam Inc. can scale resources based on project urgency.
Does eTeam Inc. provide post-launch support and maintenance?
Many software development companies, including eTeam Inc., offer ongoing maintenance, bug fixes, performance optimization, security updates, feature enhancements, and technical support after project deployment. For context, it has experience across industries such as Insurance, Aerospace & Defense, Telecommunications, Construction, Advertising & Marketing and Automotive, and its average project cost is reported at $50000+.
Is eTeam Inc. an offshore software development company?
eTeam Inc. may operate as an offshore, onshore, or hybrid software development company depending on its location and the markets it serves. For context, it has served clients in Ukraine, and its listed capabilities span Data Science & Big Data, DevOps & Cloud, E-commerce Development, Mobile App Development and UI-UX Design.
Can eTeam Inc. build AI-powered applications?
Many modern software development companies, including eTeam Inc., offer AI and machine learning integration services such as chatbots, predictive analytics, computer vision, and intelligent automation. For context, it has experience across industries such as Insurance, Aerospace & Defense, Telecommunications, Construction, Advertising & Marketing and Automotive, and its typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49.
Does eTeam Inc. sign an NDA before starting a project?
Most professional software development companies, including eTeam Inc., are willing to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) to protect client data and project confidentiality before development begins. For context, its listed capabilities span Data Science & Big Data, DevOps & Cloud, E-commerce Development, Mobile App Development and UI-UX Design, and it has served clients in Ukraine.
Which countries does eTeam Inc. serve?
eTeam Inc. may serve clients across multiple countries and regions, including Ukraine, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
How do I request a proposal from eTeam Inc.?
You can request a proposal from eTeam Inc. by submitting your project requirements through its website contact form, email, or by reaching out directly to discuss your business goals and receive a tailored development estimate. For context, it has served clients in Ukraine, and its listed capabilities span Data Science & Big Data, DevOps & Cloud, E-commerce Development, Mobile App Development and UI-UX Design.

Company Info

Founded 2010
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate $25 - $49
Avg. Project Cost $30,000+
Client Rating 4.3/5 (12 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.3
Schedule
4.3
Cost
4.2
Communication
4.2