Scrum Digital Inc

Write a Review Claim this Company
5.0/5 (2 reviews)
+916376585239 contact@scrumdigtial.com Visit Website

About Scrum Digital Inc

Scrum Digital Inc works with clients to plan, build, and ship digital products. The company's main offerings are Mobile App Development and UI/UX Design. Scrum Digital Inc employs 10 - 49 people. Typical hourly rates run around $25 - $49 / hr/hr, with an average project cost near $60,000. Clients have rated Scrum Digital Inc 4.9 out of 5 in 5 reviews. Their home base is Jaipur, India. This profile is a starting point — reach out to Scrum Digital Inc directly to discuss project specifics.

Where We Specialize

28% Chat Bots & AI Development
Chat Bots & AI Development 28%
Cloud Computing Software 20%
Virtual Reality 16%
Mobile App Development 15%
Game Development 11%
Ruby on Rails Development 8%
Content Marketing 2%

Industry Expertise

Education100%

Typical Project Size

54% Small Business
37% Enterprise
9% Midmarket Business

Scrum Digital Inc Reviews

Write a Review

Sales pipeline visibility we had wanted for years, delivered in twelve weeks

Akiko Fujimoto / Head of Product Development - Sunrise Commerce KK
Verified
Aug 29, 2024

Project summary: The project had both a hard delivery date tied to a board commitment and a scope that our previous agency had told us was not achievable. We needed someone to prove otherwise.

Project governance was one of the things that impressed me most. We had a dedicated project manager who ran tight fortnightly sprints with clear acceptance criteria, a shared backlog that gave us full visibility at all times, and a change request process that was fair and transparent. Nothing slipped through the cracks, no bill shock at the end, and the final delivery matched the original scope document almost perfectly. In my experience that kind of discipline is genuinely uncommon.

PROS

Collaborative working style that made them feel like an extension of our team, excellent written communication for our async timezone relationship, clean and readable codebase

CONS

Their calendar books up quickly which made scheduling the initial kickoff slightly challenging — a good problem for them to have and not one that affected our delivery

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeCRM Development
IndustryHuman Resources
Project Cost$50,000 to $149,999
DurationFeb 2025 – Mar 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Sunrise Commerce KK, a mid-sized organisation in the Human Resources sector headquartered in Osaka, Japan. My remit as Head of Product Development covers everything from infrastructure to product development. We had reached a point where our internal engineering capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap without an experienced external partner.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate trigger was a performance failure during our peak trading period that cost us measurably in both revenue and client trust. The root cause was architectural and our internal team did not have the CRM Development expertise to address it properly. We needed specialists.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The core engagement was CRM Development but expanded to include technical consultancy during the discovery phase, which helped us refine the requirements significantly before development began. They also took responsibility for coordinating with our third-party data providers, which removed a significant coordination burden from our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
Honestly, the quality of the questions they asked during the briefing process set them apart. Most vendors listen to the brief and come back with a solution to exactly what you described. This team came back with a solution to what we actually needed, which turned out to be somewhat different. That kind of consultative instinct is what we were looking for.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Extremely well. They asked detailed questions, challenged vague requirements until they were specific, and proposed sensible defaults for decisions we had not yet made rather than just leaving them open. By the time development started there was no ambiguity in the backlog, which is a rare starting position.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. We used a shared project management tool that gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every meeting. The project manager had a clear escalation path and used it appropriately. The only time I needed to intervene directly was when I chose to, not because something had been missed.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the agreed budget. They had given us a range estimate at the start, which I had been sceptical of, and they landed within the lower half of that range. Their estimation accuracy came from having broken the work down in genuine detail during discovery rather than giving a rough number and hoping. It showed in every sprint.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The ROI case we presented to our board assumed a payback period of eighteen months. Based on current trajectory we will hit that in under a year. The efficiency gains in our Human Resources operations have been more significant than the model projected, partly because the quality of the data coming out of the new system is enabling decisions we could not make before.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who scoped the work were the engineers who built it. That sounds like it should be standard practice but in my experience it often is not. The institutional knowledge that comes from that continuity pays dividends at every stage, particularly when you are dealing with a complex Human Resources domain where context takes time to build.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. The referral I would give comes with context: they are not the cheapest option and they are not the fastest to schedule. If you are optimising purely on price or looking for someone to start tomorrow, there are other choices. If you want the work done properly and a partner you can trust with a complex, high-stakes CRM Development engagement, this team is the answer.

Infrastructure-as-code that our DevOps team can actually read and maintain

Oliver Harrington / Chief Technology Officer - Meridian Consulting Ltd
Verified
Feb 07, 2023

Project summary: Production downtime was costing us significantly each quarter and our existing monitoring infrastructure had no predictive capability whatsoever.

Our previous agency had given us a platform that worked well enough to demo and fell apart under real load. This team came in, diagnosed the root causes accurately, and rebuilt the critical components without disrupting the live service. The performance improvements were immediate and measurable — page load times dropped by 60 percent, error rates dropped to near zero, and our support team has far fewer incidents to deal with. The contrast with our previous experience could not have been sharper.

PROS

Engineering quality that our internal team can maintain without calling the vendor, thorough documentation, proactive risk identification throughout the project

CONS

Honestly nothing worth documenting — we went in with high expectations and they were met on every measure

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeCloud Services
IndustryManufacturing
Project Cost$150,000 to $499,999
DurationJan 2025 – Jan 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Meridian Consulting Ltd, a mid-sized organisation in the Manufacturing sector headquartered in London, UK. My remit as Chief Technology Officer covers everything from infrastructure to product development. We had reached a point where our internal engineering capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap without an experienced external partner.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate trigger was a performance failure during our peak trading period that cost us measurably in both revenue and client trust. The root cause was architectural and our internal team did not have the Cloud Services expertise to address it properly. We needed specialists.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end Cloud Services delivery with a particular emphasis on the integration layer that connected the new build to our existing Manufacturing infrastructure. They also provided UI/UX input that was not in the original scope but which they offered proactively because they could see it would affect adoption. That kind of initiative was characteristic of how they approached the whole engagement.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
Their portfolio included two projects that were sufficiently close to our own brief in terms of complexity, Cloud Services scope, and Manufacturing context that we felt confident they understood what we were asking. The proposal was technically rigorous, the pricing was transparent, and the proposed team structure gave us senior engineers throughout rather than just for the pitch.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thorough and precise. They translated our business language into technical requirements without losing the intent, which is a skill that sounds straightforward but frequently goes wrong. Every user story they wrote was reviewed against the original business objective before it entered the sprint and the acceptance criteria were specific enough to remove subjectivity from QA.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. I have worked with agencies that communicate beautifully during the sales process and go quiet during delivery. This was the opposite — structured, consistent, and genuinely informative throughout. Problems were surfaced early with proposed solutions rather than just problem statements, which made the inevitable mid-project decisions much easier to make.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes on both counts. There was one sprint where a third-party integration took longer than scoped because of undocumented API behaviour on the vendor side. The team flagged it immediately, proposed two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the timeline within two weeks. That is how scope issues should be handled and rarely are.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live three months ago. In that time we have not had a single P1 incident, our page performance scores have improved across every measure, and the feature we had deprioritised for years because the old architecture made it too complex to implement is now in our next sprint. The platform they built has opened up our roadmap in a way we had not anticipated.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some agencies disappear the moment the final invoice is paid. This team maintained the same level of responsiveness during the hypercare period as during development, handed over thorough documentation without being asked twice, and checked in proactively a month after go-live to review performance metrics with us. That last part was entirely unprompted.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
I recommend them to anyone who asks and occasionally to people who do not. The combination of Cloud Services expertise, Manufacturing domain knowledge, and delivery discipline is genuinely difficult to find. We found it here and we intend to keep it.

FAQs

What technologies does Scrum Digital specialize in?
Depending on the project requirements, Scrum Digital may work with technologies such as React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, iOS, Android, AWS, Azure, AI, and cloud platforms. For context, its listed capabilities span Digital Marketing, IoT App Development, Mobile App Development, Web Design and Web Development, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
Why should businesses choose Scrum Digital?
Businesses may choose Scrum Digital based on factors such as technical expertise, industry experience, client reviews, development methodology, communication practices, and the ability to deliver scalable software solutions that align with business objectives. Founded in 2019, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
Does Scrum Digital provide post-launch support and maintenance?
Many software development companies, including Scrum Digital, offer ongoing maintenance, bug fixes, performance optimization, security updates, feature enhancements, and technical support after project deployment. For context, it has served clients in USA, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
How can I contact Scrum Digital for a project?
Businesses can contact Scrum Digital through its official website, email, or contact form to discuss project requirements, request a consultation, or receive a development estimate. For context, it has experience across industries such as Manufacturing and Human Resources, and it has served clients in USA.
How do I choose the right software development company?
When selecting a software development company like Scrum Digital, consider its portfolio, client reviews, industry expertise, technical capabilities, communication process, pricing model, project management approach, and post-launch support. For context, its listed capabilities span Digital Marketing, IoT App Development, Mobile App Development, Web Design and Web Development, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
Is Scrum Digital an offshore software development company?
Scrum Digital may operate as an offshore, onshore, or hybrid software development company depending on its location and the markets it serves. For context, it has served clients in USA, and its average project cost is reported at $10000+.
Does Scrum Digital offer dedicated developers?
Yes, many companies like Scrum Digital provide a dedicated developer hiring model, allowing businesses to scale their in-house team with experienced professionals who work exclusively on their project. For context, it has served clients in USA, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
What engagement models does Scrum Digital provide?
Scrum Digital may offer multiple engagement models such as fixed-price contracts, dedicated team hiring, and time-and-material billing, allowing businesses to choose the option that best fits their budget and project scope. For context, its listed capabilities span Digital Marketing, IoT App Development, Mobile App Development, Web Design and Web Development, and it has served clients in USA.
Does Scrum Digital develop SaaS products?
Yes, Scrum Digital may offer SaaS product development services, including multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing integration, and cloud-native deployment for scalable software-as-a-service solutions. For context, it has experience across industries such as Manufacturing and Human Resources, and its average project cost is reported at $10000+.
How do I request a proposal from Scrum Digital?
You can request a proposal from Scrum Digital by submitting your project requirements through its website contact form, email, or by reaching out directly to discuss your business goals and receive a tailored development estimate. For context, it has served clients in USA, and its average project cost is reported at $10000+.

Company Info

Founded 2019
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate $25 - $49 / hr
Avg. Project Cost $60,000+
Client Rating 5.0/5 (2 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
5.0