INFINTOR

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.0/5 (12 reviews)
+97430051818 N/A Visit Website

About INFINTOR

Their success is driven by a powerful team of experts with expertise in web technologies, software development & Open source technologies. They have the manpower to provide to their customer’s needs. They assure you solutions to support, extend, create and together implement an economic increase to your company at a global level. They strive to connect the latest technology with no reduction in the compactness of app development.

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development UI-UX Design Web Design Branding E-commerce Development

Industries Served

Insurance Financial Services

INFINTOR Reviews

Write a Review

E-commerce build that united our digital and in-store inventory for the first time

Takashi Morimoto / Director of IT Strategy - Sakura Digital KK
Verified
Jan 17, 2026

Project summary: First notice of loss processing was taking three days on average. Market benchmarks were under four hours. Automation of the intake and triage workflow was the agreed priority.

The thing that retrospectively seems most significant is how little drama there was. Complex technology projects tend to accumulate incidents, escalations, and tense conversations. This one did not. Problems were surfaced before they became incidents. Scope changes were handled with process rather than conflict. Risks were managed rather than avoided. That level of maturity is rare in my experience and it made the delivery feel almost effortless from our side, which I know it was not from theirs.

PROS

Collaborative culture that made the team feel like a genuine extension of our organisation, strong asynchronous communication across time zones, zero-drama handling of the inevitable mid-project changes

CONS

Time zone coordination required some deliberate overlap management from both sides in the first couple of sprints, after which we had an efficient async rhythm that worked for the whole project

4.0
Overall
4.0
Quality
4.0
Schedule
4.0
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeE-commerce Development
IndustryInsurance
Project Cost$150,000 to $499,999
DurationMar 2025 – Oct 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Sakura Digital KK operates in the Insurance sector with headquarters in Tokyo, Japan. In my role as Director of IT Strategy I am accountable for the full technology agenda — infrastructure, product, and vendor relationships. We are a commercially driven organisation and every technology decision is evaluated against a clear business case before it is approved.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
A competitive threat had accelerated our roadmap. We had planned a significant E-commerce Development investment for the following year. External pressure moved that timeline forward by six months and required us to find an external partner rather than attempting to build internally in the time available.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end E-commerce Development delivery with particular depth in the integration and data migration components, which were the highest-risk elements of the programme. They supplemented this with a dedicated QA resource throughout development and a documented runbook for our operations team at handover.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We ran a structured shortlisting process across five vendors. The technical evaluation eliminated two immediately. Of the remaining three, this team's proposal was differentiated by the specificity of their E-commerce Development approach and the evidence base they provided — reference projects in Insurance contexts, not generic case studies. The reference calls confirmed a track record that the proposal had described accurately.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thoroughly and precisely. The requirements document they produced was detailed enough that our QA team used it directly to write acceptance criteria. Every user story had a defined business objective attached. Nothing was left to interpretation. That discipline in the requirements phase paid dividends throughout development and testing.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I had privately built a contingency expectation into my planning given the project complexity and the number of integrations involved. None of that contingency was needed. The delivery landed on the agreed date and the final invoice matched the approved budget to within a fraction of a percent. That outcome is rarer than the industry acknowledges.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live four months ago. User adoption exceeded the target we had set by 23 percent in the first month. Support ticket volume has dropped measurably. The features we had deferred because the previous architecture made them prohibitively expensive to build are now in development. The platform they built has opened our roadmap.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active scoping conversations for a second engagement and I expect this to develop into a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Insurance sector looking for E-commerce Development expertise combined with genuine delivery discipline, I would put this team at the top of the evaluation list.

Performance marketing that delivered measurable ROAS from the first campaign

Maximilian Schreiber / Director of IT - Schreiber Logistik GmbH
Verified
Sep 27, 2024

Project summary: Our wealth management platform was built on ten-year-old architecture and was starting to limit our ability to onboard new institutional clients with modern integration expectations.

Twelve weeks from kickoff to live production deployment for a project of this complexity. I would not have believed that was achievable if I had not watched them do it. The velocity came from genuine engineering discipline — clear requirements, short feedback loops, automated testing, and a team that communicated internally without the overhead that slows most agencies down. The product has been live for four months with no critical bugs and one minor patch. We are already in scoping conversations for phase two.

PROS

Architectural decisions that will serve us for years rather than just solving the immediate problem, knowledge transfer that left our team genuinely capable, no scope creep at all

CONS

We underestimated the internal resource commitment required on our side during discovery — the team warned us, we did not listen fully, and the first sprint was slower as a result

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeDigital Marketing
IndustryFinancial Services
Project Cost$150,000 to $499,999
DurationFeb 2025 – Jun 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As Director of IT at Schreiber Logistik GmbH, I manage a cross-functional technology team serving our Financial Services clients from Hamburg, Germany. We are a commercially focused organisation and every technology decision we make is evaluated against a clear business case. We needed a partner who understood that context, not just the technical brief.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Growth into new markets had exposed serious limitations in our platform. What had worked for our original user base in Hamburg, Germany was not going to scale internationally, and the Digital Marketing requirements for those new markets were meaningfully different. We needed a partner who had solved that kind of problem before.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The core engagement was Digital Marketing but expanded to include technical consultancy during the discovery phase, which helped us refine the requirements significantly before development began. They also took responsibility for coordinating with our third-party data providers, which removed a significant coordination burden from our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
Their portfolio included two projects that were sufficiently close to our own brief in terms of complexity, Digital Marketing scope, and Financial Services context that we felt confident they understood what we were asking. The proposal was technically rigorous, the pricing was transparent, and the proposed team structure gave us senior engineers throughout rather than just for the pitch.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
The requirements understanding was solid from early on, aided by the fact that they had prior experience in the Financial Services sector and did not need us to explain domain context that a less experienced team would have required. That background knowledge shortened the discovery phase meaningfully and reduced the volume of clarification questions during sprints.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management was the best I have experienced in a vendor relationship. We had fortnightly sprint reviews with structured agendas, a shared backlog that we could inspect at any point, a risk register that was actively maintained rather than created at kickoff and never opened again, and a project manager who treated our time as something worth protecting. Communication was proactive, not reactive.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I will note that the original timeline was aggressive and I had privately expected a slip. They managed to hold it by making smart sequencing decisions early on that I only fully understood in retrospect. The budget discipline was equally good — we received a single change request for scope we had introduced ourselves and it was priced fairly.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantitatively: user engagement metrics are up significantly since launch, our support ticket volume has dropped, and we have received unsolicited positive feedback from clients who noticed the improvement. Qualitatively: our internal team is proud of the product we now have, which affects morale and retention in ways that do not show up on a dashboard but matter enormously.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The intellectual honesty. They told us when something we wanted was a bad idea and explained why. They told us when a timeline was tight and gave us options. They did not tell us what we wanted to hear in order to win work or avoid a difficult conversation. In a long engagement that kind of relationship is far more valuable than an agency that just says yes.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. I would recommend them with a specific note that the quality of the discovery process is where the value starts. Clients who invest properly in that phase will get the most out of the engagement. We made that investment and the returns are evident in the quality of what was delivered.

FAQs

How much does it cost to hire INFINTOR?
The cost of hiring INFINTOR depends on factors such as project complexity, development hours, required technologies, team size, and engagement model. Based on available data, INFINTOR's typical hourly rate is around N/A, with an average project cost of $2500000+.
Which industries does INFINTOR serve?
INFINTOR has experience working with businesses across multiple industries, including Nonprofit & NGO, Financial Services, Logistics & Supply Chain, Healthcare, Travel & Hospitality and Food & Beverage.
How long does INFINTOR take to complete a software project?
Project timelines vary depending on scope and complexity. A simple MVP may take a few weeks, while enterprise software or large-scale digital transformation projects can require several months of development, testing, and deployment. With a team of 10 - 49 professionals, INFINTOR can scale resources based on project urgency.
Does INFINTOR provide post-launch support and maintenance?
Many software development companies, including INFINTOR, offer ongoing maintenance, bug fixes, performance optimization, security updates, feature enhancements, and technical support after project deployment. For context, it has experience across industries such as Nonprofit & NGO, Financial Services, Logistics & Supply Chain, Healthcare, Travel & Hospitality and Food & Beverage, and it has been operating since 2014.
How do I choose the right software development company?
When selecting a software development company like INFINTOR, consider its portfolio, client reviews, industry expertise, technical capabilities, communication process, pricing model, project management approach, and post-launch support. For context, its listed capabilities span Branding, E-commerce Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design and Web Design, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
Is INFINTOR an offshore software development company?
INFINTOR may operate as an offshore, onshore, or hybrid software development company depending on its location and the markets it serves. For context, it has served clients in Qatar, and its typical hourly rate is around N/A.
Does INFINTOR offer dedicated developers?
Yes, many companies like INFINTOR provide a dedicated developer hiring model, allowing businesses to scale their in-house team with experienced professionals who work exclusively on their project. For context, it has served clients in Qatar, and its typical hourly rate is around N/A.
What engagement models does INFINTOR provide?
INFINTOR may offer multiple engagement models such as fixed-price contracts, dedicated team hiring, and time-and-material billing, allowing businesses to choose the option that best fits their budget and project scope. For context, its listed capabilities span Branding, E-commerce Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design and Web Design, and it has experience across industries such as Nonprofit & NGO, Financial Services, Logistics & Supply Chain, Healthcare, Travel & Hospitality and Food & Beverage.
Can INFINTOR build AI-powered applications?
Many modern software development companies, including INFINTOR, offer AI and machine learning integration services such as chatbots, predictive analytics, computer vision, and intelligent automation. For context, it has served clients in Qatar, and its listed capabilities span Branding, E-commerce Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design and Web Design.
Can INFINTOR modernize legacy software?
INFINTOR may provide legacy software modernization services, including re-platforming, code refactoring, and migration to modern frameworks or cloud infrastructure to improve performance and maintainability. For context, it has served clients in Qatar, and it has experience across industries such as Nonprofit & NGO, Financial Services, Logistics & Supply Chain, Healthcare, Travel & Hospitality and Food & Beverage.

Company Info

Founded 2014
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate N/A
Avg. Project Cost $25,000+
Client Rating 4.0/5 (12 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.0
Schedule
4.0
Cost
4.0
Communication
4.1