Fenrir

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.5/5 (11 reviews)
N/A N/A Visit Website

About Fenrir

Fenrir Inc. is a leading mobile app development company specializing in smartphone applications. Moreover, they have taken on development projects assigned by over 300 different leading companies spanning a vast range of industries. They employ a large number of UX/UI designers who try to deliver designs that are not only visually appealing but also focus on usability, real-life experiences, use cases, and different kinds of technologies.

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development UI-UX Design Custom Software Development Web Design

Industries Served

Travel & Hospitality

Fenrir Reviews

Write a Review

Cloud modernisation that shaved weeks off our release cycle

Connor MacLeod / CTO - Pacific Ventures Group
Verified
Sep 14, 2022

Project summary: Guest experience scores had plateaued and our data showed that friction in the pre-arrival and in-stay digital journey was the primary cause — we needed a purpose-built guest app.

Twelve weeks from kickoff to live production deployment for a project of this complexity. I would not have believed that was achievable if I had not watched them do it. The velocity came from genuine engineering discipline — clear requirements, short feedback loops, automated testing, and a team that communicated internally without the overhead that slows most agencies down. The product has been live for four months with no critical bugs and one minor patch. We are already in scoping conversations for phase two.

PROS

Architectural decisions that will serve us for years rather than just solving the immediate problem, knowledge transfer that left our team genuinely capable, no scope creep at all

CONS

Their calendar books up quickly which made scheduling the initial kickoff slightly challenging — a good problem for them to have and not one that affected our delivery

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeCloud Services
IndustryTravel & Hospitality
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationSep 2025 – Feb 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Pacific Ventures Group, a mid-sized organisation in the Travel & Hospitality sector headquartered in Vancouver, Canada. My remit as CTO covers everything from infrastructure to product development. We had reached a point where our internal engineering capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap without an experienced external partner.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate trigger was a performance failure during our peak trading period that cost us measurably in both revenue and client trust. The root cause was architectural and our internal team did not have the Cloud Services expertise to address it properly. We needed specialists.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end Cloud Services delivery with a particular emphasis on the integration layer that connected the new build to our existing Travel & Hospitality infrastructure. They also provided UI/UX input that was not in the original scope but which they offered proactively because they could see it would affect adoption. That kind of initiative was characteristic of how they approached the whole engagement.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
Price was a factor but not the deciding one. They were mid-range in our evaluation. What tipped it was the combination of their technical depth in Cloud Services, the seniority of the team they proposed to assign to our account, and the clarity of their project governance model. We had been burned by an agency that overpromised before and we needed to see evidence of process maturity.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thorough and precise. They translated our business language into technical requirements without losing the intent, which is a skill that sounds straightforward but frequently goes wrong. Every user story they wrote was reviewed against the original business objective before it entered the sprint and the acceptance criteria were specific enough to remove subjectivity from QA.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management was the best I have experienced in a vendor relationship. We had fortnightly sprint reviews with structured agendas, a shared backlog that we could inspect at any point, a risk register that was actively maintained rather than created at kickoff and never opened again, and a project manager who treated our time as something worth protecting. Communication was proactive, not reactive.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes on both counts. There was one sprint where a third-party integration took longer than scoped because of undocumented API behaviour on the vendor side. The team flagged it immediately, proposed two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the timeline within two weeks. That is how scope issues should be handled and rarely are.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live three months ago. In that time we have not had a single P1 incident, our page performance scores have improved across every measure, and the feature we had deprioritised for years because the old architecture made it too complex to implement is now in our next sprint. The platform they built has opened up our roadmap in a way we had not anticipated.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The quality of the written communication. This matters more than most clients articulate. Clear, concise, technically accurate updates that our non-technical stakeholders could read and understand. Proposals and change requests that made the decision obvious rather than obscuring it in jargon. That communication quality reduced our internal coordination overhead significantly.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active conversation about the next phase of work and I expect this to become a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Travel & Hospitality space looking for a Cloud Services partner who combines technical rigour with genuine commercial awareness, I would put this team at the top of the shortlist.

FAQs

How much does it cost to hire Fenrir?
The cost of hiring Fenrir depends on factors such as project complexity, development hours, required technologies, team size, and engagement model. Based on available data, Fenrir's typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149, with an average project cost of $50000+.
Is Fenrir suitable for startups?
Yes. Many startups choose companies like Fenrir because they offer MVP development, product consulting, scalable architecture, and dedicated development teams that help launch products quickly while managing development costs. For context, it has served clients in Japan, and it has been operating since 2005.
What technologies does Fenrir specialize in?
Depending on the project requirements, Fenrir may work with technologies such as React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, iOS, Android, AWS, Azure, AI, and cloud platforms. For context, its listed capabilities span Custom Software Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design, Web Design and Web Development, and it has served clients in Japan.
Does Fenrir provide post-launch support and maintenance?
Many software development companies, including Fenrir, offer ongoing maintenance, bug fixes, performance optimization, security updates, feature enhancements, and technical support after project deployment. For context, it has served clients in Japan, and it has been operating since 2005.
How can I contact Fenrir for a project?
Businesses can contact Fenrir through its official website, email, or contact form to discuss project requirements, request a consultation, or receive a development estimate. For context, it has served clients in Japan, and it reports a team size of 50 - 249 professionals.
Is Fenrir an offshore software development company?
Fenrir may operate as an offshore, onshore, or hybrid software development company depending on its location and the markets it serves. For context, its listed capabilities span Custom Software Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design, Web Design and Web Development, and it has been operating since 2005.
Which countries does Fenrir serve?
Fenrir may serve clients across multiple countries and regions, including Japan, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
Can Fenrir modernize legacy software?
Fenrir may provide legacy software modernization services, including re-platforming, code refactoring, and migration to modern frameworks or cloud infrastructure to improve performance and maintainability. For context, it has served clients in Japan, and its typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149.
What is Fenrir's software development process?
Fenrir typically follows a structured software development process that may include requirement analysis, UI/UX design, agile development sprints, quality assurance testing, deployment, and post-launch support. For context, it has experience across industries such as Insurance, Retail & E-commerce, Healthcare, Travel & Hospitality, Automotive and Telecommunications, and it has served clients in Japan.
How do I request a proposal from Fenrir?
You can request a proposal from Fenrir by submitting your project requirements through its website contact form, email, or by reaching out directly to discuss your business goals and receive a tailored development estimate. For context, it has served clients in Japan, and its listed capabilities span Custom Software Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design, Web Design and Web Development.

Company Info

Founded 2005
Employees 50 - 249
Hourly Rate $100 - $149
Avg. Project Cost $50,000+
Client Rating 4.5/5 (11 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.4
Schedule
4.6
Cost
4.7
Communication
4.6