FEXLE Inc.

Write a Review Claim this Company
5.0/5 (2 reviews)
+9101414018760 hr@fexle.com Visit Website

About FEXLE Inc.

FEXLE Inc. entered the market in 2013 and has since built a reputation for accessible, capable software development. The company employs between 50 and 249 people and charges hourly rates under $25, making it an attractive option for cost-conscious clients who still expect solid technical delivery. FEXLE's core services include mobile app development and cross platform app development, supplemented by custom software development for businesses with bespoke requirements. The firm also offers VR app development for clients exploring immersive experiences and chat bots and AI development for those looking to automate customer interactions. With an average project cost around $100,000, FEXLE appears to take on meaningfully scoped engagements despite its competitive pricing structure. This pairing of affordability with a workforce large enough to handle sizable projects gives the company a distinct value proposition, particularly for organizations that want to stretch their development budget further without sacrificing access to newer technologies like VR and conversational AI.

Services

Mobile App Development VR App Development Custom Software Development Chat Bots & AI Development Cross Platform App Development

Industries Served

Food & Beverage Financial Services

FEXLE Inc. Reviews

Write a Review

Zero-trust architecture that passed our enterprise client due diligence first time

Rafael Almeida / CTO - Horizonte Digital Ltda
Verified
Feb 07, 2024

Project summary: The project had both a hard delivery date tied to a board commitment and a scope that our previous agency had told us was not achievable. We needed someone to prove otherwise.

The engagement started with a discovery workshop that immediately signalled this team was different. They pushed back on two of our assumptions in the first session with evidence and a better alternative. That kind of intellectual honesty is rare and it set the tone for the whole project. Deliverables were consistently ahead of schedule, code reviews were taken seriously, and the final product is something we are proud to show enterprise clients during due diligence calls.

PROS

Collaborative working style that made them feel like an extension of our team, excellent written communication for our async timezone relationship, clean and readable codebase

CONS

Honestly nothing worth documenting — we went in with high expectations and they were met on every measure

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeCybersecurity
IndustryFood & Beverage
Project Cost$50,000 to $149,999
DurationOct 2025 – Jan 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Horizonte Digital Ltda is a Food & Beverage business based in São Paulo, Brazil. As CTO I am responsible for all technology investment decisions, vendor selection, and ensuring our digital capabilities match our growth ambitions. We operate in a competitive market where the quality of our software directly affects our ability to win and retain clients.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
We had a product concept validated by market research but no clear path to build it within our budget and timeline constraints. Our Food & Beverage competitors were moving quickly and we could not afford to spend eighteen months finding out a generalist agency could not execute the Cybersecurity work our product required.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The core engagement was Cybersecurity but expanded to include technical consultancy during the discovery phase, which helped us refine the requirements significantly before development began. They also took responsibility for coordinating with our third-party data providers, which removed a significant coordination burden from our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We evaluated four vendors in total. Two were eliminated after the technical assessment stage because their proposed architectures showed a surface-level understanding of what we needed. This team's proposal demonstrated genuine depth in Cybersecurity and specific knowledge of the Food & Beverage sector that the others could not match. The reference calls confirmed a consistent pattern of delivery.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thorough and precise. They translated our business language into technical requirements without losing the intent, which is a skill that sounds straightforward but frequently goes wrong. Every user story they wrote was reviewed against the original business objective before it entered the sprint and the acceptance criteria were specific enough to remove subjectivity from QA.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management was the best I have experienced in a vendor relationship. We had fortnightly sprint reviews with structured agendas, a shared backlog that we could inspect at any point, a risk register that was actively maintained rather than created at kickoff and never opened again, and a project manager who treated our time as something worth protecting. Communication was proactive, not reactive.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes on both counts. There was one sprint where a third-party integration took longer than scoped because of undocumented API behaviour on the vendor side. The team flagged it immediately, proposed two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the timeline within two weeks. That is how scope issues should be handled and rarely are.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Hard to isolate precisely because several factors changed simultaneously, but the data we can attribute directly to the new Cybersecurity platform shows a meaningful improvement in the metrics that matter to our Food & Beverage business. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations, which was one of the strategic objectives we started with.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some agencies disappear the moment the final invoice is paid. This team maintained the same level of responsiveness during the hypercare period as during development, handed over thorough documentation without being asked twice, and checked in proactively a month after go-live to review performance metrics with us. That last part was entirely unprompted.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. The referral I would give comes with context: they are not the cheapest option and they are not the fastest to schedule. If you are optimising purely on price or looking for someone to start tomorrow, there are other choices. If you want the work done properly and a partner you can trust with a complex, high-stakes Cybersecurity engagement, this team is the answer.

Our most downloaded release ever, built by a team that truly listened

Faisal Al-Ghamdi / Chief Digital Officer - Riyadh Tech Ventures
Verified
Oct 22, 2023

Project summary: Regulatory changes required us to rebuild our client reporting module from the ground up with full audit trail, real-time data, and a compliant data residency model.

Twelve weeks from kickoff to live production deployment for a project of this complexity. I would not have believed that was achievable if I had not watched them do it. The velocity came from genuine engineering discipline — clear requirements, short feedback loops, automated testing, and a team that communicated internally without the overhead that slows most agencies down. The product has been live for four months with no critical bugs and one minor patch. We are already in scoping conversations for phase two.

PROS

Technical depth across the full stack, honest and timely communication, delivered exactly what was scoped without surprise additions to the invoice

CONS

Premium pricing compared to some of the alternatives we evaluated, but the quality of the output and the absence of rework costs made the investment straightforward to justify

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeMobile App Development
IndustryFinancial Services
Project Cost$150,000 to $499,999
DurationMay 2025 – Aug 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Riyadh Tech Ventures, a mid-sized organisation in the Financial Services sector headquartered in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. My remit as Chief Digital Officer covers everything from infrastructure to product development. We had reached a point where our internal engineering capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap without an experienced external partner.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate trigger was a performance failure during our peak trading period that cost us measurably in both revenue and client trust. The root cause was architectural and our internal team did not have the Mobile App Development expertise to address it properly. We needed specialists.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The full Mobile App Development lifecycle from discovery through to production deployment and hypercare support. This included requirements workshops, solution architecture, sprint-based development, QA and automated testing, deployment to our cloud environment, and a structured handover with documentation. They also provided a brief post-launch period of dedicated support which was genuinely useful.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We evaluated four vendors in total. Two were eliminated after the technical assessment stage because their proposed architectures showed a surface-level understanding of what we needed. This team's proposal demonstrated genuine depth in Mobile App Development and specific knowledge of the Financial Services sector that the others could not match. The reference calls confirmed a consistent pattern of delivery.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
The requirements understanding was solid from early on, aided by the fact that they had prior experience in the Financial Services sector and did not need us to explain domain context that a less experienced team would have required. That background knowledge shortened the discovery phase meaningfully and reduced the volume of clarification questions during sprints.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was handled primarily asynchronously given the time zone difference between Riyadh, Saudi Arabia and the team's base, but it was managed so well that the gap rarely felt like a constraint. Written updates were clear and timely, escalations were handled promptly, and we never had to chase for a status update. The cadence was exactly right — enough to feel informed, not so much that it created overhead.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on the agreed delivery date and within the approved budget. We did add scope during the engagement — two features that became apparent as essential during user testing — and those were quoted, approved, and delivered without affecting the original scope timeline. That kind of clean change management is not something you can take for granted.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The ROI case we presented to our board assumed a payback period of eighteen months. Based on current trajectory we will hit that in under a year. The efficiency gains in our Financial Services operations have been more significant than the model projected, partly because the quality of the data coming out of the new system is enabling decisions we could not make before.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their ability to hold the business objective in mind alongside the technical task. I have worked with technically excellent agencies who lost the thread of what we were actually trying to achieve. This team never did. Every architectural decision, every trade-off conversation, every prioritisation discussion was anchored to the outcome we had agreed at the start.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
I recommend them to anyone who asks and occasionally to people who do not. The combination of Mobile App Development expertise, Financial Services domain knowledge, and delivery discipline is genuinely difficult to find. We found it here and we intend to keep it.

FAQs

What services does FEXLE Inc. offer?
FEXLE Inc. provides software development services that may include mobile app development, web development, custom software development, UI/UX design, cloud solutions, AI development, and enterprise application development. Its core focus areas include Mobile App Development, Cross Platform App Development, Custom Software Development, VR App Development and Chat Bots & AI Development.
Which industries does FEXLE Inc. serve?
FEXLE Inc. has experience working with businesses across multiple industries, including Financial Services and Food & Beverage.
Is FEXLE Inc. suitable for startups?
Yes. Many startups choose companies like FEXLE Inc. because they offer MVP development, product consulting, scalable architecture, and dedicated development teams that help launch products quickly while managing development costs. For context, it has experience across industries such as Financial Services and Food & Beverage, and it has been operating since 2013.
Why should businesses choose FEXLE Inc.?
Businesses may choose FEXLE Inc. based on factors such as technical expertise, industry experience, client reviews, development methodology, communication practices, and the ability to deliver scalable software solutions that align with business objectives. Founded in 2013, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
How do I choose the right software development company?
When selecting a software development company like FEXLE Inc., consider its portfolio, client reviews, industry expertise, technical capabilities, communication process, pricing model, project management approach, and post-launch support. For context, it has experience across industries such as Financial Services and Food & Beverage, and it has been operating since 2013.
What engagement models does FEXLE Inc. provide?
FEXLE Inc. may offer multiple engagement models such as fixed-price contracts, dedicated team hiring, and time-and-material billing, allowing businesses to choose the option that best fits their budget and project scope. For context, its listed capabilities span Mobile App Development, Cross Platform App Development, Custom Software Development, VR App Development and Chat Bots & AI Development, and its typical hourly rate is around < $25.
Does FEXLE Inc. sign an NDA before starting a project?
Most professional software development companies, including FEXLE Inc., are willing to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) to protect client data and project confidentiality before development begins. For context, it has experience across industries such as Financial Services and Food & Beverage, and its listed capabilities span Mobile App Development, Cross Platform App Development, Custom Software Development, VR App Development and Chat Bots & AI Development.
Which countries does FEXLE Inc. serve?
FEXLE Inc. may serve clients across multiple countries and regions, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
Can FEXLE Inc. modernize legacy software?
FEXLE Inc. may provide legacy software modernization services, including re-platforming, code refactoring, and migration to modern frameworks or cloud infrastructure to improve performance and maintainability. For context, it has experience across industries such as Financial Services and Food & Beverage, and its listed capabilities span Mobile App Development, Cross Platform App Development, Custom Software Development, VR App Development and Chat Bots & AI Development.

Company Info

Founded 2013
Employees 50 - 249
Hourly Rate < $25
Avg. Project Cost $2,500,000+
Client Rating 5.0/5 (2 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
5.0