About Hudson Integrated
Hudson Integrated works with clients to plan, build, and ship digital products. Hudson Integrated focuses on Digital Marketing and UI/UX Design. Its team includes 10 - 49 specialists working across design, development, and delivery. Typical hourly rates run around $150 - $199/hr, with an average project cost near $25,000. This gives a quick snapshot of what to expect when working with Hudson Integrated.
Services
Industries Served
Hudson Integrated Reviews
Write a ReviewPredictive analytics that gave us an edge we had never had before
Priscilla Tan / Head of Engineering - AsiaPac FinTech Pte LtdAug 24, 2025
Project summary: Citizen-facing services that had been paper-based for decades needed to be digitised in a way that was genuinely accessible to all demographics, not just the digitally confident.
I am a demanding client. I have a technical background, I review code, and I have high standards for documentation and testing. This team met all of those expectations without ever seeming defensive about scrutiny. Peer code reviews were welcomed, unit test coverage was genuine rather than performative, and the API documentation was thorough enough that our own developers integrated against it without a single clarification call. That level of craft is what I look for and rarely find.
Domain knowledge that went beyond generic expertise into our specific industry, willingness to push back constructively, automated test coverage that gave us deployment confidence
Premium pricing compared to some of the alternatives we evaluated, but the quality of the output and the absence of rework costs made the investment straightforward to justify
Questions & Answers
Full-funnel digital programme that aligned our marketing and sales teams
Lachlan Burgess / Chief Digital Officer - Harbour Digital Pty LtdOct 09, 2024
Project summary: Our hospital network required a unified patient data platform that could integrate with existing EMR systems while meeting all relevant data protection obligations.
I am a demanding client. I have a technical background, I review code, and I have high standards for documentation and testing. This team met all of those expectations without ever seeming defensive about scrutiny. Peer code reviews were welcomed, unit test coverage was genuine rather than performative, and the API documentation was thorough enough that our own developers integrated against it without a single clarification call. That level of craft is what I look for and rarely find.
Technical depth across the full stack, honest and timely communication, delivered exactly what was scoped without surprise additions to the invoice
The volume of quality documentation they produced was genuinely impressive but also meant our team needed dedicated time to review it properly — a minor process point, not a complaint