Synebo

Write a Review Claim this Company
5.0/5 (2 reviews)
+15163081766 contact@synebo.io Visit Website

About Synebo

Synebo has grown steadily since its founding in 2015, expanding to a team of 50 to 249 employees and building one of the more extensive service portfolios in its peer group. The company offers mobile app development, cross platform app development, web development, enterprise app modernization, IoT app development, Unity 3D game development, and AR app development, a list that touches nearly every major category of modern application work. This breadth suggests Synebo has organized itself into specialized teams capable of handling very different technical challenges, from web-based projects to connected hardware and immersive gaming experiences. Its enterprise app modernization capability further indicates the firm supports established organizations seeking to upgrade legacy systems, not just startups building new products. With accessible hourly rates relative to the scope of its offerings, Synebo positions itself as a versatile, cost-conscious option for businesses that would otherwise need to coordinate multiple specialized vendors. For organizations seeking a single partner capable of covering web, mobile, IoT, and immersive technology needs under one roof, Synebo's wide-ranging capabilities and decade of operating experience make it a compelling option.

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development AR App Development Unity 3D Game Development IoT App Development Enterprise App Modernization Cross Platform App Development

Industries Served

Insurance Financial Services

Synebo Reviews

Write a Review

Execution that matched the sales pitch — which is rarer than it should be

Ciarán Murphy / CTO - Liffey Tech Solutions Ltd
Verified
May 05, 2026

Project summary: Claims fraud detection had been rule-based for years and we were losing ground to more sophisticated patterns — we needed a machine learning model built on our own historical data.

Our previous agency had given us a platform that worked well enough to demo and fell apart under real load. This team came in, diagnosed the root causes accurately, and rebuilt the critical components without disrupting the live service. The performance improvements were immediate and measurable — page load times dropped by 60 percent, error rates dropped to near zero, and our support team has far fewer incidents to deal with. The contrast with our previous experience could not have been sharper.

PROS

Technical depth across the full stack, honest and timely communication, delivered exactly what was scoped without surprise additions to the invoice

CONS

Premium pricing compared to some of the alternatives we evaluated, but the quality of the output and the absence of rework costs made the investment straightforward to justify

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypePOS System Development
IndustryInsurance
Project Cost$500,000+
DurationSep 2025 – May 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Liffey Tech Solutions Ltd is a Insurance business based in Dublin, Ireland. As CTO I am responsible for all technology investment decisions, vendor selection, and ensuring our digital capabilities match our growth ambitions. We operate in a competitive market where the quality of our software directly affects our ability to win and retain clients.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
We had a product concept validated by market research but no clear path to build it within our budget and timeline constraints. Our Insurance competitors were moving quickly and we could not afford to spend eighteen months finding out a generalist agency could not execute the POS System Development work our product required.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The core engagement was POS System Development but expanded to include technical consultancy during the discovery phase, which helped us refine the requirements significantly before development began. They also took responsibility for coordinating with our third-party data providers, which removed a significant coordination burden from our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We evaluated four vendors in total. Two were eliminated after the technical assessment stage because their proposed architectures showed a surface-level understanding of what we needed. This team's proposal demonstrated genuine depth in POS System Development and specific knowledge of the Insurance sector that the others could not match. The reference calls confirmed a consistent pattern of delivery.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
The requirements understanding was solid from early on, aided by the fact that they had prior experience in the Insurance sector and did not need us to explain domain context that a less experienced team would have required. That background knowledge shortened the discovery phase meaningfully and reduced the volume of clarification questions during sprints.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management was the best I have experienced in a vendor relationship. We had fortnightly sprint reviews with structured agendas, a shared backlog that we could inspect at any point, a risk register that was actively maintained rather than created at kickoff and never opened again, and a project manager who treated our time as something worth protecting. Communication was proactive, not reactive.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the agreed budget. They had given us a range estimate at the start, which I had been sceptical of, and they landed within the lower half of that range. Their estimation accuracy came from having broken the work down in genuine detail during discovery rather than giving a rough number and hoping. It showed in every sprint.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is that the problem we hired them to solve no longer exists. Beyond that, the new POS System Development platform has reduced our operational overhead measurably, our team spends less time managing incidents and more time on product development, and we have been able to onboard two new enterprise clients who had previously cited our technical limitations as a barrier.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their ability to hold the business objective in mind alongside the technical task. I have worked with technically excellent agencies who lost the thread of what we were actually trying to achieve. This team never did. Every architectural decision, every trade-off conversation, every prioritisation discussion was anchored to the outcome we had agreed at the start.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without qualification. I have already made two direct referrals to peers in the Insurance sector who were facing similar POS System Development challenges. In both cases I gave the recommendation specifically because I was confident the experience would match what I described — which is a level of confidence I do not extend lightly.

A development partner who genuinely understood our business, not just the code

Faisal Al-Ghamdi / Chief Digital Officer - Riyadh Tech Ventures
Verified
Feb 20, 2024

Project summary: Regulatory changes required us to rebuild our client reporting module from the ground up with full audit trail, real-time data, and a compliant data residency model.

The engagement started with a discovery workshop that immediately signalled this team was different. They pushed back on two of our assumptions in the first session with evidence and a better alternative. That kind of intellectual honesty is rare and it set the tone for the whole project. Deliverables were consistently ahead of schedule, code reviews were taken seriously, and the final product is something we are proud to show enterprise clients during due diligence calls.

PROS

Technical depth across the full stack, honest and timely communication, delivered exactly what was scoped without surprise additions to the invoice

CONS

Their calendar books up quickly which made scheduling the initial kickoff slightly challenging — a good problem for them to have and not one that affected our delivery

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeSoftware Development
IndustryFinancial Services
Project Cost$10,000 to $49,999
DurationMar 2025 – Jul 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As Chief Digital Officer at Riyadh Tech Ventures, I manage a cross-functional technology team serving our Financial Services clients from Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. We are a commercially focused organisation and every technology decision we make is evaluated against a clear business case. We needed a partner who understood that context, not just the technical brief.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
We had a product concept validated by market research but no clear path to build it within our budget and timeline constraints. Our Financial Services competitors were moving quickly and we could not afford to spend eighteen months finding out a generalist agency could not execute the Software Development work our product required.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The core engagement was Software Development but expanded to include technical consultancy during the discovery phase, which helped us refine the requirements significantly before development began. They also took responsibility for coordinating with our third-party data providers, which removed a significant coordination burden from our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
Their portfolio included two projects that were sufficiently close to our own brief in terms of complexity, Software Development scope, and Financial Services context that we felt confident they understood what we were asking. The proposal was technically rigorous, the pricing was transparent, and the proposed team structure gave us senior engineers throughout rather than just for the pitch.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
The requirements understanding was solid from early on, aided by the fact that they had prior experience in the Financial Services sector and did not need us to explain domain context that a less experienced team would have required. That background knowledge shortened the discovery phase meaningfully and reduced the volume of clarification questions during sprints.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. I have worked with agencies that communicate beautifully during the sales process and go quiet during delivery. This was the opposite — structured, consistent, and genuinely informative throughout. Problems were surfaced early with proposed solutions rather than just problem statements, which made the inevitable mid-project decisions much easier to make.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on the agreed delivery date and within the approved budget. We did add scope during the engagement — two features that became apparent as essential during user testing — and those were quoted, approved, and delivered without affecting the original scope timeline. That kind of clean change management is not something you can take for granted.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The ROI case we presented to our board assumed a payback period of eighteen months. Based on current trajectory we will hit that in under a year. The efficiency gains in our Financial Services operations have been more significant than the model projected, partly because the quality of the data coming out of the new system is enabling decisions we could not make before.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their ability to hold the business objective in mind alongside the technical task. I have worked with technically excellent agencies who lost the thread of what we were actually trying to achieve. This team never did. Every architectural decision, every trade-off conversation, every prioritisation discussion was anchored to the outcome we had agreed at the start.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. I would recommend them with a specific note that the quality of the discovery process is where the value starts. Clients who invest properly in that phase will get the most out of the engagement. We made that investment and the returns are evident in the quality of what was delivered.

FAQs

Which industries does Synebo serve?
Synebo has experience working with businesses across multiple industries, including Financial Services and Insurance.
Is Synebo suitable for startups?
Yes. Many startups choose companies like Synebo because they offer MVP development, product consulting, scalable architecture, and dedicated development teams that help launch products quickly while managing development costs. For context, it has experience across industries such as Financial Services and Insurance, and it has been operating since 2015.
Does Synebo provide post-launch support and maintenance?
Many software development companies, including Synebo, offer ongoing maintenance, bug fixes, performance optimization, security updates, feature enhancements, and technical support after project deployment. For context, its listed capabilities span Mobile App Development, Cross Platform App Development, Web Development, Enterprise App Modernization and IoT App Development, and its average project cost is reported at $5000000+.
How do I choose the right software development company?
When selecting a software development company like Synebo, consider its portfolio, client reviews, industry expertise, technical capabilities, communication process, pricing model, project management approach, and post-launch support. For context, its listed capabilities span Mobile App Development, Cross Platform App Development, Web Development, Enterprise App Modernization and IoT App Development, and it has been operating since 2015.
Does Synebo offer dedicated developers?
Yes, many companies like Synebo provide a dedicated developer hiring model, allowing businesses to scale their in-house team with experienced professionals who work exclusively on their project. For context, it has experience across industries such as Financial Services and Insurance, and its average project cost is reported at $5000000+.
Does Synebo sign an NDA before starting a project?
Most professional software development companies, including Synebo, are willing to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) to protect client data and project confidentiality before development begins. For context, it has experience across industries such as Financial Services and Insurance, and its average project cost is reported at $5000000+.
Which countries does Synebo serve?
Synebo may serve clients across multiple countries and regions, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
Can Synebo modernize legacy software?
Synebo may provide legacy software modernization services, including re-platforming, code refactoring, and migration to modern frameworks or cloud infrastructure to improve performance and maintainability. For context, it has experience across industries such as Financial Services and Insurance, and its typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49.
What is Synebo's software development process?
Synebo typically follows a structured software development process that may include requirement analysis, UI/UX design, agile development sprints, quality assurance testing, deployment, and post-launch support. For context, it has experience across industries such as Financial Services and Insurance, and it has been operating since 2015.

Company Info

Founded 2015
Employees 50 - 249
Hourly Rate $25 - $49
Avg. Project Cost $5,000,000+
Client Rating 5.0/5 (2 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
5.0