About Jentroy

Jentroy Uganda is a good mobile app development company. It is a global leader in software solutions that help IT transform traditional businesses into digital enterprises for the ultimate rival advantage. Their clients by delivering innovative custom and packaged solutions designed for their unique business demands. They analyze every aspect of your industry and apply their crafting expertise to provide a roadmap for success.

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development UI-UX Design Web Design E-commerce Development Social Media Marketing SEO

Industries Served

Government & Public Sector Fashion & Apparel

Jentroy Reviews

Write a Review

Custom editorial tooling that fits how our team actually works

Priscilla Tan / Head of Engineering - AsiaPac FinTech Pte Ltd
Verified
Aug 10, 2025

Project summary: Citizen-facing services that had been paper-based for decades needed to be digitised in a way that was genuinely accessible to all demographics, not just the digitally confident.

The thing I appreciate most in retrospect is that they were honest when something was harder than expected. Twice during the project the team came to us proactively to say that a particular component needed more time to do properly and explained why cutting corners would create problems later. We gave them the time. Both decisions were correct. The resulting product is solid and we have had none of the post-launch instability that plagued our last two technology projects.

PROS

Architectural decisions that will serve us for years rather than just solving the immediate problem, knowledge transfer that left our team genuinely capable, no scope creep at all

CONS

Their calendar books up quickly which made scheduling the initial kickoff slightly challenging — a good problem for them to have and not one that affected our delivery

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeCMS Development
IndustryGovernment & Public Sector
Project Cost$150,000 to $499,999
DurationJan 2025 – Mar 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at AsiaPac FinTech Pte Ltd, a mid-sized organisation in the Government & Public Sector sector headquartered in Singapore. My remit as Head of Engineering covers everything from infrastructure to product development. We had reached a point where our internal engineering capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap without an experienced external partner.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our existing CMS Development capability had accumulated years of technical debt that was slowing every new feature to a crawl. Incident frequency was rising, developer confidence was falling, and we knew a rebuild was overdue. We needed a partner with the depth to do it properly rather than apply another layer of patches.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily CMS Development, though the scope naturally touched adjacent areas. They handled architecture design, implementation, integration with our existing systems, performance testing under realistic load, and knowledge transfer to our internal team. The breadth of what they covered without requiring us to bring in additional vendors was one of the reasons the project ran efficiently.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
Price was a factor but not the deciding one. They were mid-range in our evaluation. What tipped it was the combination of their technical depth in CMS Development, the seniority of the team they proposed to assign to our account, and the clarity of their project governance model. We had been burned by an agency that overpromised before and we needed to see evidence of process maturity.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Better than we did at the start, which sounds like an exaggeration but is genuinely accurate. The discovery workshop they ran surfaced assumptions we had not examined and contradictions in our requirements that would have caused real problems mid-development. The functional specification they produced was the clearest articulation of our product that we had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. We used a shared project management tool that gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every meeting. The project manager had a clear escalation path and used it appropriately. The only time I needed to intervene directly was when I chose to, not because something had been missed.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on the agreed delivery date and within the approved budget. We did add scope during the engagement — two features that became apparent as essential during user testing — and those were quoted, approved, and delivered without affecting the original scope timeline. That kind of clean change management is not something you can take for granted.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is that the problem we hired them to solve no longer exists. Beyond that, the new CMS Development platform has reduced our operational overhead measurably, our team spends less time managing incidents and more time on product development, and we have been able to onboard two new enterprise clients who had previously cited our technical limitations as a barrier.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who scoped the work were the engineers who built it. That sounds like it should be standard practice but in my experience it often is not. The institutional knowledge that comes from that continuity pays dividends at every stage, particularly when you are dealing with a complex Government & Public Sector domain where context takes time to build.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
I recommend them to anyone who asks and occasionally to people who do not. The combination of CMS Development expertise, Government & Public Sector domain knowledge, and delivery discipline is genuinely difficult to find. We found it here and we intend to keep it.

Tokenisation project executed with precision and deep domain understanding

Zoe Carmichael / Head of Innovation - Red Centre Technologies
Verified
Jan 27, 2024

Project summary: We had a clear product vision but lacked the engineering capacity internally to execute it within the window our market opportunity required.

Twelve weeks from kickoff to live production deployment for a project of this complexity. I would not have believed that was achievable if I had not watched them do it. The velocity came from genuine engineering discipline — clear requirements, short feedback loops, automated testing, and a team that communicated internally without the overhead that slows most agencies down. The product has been live for four months with no critical bugs and one minor patch. We are already in scoping conversations for phase two.

PROS

Domain knowledge that went beyond generic expertise into our specific industry, willingness to push back constructively, automated test coverage that gave us deployment confidence

CONS

Their calendar books up quickly which made scheduling the initial kickoff slightly challenging — a good problem for them to have and not one that affected our delivery

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeBlockchain Development
IndustryFashion & Apparel
Project Cost$150,000 to $499,999
DurationJul 2025 – Feb 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Red Centre Technologies is a Fashion & Apparel business based in Melbourne, Australia. As Head of Innovation I am responsible for all technology investment decisions, vendor selection, and ensuring our digital capabilities match our growth ambitions. We operate in a competitive market where the quality of our software directly affects our ability to win and retain clients.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
We had a product concept validated by market research but no clear path to build it within our budget and timeline constraints. Our Fashion & Apparel competitors were moving quickly and we could not afford to spend eighteen months finding out a generalist agency could not execute the Blockchain Development work our product required.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end Blockchain Development delivery with a particular emphasis on the integration layer that connected the new build to our existing Fashion & Apparel infrastructure. They also provided UI/UX input that was not in the original scope but which they offered proactively because they could see it would affect adoption. That kind of initiative was characteristic of how they approached the whole engagement.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
Price was a factor but not the deciding one. They were mid-range in our evaluation. What tipped it was the combination of their technical depth in Blockchain Development, the seniority of the team they proposed to assign to our account, and the clarity of their project governance model. We had been burned by an agency that overpromised before and we needed to see evidence of process maturity.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thorough and precise. They translated our business language into technical requirements without losing the intent, which is a skill that sounds straightforward but frequently goes wrong. Every user story they wrote was reviewed against the original business objective before it entered the sprint and the acceptance criteria were specific enough to remove subjectivity from QA.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. We used a shared project management tool that gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every meeting. The project manager had a clear escalation path and used it appropriately. The only time I needed to intervene directly was when I chose to, not because something had been missed.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes on both counts. There was one sprint where a third-party integration took longer than scoped because of undocumented API behaviour on the vendor side. The team flagged it immediately, proposed two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the timeline within two weeks. That is how scope issues should be handled and rarely are.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Hard to isolate precisely because several factors changed simultaneously, but the data we can attribute directly to the new Blockchain Development platform shows a meaningful improvement in the metrics that matter to our Fashion & Apparel business. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations, which was one of the strategic objectives we started with.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The intellectual honesty. They told us when something we wanted was a bad idea and explained why. They told us when a timeline was tight and gave us options. They did not tell us what we wanted to hear in order to win work or avoid a difficult conversation. In a long engagement that kind of relationship is far more valuable than an agency that just says yes.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. The referral I would give comes with context: they are not the cheapest option and they are not the fastest to schedule. If you are optimising purely on price or looking for someone to start tomorrow, there are other choices. If you want the work done properly and a partner you can trust with a complex, high-stakes Blockchain Development engagement, this team is the answer.

FAQs

How much does it cost to hire Jentroy?
The cost of hiring Jentroy depends on factors such as project complexity, development hours, required technologies, team size, and engagement model. Based on available data, Jentroy's typical hourly rate is around N/A, with an average project cost of $10000+.
Is Jentroy suitable for startups?
Yes. Many startups choose companies like Jentroy because they offer MVP development, product consulting, scalable architecture, and dedicated development teams that help launch products quickly while managing development costs. For context, it has experience across industries such as Fashion & Apparel, Government & Public Sector, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Retail & E-commerce, Gaming & Gambling and Insurance, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
Why should businesses choose Jentroy?
Businesses may choose Jentroy based on factors such as technical expertise, industry experience, client reviews, development methodology, communication practices, and the ability to deliver scalable software solutions that align with business objectives. Founded in 2014, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
How can I contact Jentroy for a project?
Businesses can contact Jentroy through its official website, email, or contact form to discuss project requirements, request a consultation, or receive a development estimate. For context, its listed capabilities span E-commerce Development, Mobile App Development, SEO, Social Media Marketing and UI-UX Design, and its typical hourly rate is around N/A.
Is Jentroy an offshore software development company?
Jentroy may operate as an offshore, onshore, or hybrid software development company depending on its location and the markets it serves. For context, it has served clients in Uganda, and its listed capabilities span E-commerce Development, Mobile App Development, SEO, Social Media Marketing and UI-UX Design.
Does Jentroy offer dedicated developers?
Yes, many companies like Jentroy provide a dedicated developer hiring model, allowing businesses to scale their in-house team with experienced professionals who work exclusively on their project. For context, it has experience across industries such as Fashion & Apparel, Government & Public Sector, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Retail & E-commerce, Gaming & Gambling and Insurance, and it has served clients in Uganda.
Can Jentroy build AI-powered applications?
Many modern software development companies, including Jentroy, offer AI and machine learning integration services such as chatbots, predictive analytics, computer vision, and intelligent automation. For context, it has experience across industries such as Fashion & Apparel, Government & Public Sector, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Retail & E-commerce, Gaming & Gambling and Insurance, and it has served clients in Uganda.
Does Jentroy sign an NDA before starting a project?
Most professional software development companies, including Jentroy, are willing to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) to protect client data and project confidentiality before development begins. For context, its listed capabilities span E-commerce Development, Mobile App Development, SEO, Social Media Marketing and UI-UX Design, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
Can Jentroy modernize legacy software?
Jentroy may provide legacy software modernization services, including re-platforming, code refactoring, and migration to modern frameworks or cloud infrastructure to improve performance and maintainability. For context, its listed capabilities span E-commerce Development, Mobile App Development, SEO, Social Media Marketing and UI-UX Design, and it has been operating since 2014.
How do I request a proposal from Jentroy?
You can request a proposal from Jentroy by submitting your project requirements through its website contact form, email, or by reaching out directly to discuss your business goals and receive a tailored development estimate. For context, it has experience across industries such as Fashion & Apparel, Government & Public Sector, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Retail & E-commerce, Gaming & Gambling and Insurance, and it has served clients in Uganda.

Company Info

Founded 2014
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate N/A
Avg. Project Cost $50,000+
Client Rating 4.4/5 (12 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.3
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.5
Communication
4.5