About LeewayHertz

LeewayHertz is a technology company founded in 2007. The company's main offerings are Mobile App Development. LeewayHertz employs 500 - 999 people. Clients can expect pricing around $100 - $149/hr, with projects averaging about $35,000. This profile is a starting point — reach out to LeewayHertz directly to discuss project specifics.

Where We Specialize

37% Mobile App Development
Mobile App Development 37%
Web Development 25%
UI-UX Design 21%
IoT Development 17%

Industry Expertise

Travel52% Hospitality48%

Typical Project Size

53% Midmarket Business
39% Small Business
8% Enterprise

LeewayHertz Reviews

Write a Review

Blockchain expertise that came with clear explanations, not just technical jargon

Nora Al-Otaibi / VP of Engineering - Salam Digital Solutions
Verified
Jan 31, 2026

Project summary: Unplanned downtime had become our single largest cost driver and our data showed that predictive maintenance could address the majority of it — if we had the right infrastructure to act on it.

Six months after go-live our platform is processing three times the transaction volume we specified in the original brief. The architecture choices made during discovery accommodated that growth without remediation work. That is the difference between a team that designs for what you tell them and a team that designs for what you are likely to need. We are in conversation about a Phase 2 engagement and I expect to be using this partnership for several years.

PROS

Commercially transparent throughout — no hidden assumptions, no bill shock at the end, change requests that were fair and clearly explained rather than used as a margin-recovery mechanism

CONS

Time zone coordination required some deliberate overlap management from both sides in the first couple of sprints, after which we had an efficient async rhythm that worked for the whole project

4.5
Overall
4.0
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.5
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeBlockchain Development
IndustryManufacturing
Project Cost$10,000 to $49,999
DurationMar 2025 – Oct 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Salam Digital Solutions is an established Manufacturing organisation headquartered in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. My role as VP of Engineering covers both strategic planning and operational technology delivery. We maintain high standards for our vendors because our clients hold us to high standards — a bar we expect our partners to meet.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate problem was that our Blockchain Development capability had become the bottleneck limiting our ability to grow. Every feature request, every new client requirement, every internal initiative was delayed by a platform that had been extended beyond its original design. We needed a rebuild, not a patch.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The scope covered the full Blockchain Development lifecycle: discovery and requirements definition, solution architecture, iterative development across twelve sprints, integration testing, performance validation, production deployment, and a structured four-week hypercare period. They also provided system documentation and a knowledge transfer programme for our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
A trusted peer in the Manufacturing sector had used them for a comparable Blockchain Development engagement and their recommendation was unequivocal. Our own due diligence confirmed the pattern they described. The combination of domain knowledge, Blockchain Development depth, and demonstrated delivery discipline was the deciding factor.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I had privately built a contingency expectation into my planning given the project complexity and the number of integrations involved. None of that contingency was needed. The delivery landed on the agreed date and the final invoice matched the approved budget to within a fraction of a percent. That outcome is rarer than the industry acknowledges.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantifying the impact precisely is complicated by other variables in our business, but the metrics we can attribute directly to the Blockchain Development work are meaningful: session duration up, conversion rate up, error rate down, and our NPS for the digital touchpoint has improved by eleven points. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who participated in the discovery sessions were the engineers who built the system. That consistency of institutional knowledge across a six-month project has a value that is difficult to quantify but easy to notice when it is absent. Every conversation built on the previous ones.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. I would add the context that this is not the cheapest option in the market and they are selective about the engagements they take on. If your primary criterion is price, there are alternatives. If you want a technology partner who can be trusted with a complex Blockchain Development programme in the Manufacturing space and will deliver against a serious brief, this is the team.

A technology investment that delivered returns ahead of the business case we approved

Erik Lindqvist / Chief Technology Officer - Nordic Cloud AB
Verified
Jan 26, 2026

Project summary: B2B customer churn was concentrated among accounts that had complained about portal usability. We needed a complete redesign of the self-service experience before the next contract renewal cycle.

The thing that retrospectively seems most significant is how little drama there was. Complex technology projects tend to accumulate incidents, escalations, and tense conversations. This one did not. Problems were surfaced before they became incidents. Scope changes were handled with process rather than conflict. Risks were managed rather than avoided. That level of maturity is rare in my experience and it made the delivery feel almost effortless from our side, which I know it was not from theirs.

PROS

Architectural decisions designed for longevity rather than just the current brief, thorough automated test coverage, post-launch stability that validated every technical choice made during discovery

CONS

Time zone coordination required some deliberate overlap management from both sides in the first couple of sprints, after which we had an efficient async rhythm that worked for the whole project

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
4.5
Schedule
5.0
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeIndustry-Specific Solutions
IndustryTelecommunications
Project Cost$10,000 to $49,999
DurationMay 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Nordic Cloud AB is an established Telecommunications organisation headquartered in Stockholm, Sweden. My role as Chief Technology Officer covers both strategic planning and operational technology delivery. We maintain high standards for our vendors because our clients hold us to high standards — a bar we expect our partners to meet.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Regulatory requirements in our Telecommunications segment had changed and the compliance timeline was set by our regulator, not by us. The Industry-Specific Solutions changes required were significant enough to justify engaging a specialist partner rather than diverting our internal team from the product roadmap.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily Industry-Specific Solutions, with adjacent work in solution architecture and quality assurance. They were responsible for the full build from requirements through to go-live, including integration with four existing systems in our technology landscape. The breadth they covered without requiring additional vendors was commercially and logistically valuable.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
The quality of the questions they asked during the briefing process was the first indicator. Vendors who ask precise questions in the sales phase tend to apply the same rigour during delivery. That hypothesis proved accurate. The technical proposal was substantive, the team structure was senior throughout, and the pricing was transparent.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Extremely well, in part because they had relevant Telecommunications experience that reduced the context-setting overhead significantly. They understood the domain vocabulary, asked the right questions, and translated business requirements into technical specifications with a fidelity that meant the development phase had very few clarification cycles.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was proactive, timely, and appropriately calibrated. Technical updates for the engineering audience, executive summaries for the steering group, risk flags with proposed mitigations rather than just problem statements. The fortnightly sprint reviews gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every working session.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I had privately built a contingency expectation into my planning given the project complexity and the number of integrations involved. None of that contingency was needed. The delivery landed on the agreed date and the final invoice matched the approved budget to within a fraction of a percent. That outcome is rarer than the industry acknowledges.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live four months ago. User adoption exceeded the target we had set by 23 percent in the first month. Support ticket volume has dropped measurably. The features we had deferred because the previous architecture made them prohibitively expensive to build are now in development. The platform they built has opened our roadmap.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active scoping conversations for a second engagement and I expect this to develop into a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Telecommunications sector looking for Industry-Specific Solutions expertise combined with genuine delivery discipline, I would put this team at the top of the evaluation list.

FAQs

Which industries does LeewayHertz serve?
LeewayHertz has experience working with businesses across multiple industries, including Financial Services, Gaming & Gambling, Advertising & Marketing, Food & Beverage, Agriculture and Telecommunications.
Is LeewayHertz suitable for startups?
Yes. Many startups choose companies like LeewayHertz because they offer MVP development, product consulting, scalable architecture, and dedicated development teams that help launch products quickly while managing development costs. For context, its listed capabilities span IoT App Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design and Web Development, and it has been operating since 2007.
Does LeewayHertz provide post-launch support and maintenance?
Many software development companies, including LeewayHertz, offer ongoing maintenance, bug fixes, performance optimization, security updates, feature enhancements, and technical support after project deployment. For context, it has experience across industries such as Financial Services, Gaming & Gambling, Advertising & Marketing, Food & Beverage, Agriculture and Telecommunications, and its average project cost is reported at $5000000+.
How can I contact LeewayHertz for a project?
Businesses can contact LeewayHertz through its official website, email, or contact form to discuss project requirements, request a consultation, or receive a development estimate. For context, its listed capabilities span IoT App Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design and Web Development, and it has been operating since 2007.
How do I choose the right software development company?
When selecting a software development company like LeewayHertz, consider its portfolio, client reviews, industry expertise, technical capabilities, communication process, pricing model, project management approach, and post-launch support. For context, it has experience across industries such as Financial Services, Gaming & Gambling, Advertising & Marketing, Food & Beverage, Agriculture and Telecommunications, and its average project cost is reported at $5000000+.
Is LeewayHertz an offshore software development company?
LeewayHertz may operate as an offshore, onshore, or hybrid software development company depending on its location and the markets it serves. For context, it has experience across industries such as Financial Services, Gaming & Gambling, Advertising & Marketing, Food & Beverage, Agriculture and Telecommunications, and its typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149.
Can LeewayHertz build AI-powered applications?
Many modern software development companies, including LeewayHertz, offer AI and machine learning integration services such as chatbots, predictive analytics, computer vision, and intelligent automation. For context, its listed capabilities span IoT App Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design and Web Development, and its typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149.
Does LeewayHertz sign an NDA before starting a project?
Most professional software development companies, including LeewayHertz, are willing to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) to protect client data and project confidentiality before development begins. For context, its listed capabilities span IoT App Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design and Web Development, and it has been operating since 2007.
Which countries does LeewayHertz serve?
LeewayHertz may serve clients across multiple countries and regions, depending on market demand and business partnerships.

Company Info

Founded 2007
Employees 500 - 999
Hourly Rate $100 - $149
Avg. Project Cost $35,000+
Client Rating 4.6/5 (12 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.7
Cost
4.5
Communication
4.7