About LeewayHertz
LeewayHertz is a technology company founded in 2007. The company's main offerings are Mobile App Development. LeewayHertz employs 500 - 999 people. Clients can expect pricing around $100 - $149/hr, with projects averaging about $35,000. This profile is a starting point — reach out to LeewayHertz directly to discuss project specifics.
Where We Specialize
Industry Expertise
Typical Project Size
LeewayHertz Reviews
Write a ReviewBlockchain expertise that came with clear explanations, not just technical jargon
Nora Al-Otaibi / VP of Engineering - Salam Digital SolutionsJan 31, 2026
Project summary: Unplanned downtime had become our single largest cost driver and our data showed that predictive maintenance could address the majority of it — if we had the right infrastructure to act on it.
Six months after go-live our platform is processing three times the transaction volume we specified in the original brief. The architecture choices made during discovery accommodated that growth without remediation work. That is the difference between a team that designs for what you tell them and a team that designs for what you are likely to need. We are in conversation about a Phase 2 engagement and I expect to be using this partnership for several years.
Commercially transparent throughout — no hidden assumptions, no bill shock at the end, change requests that were fair and clearly explained rather than used as a margin-recovery mechanism
Time zone coordination required some deliberate overlap management from both sides in the first couple of sprints, after which we had an efficient async rhythm that worked for the whole project
Questions & Answers
A technology investment that delivered returns ahead of the business case we approved
Erik Lindqvist / Chief Technology Officer - Nordic Cloud ABJan 26, 2026
Project summary: B2B customer churn was concentrated among accounts that had complained about portal usability. We needed a complete redesign of the self-service experience before the next contract renewal cycle.
The thing that retrospectively seems most significant is how little drama there was. Complex technology projects tend to accumulate incidents, escalations, and tense conversations. This one did not. Problems were surfaced before they became incidents. Scope changes were handled with process rather than conflict. Risks were managed rather than avoided. That level of maturity is rare in my experience and it made the delivery feel almost effortless from our side, which I know it was not from theirs.
Architectural decisions designed for longevity rather than just the current brief, thorough automated test coverage, post-launch stability that validated every technical choice made during discovery
Time zone coordination required some deliberate overlap management from both sides in the first couple of sprints, after which we had an efficient async rhythm that worked for the whole project