Evince Development (EvinceDev Inc.)

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.3/5 (12 reviews)
+12031520715208494 info@evdpl.com Visit Website

About Evince Development (EvinceDev Inc.)

Evince Development (EvinceDev Inc.) is a software development company that turns ideas into working products. The company's main offerings are Mobile App Development. Its team includes 50 - 249 specialists working across design, development, and delivery. Typical hourly rates run around $25 - $49 / hr/hr, with an average project cost near $60,000. Clients have rated Evince Development (EvinceDev Inc.) 4.8 out of 5 in 37 reviews. Their home base is New York, NY. Overall, Evince Development (EvinceDev Inc.) is one of the options worth shortlisting for a technology project.

Where We Specialize

33% Market Research
Market Research 33%
Virtual Reality 27%
Web Development 19%
IoT App Development 10%
Mobile App Development 6%
VR App Development 5%

Industry Expertise

Hospitality67% Travel33%

Typical Project Size

46% Enterprise
34% Small Business
20% Midmarket Business

Evince Development (EvinceDev Inc.) Reviews

Write a Review

Project delivered with the kind of professionalism that earns a long-term relationship

Tyler Nguyen / Founder & CTO - BlueRidge Software
Verified
Jan 09, 2025

Project summary: Attribution had become nearly impossible with our fragmented martech stack and we needed a clean data layer that could connect spend to outcomes across every channel.

The technical quality of the work is the easiest thing to praise, but what I want to highlight is the communication culture on this team. Every question got a same-day response. Every risk got flagged before it became an issue. When we needed to change direction mid-project — a business decision on our side — they absorbed the change professionally, requoted fairly, and kept momentum going. That flexibility is something you cannot assess in a proposal and it turned out to be one of the most valuable things about working with them.

PROS

Collaborative working style that made them feel like an extension of our team, excellent written communication for our async timezone relationship, clean and readable codebase

CONS

Time zone difference required some adjustment to our internal communication habits but the team managed the overlap window efficiently and it never affected momentum

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeIndustry-Specific Solutions
IndustryAdvertising & Marketing
Project Cost$50,000 to $149,999
DurationJan 2025 – Mar 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at BlueRidge Software, a mid-sized organisation in the Advertising & Marketing sector headquartered in Austin, USA. My remit as Founder & CTO covers everything from infrastructure to product development. We had reached a point where our internal engineering capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap without an experienced external partner.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Growth into new markets had exposed serious limitations in our platform. What had worked for our original user base in Austin, USA was not going to scale internationally, and the Industry-Specific Solutions requirements for those new markets were meaningfully different. We needed a partner who had solved that kind of problem before.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end Industry-Specific Solutions delivery with a particular emphasis on the integration layer that connected the new build to our existing Advertising & Marketing infrastructure. They also provided UI/UX input that was not in the original scope but which they offered proactively because they could see it would affect adoption. That kind of initiative was characteristic of how they approached the whole engagement.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
Their portfolio included two projects that were sufficiently close to our own brief in terms of complexity, Industry-Specific Solutions scope, and Advertising & Marketing context that we felt confident they understood what we were asking. The proposal was technically rigorous, the pricing was transparent, and the proposed team structure gave us senior engineers throughout rather than just for the pitch.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Better than we did at the start, which sounds like an exaggeration but is genuinely accurate. The discovery workshop they ran surfaced assumptions we had not examined and contradictions in our requirements that would have caused real problems mid-development. The functional specification they produced was the clearest articulation of our product that we had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. We used a shared project management tool that gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every meeting. The project manager had a clear escalation path and used it appropriately. The only time I needed to intervene directly was when I chose to, not because something had been missed.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes on both counts. There was one sprint where a third-party integration took longer than scoped because of undocumented API behaviour on the vendor side. The team flagged it immediately, proposed two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the timeline within two weeks. That is how scope issues should be handled and rarely are.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Hard to isolate precisely because several factors changed simultaneously, but the data we can attribute directly to the new Industry-Specific Solutions platform shows a meaningful improvement in the metrics that matter to our Advertising & Marketing business. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations, which was one of the strategic objectives we started with.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The quality of the written communication. This matters more than most clients articulate. Clear, concise, technically accurate updates that our non-technical stakeholders could read and understand. Proposals and change requests that made the decision obvious rather than obscuring it in jargon. That communication quality reduced our internal coordination overhead significantly.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active conversation about the next phase of work and I expect this to become a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Advertising & Marketing space looking for a Industry-Specific Solutions partner who combines technical rigour with genuine commercial awareness, I would put this team at the top of the shortlist.

Visual identity and UX that our NPS scores immediately reflected

Karolina Dabrowska / CTO - Krakow Tech Studio
Verified
Jun 17, 2024

Project summary: Regulatory changes required us to rebuild our client reporting module from the ground up with full audit trail, real-time data, and a compliant data residency model.

Twelve weeks from kickoff to live production deployment for a project of this complexity. I would not have believed that was achievable if I had not watched them do it. The velocity came from genuine engineering discipline — clear requirements, short feedback loops, automated testing, and a team that communicated internally without the overhead that slows most agencies down. The product has been live for four months with no critical bugs and one minor patch. We are already in scoping conversations for phase two.

PROS

Architectural decisions that will serve us for years rather than just solving the immediate problem, knowledge transfer that left our team genuinely capable, no scope creep at all

CONS

Honestly nothing worth documenting — we went in with high expectations and they were met on every measure

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeUI/UX Design
IndustryFinancial Services
Project Cost$150,000 to $499,999
DurationSep 2025 – May 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Krakow Tech Studio is a Financial Services business based in Krakow, Poland. As CTO I am responsible for all technology investment decisions, vendor selection, and ensuring our digital capabilities match our growth ambitions. We operate in a competitive market where the quality of our software directly affects our ability to win and retain clients.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
We had a product concept validated by market research but no clear path to build it within our budget and timeline constraints. Our Financial Services competitors were moving quickly and we could not afford to spend eighteen months finding out a generalist agency could not execute the UI/UX Design work our product required.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The full UI/UX Design lifecycle from discovery through to production deployment and hypercare support. This included requirements workshops, solution architecture, sprint-based development, QA and automated testing, deployment to our cloud environment, and a structured handover with documentation. They also provided a brief post-launch period of dedicated support which was genuinely useful.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
A direct referral from a peer who had used them for a comparable UI/UX Design engagement in the Financial Services space. That peer's experience had been excellent and their project profile was similar enough to ours that the recommendation carried real weight. Everything we found during our own evaluation reinforced that this was the right decision.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Extremely well. They asked detailed questions, challenged vague requirements until they were specific, and proposed sensible defaults for decisions we had not yet made rather than just leaving them open. By the time development started there was no ambiguity in the backlog, which is a rare starting position.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was handled primarily asynchronously given the time zone difference between Krakow, Poland and the team's base, but it was managed so well that the gap rarely felt like a constraint. Written updates were clear and timely, escalations were handled promptly, and we never had to chase for a status update. The cadence was exactly right — enough to feel informed, not so much that it created overhead.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on the agreed delivery date and within the approved budget. We did add scope during the engagement — two features that became apparent as essential during user testing — and those were quoted, approved, and delivered without affecting the original scope timeline. That kind of clean change management is not something you can take for granted.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantitatively: user engagement metrics are up significantly since launch, our support ticket volume has dropped, and we have received unsolicited positive feedback from clients who noticed the improvement. Qualitatively: our internal team is proud of the product we now have, which affects morale and retention in ways that do not show up on a dashboard but matter enormously.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who scoped the work were the engineers who built it. That sounds like it should be standard practice but in my experience it often is not. The institutional knowledge that comes from that continuity pays dividends at every stage, particularly when you are dealing with a complex Financial Services domain where context takes time to build.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active conversation about the next phase of work and I expect this to become a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Financial Services space looking for a UI/UX Design partner who combines technical rigour with genuine commercial awareness, I would put this team at the top of the shortlist.

FAQs

How much does it cost to hire Evince Development?
The cost of hiring Evince Development depends on factors such as project complexity, development hours, required technologies, team size, and engagement model. Based on available data, Evince Development's typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49, with an average project cost of $100000+.
Which industries does Evince Development serve?
Evince Development has experience working with businesses across multiple industries, including Advertising & Marketing, Financial Services, Energy & Utilities, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Manufacturing and Human Resources.
Is Evince Development suitable for startups?
Yes. Many startups choose companies like Evince Development because they offer MVP development, product consulting, scalable architecture, and dedicated development teams that help launch products quickly while managing development costs. For context, its listed capabilities span Custom Software Development, E-commerce Development, Mobile App Development, SEO and UI-UX Design, and it has experience across industries such as Advertising & Marketing, Financial Services, Energy & Utilities, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Manufacturing and Human Resources.
What technologies does Evince Development specialize in?
Depending on the project requirements, Evince Development may work with technologies such as React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, iOS, Android, AWS, Azure, AI, and cloud platforms. For context, it has served clients in Norway, and it has been operating since 2012.
How long does Evince Development take to complete a software project?
Project timelines vary depending on scope and complexity. A simple MVP may take a few weeks, while enterprise software or large-scale digital transformation projects can require several months of development, testing, and deployment. With a team of 50 - 249 professionals, Evince Development can scale resources based on project urgency.
Why should businesses choose Evince Development?
Businesses may choose Evince Development based on factors such as technical expertise, industry experience, client reviews, development methodology, communication practices, and the ability to deliver scalable software solutions that align with business objectives. Founded in 2012, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
Does Evince Development provide post-launch support and maintenance?
Many software development companies, including Evince Development, offer ongoing maintenance, bug fixes, performance optimization, security updates, feature enhancements, and technical support after project deployment. For context, it has experience across industries such as Advertising & Marketing, Financial Services, Energy & Utilities, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Manufacturing and Human Resources, and it has been operating since 2012.
Does Evince Development sign an NDA before starting a project?
Most professional software development companies, including Evince Development, are willing to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) to protect client data and project confidentiality before development begins. For context, it has experience across industries such as Advertising & Marketing, Financial Services, Energy & Utilities, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Manufacturing and Human Resources, and its typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49.
Which countries does Evince Development serve?
Evince Development may serve clients across multiple countries and regions, including Norway, depending on market demand and business partnerships.

Company Info

Founded 2012
Employees 50 - 249
Hourly Rate $25 - $49 / hr
Avg. Project Cost $45,000+
Client Rating 4.3/5 (12 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.3
Schedule
4.4
Cost
4.3
Communication
4.3