Serfe

Write a Review Claim this Company
5.0/5 (2 reviews)
+5420342204748205 serfe_logo_text-blue@2x.webp Visit Website

About Serfe

Serfe is a software development company that turns ideas into working products. Serfe has experience working with clients in Retail & E-commerce. The company operates with a team of 50 - 249 professionals. Clients can expect pricing around $25 - $49 / hr/hr, with projects averaging about $55,000. Clients have rated Serfe 4.9 out of 5 in 20 reviews. The team is based in Santo Tomé, Argentina. This gives a quick snapshot of what to expect when working with Serfe.

Where We Specialize

29% Web Development
Web Development 29%
Virtual Reality 28%
AI Development 24%
Mobile App Development 19%

Industry Expertise

Retail100%

Typical Project Size

48% Enterprise
38% Midmarket Business
14% Small Business

Serfe Reviews

Write a Review

Visual identity and UX that our NPS scores immediately reflected

Antoine Lefevre / Directeur Technique - Lumiere Digital SAS
Verified
Mar 09, 2026

Project summary: Our competitors had been investing in technology for two years and we needed to close a meaningful gap quickly without compromising on the quality of what we shipped.

The engagement started with a discovery workshop that immediately signalled this team was different. They pushed back on two of our assumptions in the first session with evidence and a better alternative. That kind of intellectual honesty is rare and it set the tone for the whole project. Deliverables were consistently ahead of schedule, code reviews were taken seriously, and the final product is something we are proud to show enterprise clients during due diligence calls.

PROS

Architectural decisions that will serve us for years rather than just solving the immediate problem, knowledge transfer that left our team genuinely capable, no scope creep at all

CONS

Time zone difference required some adjustment to our internal communication habits but the team managed the overlap window efficiently and it never affected momentum

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeUI/UX Design
IndustryFashion & Apparel
Project Cost$50,000 to $149,999
DurationMar 2025 – Sep 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Lumiere Digital SAS is a Fashion & Apparel business based in Paris, France. As Directeur Technique I am responsible for all technology investment decisions, vendor selection, and ensuring our digital capabilities match our growth ambitions. We operate in a competitive market where the quality of our software directly affects our ability to win and retain clients.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our Fashion & Apparel regulatory environment had changed and the compliance timeline was non-negotiable. We needed to rebuild specific components of our system to meet the new requirements and our internal team was already fully committed to the core product roadmap. Bringing in a specialist UI/UX Design partner was the only realistic path.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The full UI/UX Design lifecycle from discovery through to production deployment and hypercare support. This included requirements workshops, solution architecture, sprint-based development, QA and automated testing, deployment to our cloud environment, and a structured handover with documentation. They also provided a brief post-launch period of dedicated support which was genuinely useful.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
A direct referral from a peer who had used them for a comparable UI/UX Design engagement in the Fashion & Apparel space. That peer's experience had been excellent and their project profile was similar enough to ours that the recommendation carried real weight. Everything we found during our own evaluation reinforced that this was the right decision.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
The requirements understanding was solid from early on, aided by the fact that they had prior experience in the Fashion & Apparel sector and did not need us to explain domain context that a less experienced team would have required. That background knowledge shortened the discovery phase meaningfully and reduced the volume of clarification questions during sprints.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. I have worked with agencies that communicate beautifully during the sales process and go quiet during delivery. This was the opposite — structured, consistent, and genuinely informative throughout. Problems were surfaced early with proposed solutions rather than just problem statements, which made the inevitable mid-project decisions much easier to make.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I will note that the original timeline was aggressive and I had privately expected a slip. They managed to hold it by making smart sequencing decisions early on that I only fully understood in retrospect. The budget discipline was equally good — we received a single change request for scope we had introduced ourselves and it was priced fairly.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live three months ago. In that time we have not had a single P1 incident, our page performance scores have improved across every measure, and the feature we had deprioritised for years because the old architecture made it too complex to implement is now in our next sprint. The platform they built has opened up our roadmap in a way we had not anticipated.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The quality of the written communication. This matters more than most clients articulate. Clear, concise, technically accurate updates that our non-technical stakeholders could read and understand. Proposals and change requests that made the decision obvious rather than obscuring it in jargon. That communication quality reduced our internal coordination overhead significantly.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. The referral I would give comes with context: they are not the cheapest option and they are not the fastest to schedule. If you are optimising purely on price or looking for someone to start tomorrow, there are other choices. If you want the work done properly and a partner you can trust with a complex, high-stakes UI/UX Design engagement, this team is the answer.

CMS migration completed without losing a single page of SEO equity

Divya Nair / Director of Technology - BrightPath EdTech
Verified
Jun 11, 2025

Project summary: Post-pandemic recovery meant rebuilding our booking infrastructure from scratch with a focus on flexibility, cancellation handling, and real-time inventory across multiple GDS providers.

The technical quality of the work is the easiest thing to praise, but what I want to highlight is the communication culture on this team. Every question got a same-day response. Every risk got flagged before it became an issue. When we needed to change direction mid-project — a business decision on our side — they absorbed the change professionally, requoted fairly, and kept momentum going. That flexibility is something you cannot assess in a proposal and it turned out to be one of the most valuable things about working with them.

PROS

Business-aware approach to every technical decision, strong project governance, fast turnaround on feedback, zero drama during a genuinely complex engagement

CONS

We underestimated the internal resource commitment required on our side during discovery — the team warned us, we did not listen fully, and the first sprint was slower as a result

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeCMS Development
IndustryTravel & Hospitality
Project Cost$500,000+
DurationFeb 2025 – Apr 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
BrightPath EdTech operates across the Travel & Hospitality sector with offices in Pune, India. In my capacity as Director of Technology I oversee both the strategic and operational technology agenda. We are a growth-stage business that needed a development partner capable of scaling with us rather than constraining us.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our Travel & Hospitality regulatory environment had changed and the compliance timeline was non-negotiable. We needed to rebuild specific components of our system to meet the new requirements and our internal team was already fully committed to the core product roadmap. Bringing in a specialist CMS Development partner was the only realistic path.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end CMS Development delivery with a particular emphasis on the integration layer that connected the new build to our existing Travel & Hospitality infrastructure. They also provided UI/UX input that was not in the original scope but which they offered proactively because they could see it would affect adoption. That kind of initiative was characteristic of how they approached the whole engagement.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
A direct referral from a peer who had used them for a comparable CMS Development engagement in the Travel & Hospitality space. That peer's experience had been excellent and their project profile was similar enough to ours that the recommendation carried real weight. Everything we found during our own evaluation reinforced that this was the right decision.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thorough and precise. They translated our business language into technical requirements without losing the intent, which is a skill that sounds straightforward but frequently goes wrong. Every user story they wrote was reviewed against the original business objective before it entered the sprint and the acceptance criteria were specific enough to remove subjectivity from QA.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management was the best I have experienced in a vendor relationship. We had fortnightly sprint reviews with structured agendas, a shared backlog that we could inspect at any point, a risk register that was actively maintained rather than created at kickoff and never opened again, and a project manager who treated our time as something worth protecting. Communication was proactive, not reactive.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes on both counts. There was one sprint where a third-party integration took longer than scoped because of undocumented API behaviour on the vendor side. The team flagged it immediately, proposed two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the timeline within two weeks. That is how scope issues should be handled and rarely are.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The ROI case we presented to our board assumed a payback period of eighteen months. Based on current trajectory we will hit that in under a year. The efficiency gains in our Travel & Hospitality operations have been more significant than the model projected, partly because the quality of the data coming out of the new system is enabling decisions we could not make before.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The intellectual honesty. They told us when something we wanted was a bad idea and explained why. They told us when a timeline was tight and gave us options. They did not tell us what we wanted to hear in order to win work or avoid a difficult conversation. In a long engagement that kind of relationship is far more valuable than an agency that just says yes.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. I would recommend them with a specific note that the quality of the discovery process is where the value starts. Clients who invest properly in that phase will get the most out of the engagement. We made that investment and the returns are evident in the quality of what was delivered.

FAQs

What services does Serfe offer?
Serfe provides software development services that may include mobile app development, web development, custom software development, UI/UX design, cloud solutions, AI development, and enterprise application development. Its core focus areas include Crypto Exchange Development, iPhone App Development, Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development and Supply Chain Blockchain.
How can I contact Serfe for a project?
Businesses can contact Serfe through its official website, email, or contact form to discuss project requirements, request a consultation, or receive a development estimate. For context, its listed capabilities span Crypto Exchange Development, iPhone App Development, Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development and Supply Chain Blockchain, and it has experience across industries such as Travel & Hospitality and Fashion & Apparel.
Is Serfe an offshore software development company?
Serfe may operate as an offshore, onshore, or hybrid software development company depending on its location and the markets it serves. For context, it has experience across industries such as Travel & Hospitality and Fashion & Apparel, and its average project cost is reported at $2500000+.
Does Serfe offer dedicated developers?
Yes, many companies like Serfe provide a dedicated developer hiring model, allowing businesses to scale their in-house team with experienced professionals who work exclusively on their project. For context, its listed capabilities span Crypto Exchange Development, iPhone App Development, Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development and Supply Chain Blockchain, and its typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49.
What engagement models does Serfe provide?
Serfe may offer multiple engagement models such as fixed-price contracts, dedicated team hiring, and time-and-material billing, allowing businesses to choose the option that best fits their budget and project scope. For context, it has experience across industries such as Travel & Hospitality and Fashion & Apparel, and its listed capabilities span Crypto Exchange Development, iPhone App Development, Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development and Supply Chain Blockchain.
Can Serfe build AI-powered applications?
Many modern software development companies, including Serfe, offer AI and machine learning integration services such as chatbots, predictive analytics, computer vision, and intelligent automation. For context, its listed capabilities span Crypto Exchange Development, iPhone App Development, Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development and Supply Chain Blockchain, and it has been operating since 2003.
Does Serfe sign an NDA before starting a project?
Most professional software development companies, including Serfe, are willing to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) to protect client data and project confidentiality before development begins. For context, it has experience across industries such as Travel & Hospitality and Fashion & Apparel, and it has been operating since 2003.
Which countries does Serfe serve?
Serfe may serve clients across multiple countries and regions, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
What is Serfe's software development process?
Serfe typically follows a structured software development process that may include requirement analysis, UI/UX design, agile development sprints, quality assurance testing, deployment, and post-launch support. For context, its listed capabilities span Crypto Exchange Development, iPhone App Development, Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development and Supply Chain Blockchain, and its typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49.

Company Info

Founded 2003
Employees 50 - 249
Hourly Rate $25 - $49 / hr
Avg. Project Cost $55,000+
Client Rating 5.0/5 (2 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
5.0