MTC.

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.5/5 (12 reviews)
+448448042021 info@mtcmedia.co.uk Visit Website

About MTC.

Mtc. provides a full rounded web design & development service. They provide the expertise and know-how to produce web solutions to clients over a huge range of sectors. Their people are their most valuable assets. Their dynamic and highly skilled team of people develop a synergy between creativity and technical know-how. They do not just develop beautiful sites for their portfolio but they develop sites that fulfill the requirements of their clients.

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development UI-UX Design Web Design Branding E-commerce Development Social Media Marketing SEO

Industries Served

Media & Entertainment Construction

MTC. Reviews

Write a Review

Architecture review that saved us from a vendor decision we would have regretted for years

Niamh O'Sullivan / Director of Product - Munster Digital Ltd
Verified
Feb 02, 2026

Project summary: A content deal had given us the rights to a major catalogue but our delivery infrastructure could not stream it reliably at scale. We needed a cloud-native video platform in under six months.

I came into this engagement as a sceptic. We had been through a failed implementation with a previous vendor and I had high standards for what evidence of competence looked like before I would trust a partner with our core systems. This team earned that trust progressively — through the quality of the discovery documentation, the rigour of the technical proposals, the consistency of the sprint deliveries, and ultimately the stability of the production system. I no longer lead with scepticism when recommending them.

PROS

Deep domain knowledge that reduced the discovery overhead significantly, proactive risk identification before issues became incidents, delivery cadence that our stakeholders found reassuring

CONS

Their discovery process is more rigorous than we were accustomed to and required more preparation from our side than we had initially allocated — but the quality of what followed justified every hour of it

4.5
Overall
5.0
Quality
4.0
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeIT Consulting
IndustryMedia & Entertainment
Project Cost$150,000 to $499,999
DurationJun 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Munster Digital Ltd operates in the Media & Entertainment sector with headquarters in Limerick, Ireland. In my role as Director of Product I am accountable for the full technology agenda — infrastructure, product, and vendor relationships. We are a commercially driven organisation and every technology decision is evaluated against a clear business case before it is approved.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Regulatory requirements in our Media & Entertainment segment had changed and the compliance timeline was set by our regulator, not by us. The IT Consulting changes required were significant enough to justify engaging a specialist partner rather than diverting our internal team from the product roadmap.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The core engagement was IT Consulting delivery, though their scope expanded to include technical consultancy during discovery that materially improved our requirements. They also took ownership of the third-party integration workstream that had been a coordination challenge in previous projects, removing that complexity from our internal team entirely.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thoroughly and precisely. The requirements document they produced was detailed enough that our QA team used it directly to write acceptance criteria. Every user story had a defined business objective attached. Nothing was left to interpretation. That discipline in the requirements phase paid dividends throughout development and testing.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was proactive, timely, and appropriately calibrated. Technical updates for the engineering audience, executive summaries for the steering group, risk flags with proposed mitigations rather than just problem statements. The fortnightly sprint reviews gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every working session.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I had privately built a contingency expectation into my planning given the project complexity and the number of integrations involved. None of that contingency was needed. The delivery landed on the agreed date and the final invoice matched the approved budget to within a fraction of a percent. That outcome is rarer than the industry acknowledges.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The ROI case we presented to our board was conservative by design. Current performance against the financial model suggests we will hit the projected payback point in under twelve months against an eighteen-month target. The operational efficiency gains in particular have exceeded the model, in part because the quality of the data the new platform generates supports decisions that the previous system could not.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. I would add the context that this is not the cheapest option in the market and they are selective about the engagements they take on. If your primary criterion is price, there are alternatives. If you want a technology partner who can be trusted with a complex IT Consulting programme in the Media & Entertainment space and will deliver against a serious brief, this is the team.

Full-funnel programme that turned marketing from a cost argument into a revenue conversation

Jia Hui Tan / VP of Engineering - RedDot Technologies Pte Ltd
Verified
Jan 23, 2026

Project summary: A previous engagement had delivered something that worked in staging and struggled in production. We approached this project with greater rigour in vendor selection as a result.

The integration layer was the part of the project I was most concerned about going in. Our system landscape is complex, several of the upstream APIs we relied on were poorly documented, and two third-party vendors had a history of unpredictable response times on integration questions. This team managed all of that. They documented what the upstream vendors could not, built resilience into the integration architecture where the upstream behaviour was unreliable, and delivered a solution that works as specified in production. I could not have asked for more.

PROS

Collaborative culture that made the team feel like a genuine extension of our organisation, strong asynchronous communication across time zones, zero-drama handling of the inevitable mid-project changes

CONS

The quality of documentation they produce means our team needed to set aside dedicated review time to do it justice — a minor scheduling point rather than a genuine criticism

4.5
Overall
5.0
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeDigital Marketing
IndustryConstruction
Project Cost$500,000+
DurationAug 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
RedDot Technologies Pte Ltd operates in the Construction sector with headquarters in Singapore. In my role as VP of Engineering I am accountable for the full technology agenda — infrastructure, product, and vendor relationships. We are a commercially driven organisation and every technology decision is evaluated against a clear business case before it is approved.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
A competitive threat had accelerated our roadmap. We had planned a significant Digital Marketing investment for the following year. External pressure moved that timeline forward by six months and required us to find an external partner rather than attempting to build internally in the time available.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The scope covered the full Digital Marketing lifecycle: discovery and requirements definition, solution architecture, iterative development across twelve sprints, integration testing, performance validation, production deployment, and a structured four-week hypercare period. They also provided system documentation and a knowledge transfer programme for our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thoroughly and precisely. The requirements document they produced was detailed enough that our QA team used it directly to write acceptance criteria. Every user story had a defined business objective attached. Nothing was left to interpretation. That discipline in the requirements phase paid dividends throughout development and testing.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was proactive, timely, and appropriately calibrated. Technical updates for the engineering audience, executive summaries for the steering group, risk flags with proposed mitigations rather than just problem statements. The fortnightly sprint reviews gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every working session.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on time. The budget was managed within the agreed ceiling, which included one client-driven scope addition that was quoted fairly and handled without affecting the original delivery stream. The discipline around budget transparency throughout meant there was no surprise at invoice stage.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who participated in the discovery sessions were the engineers who built the system. That consistency of institutional knowledge across a six-month project has a value that is difficult to quantify but easy to notice when it is absent. Every conversation built on the previous ones.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. I would add the context that this is not the cheapest option in the market and they are selective about the engagements they take on. If your primary criterion is price, there are alternatives. If you want a technology partner who can be trusted with a complex Digital Marketing programme in the Construction space and will deliver against a serious brief, this is the team.

FAQs

What services does MTC. offer?
MTC. provides software development services that may include mobile app development, web development, custom software development, UI/UX design, cloud solutions, AI development, and enterprise application development. Its core focus areas include Branding, E-commerce Development, Mobile App Development, SEO and Social Media Marketing.
How much does it cost to hire MTC.?
The cost of hiring MTC. depends on factors such as project complexity, development hours, required technologies, team size, and engagement model. Based on available data, MTC.'s typical hourly rate is around $150 - $199, with an average project cost of $25000+.
Is MTC. suitable for startups?
Yes. Many startups choose companies like MTC. because they offer MVP development, product consulting, scalable architecture, and dedicated development teams that help launch products quickly while managing development costs. For context, its listed capabilities span Branding, E-commerce Development, Mobile App Development, SEO and Social Media Marketing, and its average project cost is reported at $25000+.
Does MTC. provide post-launch support and maintenance?
Many software development companies, including MTC., offer ongoing maintenance, bug fixes, performance optimization, security updates, feature enhancements, and technical support after project deployment. For context, it has experience across industries such as Food & Beverage, Sports & Fitness, Environmental Services, Construction, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology and Gaming & Gambling, and it has served clients in United-kingdom.
How can I contact MTC. for a project?
Businesses can contact MTC. through its official website, email, or contact form to discuss project requirements, request a consultation, or receive a development estimate. For context, its listed capabilities span Branding, E-commerce Development, Mobile App Development, SEO and Social Media Marketing, and it has served clients in United-kingdom.
How do I choose the right software development company?
When selecting a software development company like MTC., consider its portfolio, client reviews, industry expertise, technical capabilities, communication process, pricing model, project management approach, and post-launch support. For context, it has experience across industries such as Food & Beverage, Sports & Fitness, Environmental Services, Construction, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology and Gaming & Gambling, and it reports a team size of 50 - 249 professionals.
Is MTC. an offshore software development company?
MTC. may operate as an offshore, onshore, or hybrid software development company depending on its location and the markets it serves. For context, it has served clients in United-kingdom, and it has experience across industries such as Food & Beverage, Sports & Fitness, Environmental Services, Construction, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology and Gaming & Gambling.
Can MTC. build AI-powered applications?
Many modern software development companies, including MTC., offer AI and machine learning integration services such as chatbots, predictive analytics, computer vision, and intelligent automation. For context, it has experience across industries such as Food & Beverage, Sports & Fitness, Environmental Services, Construction, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology and Gaming & Gambling, and it reports a team size of 50 - 249 professionals.
Does MTC. sign an NDA before starting a project?
Most professional software development companies, including MTC., are willing to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) to protect client data and project confidentiality before development begins. For context, it has experience across industries such as Food & Beverage, Sports & Fitness, Environmental Services, Construction, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology and Gaming & Gambling, and it reports a team size of 50 - 249 professionals.
Which countries does MTC. serve?
MTC. may serve clients across multiple countries and regions, including United-kingdom, depending on market demand and business partnerships.

Company Info

Founded 1999
Employees 50 - 249
Hourly Rate $150 - $199
Avg. Project Cost $25,000+
Client Rating 4.5/5 (12 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.4
Communication
4.5