Synechron

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.4/5 (12 reviews)
+12126195200 gmc@synechron.com Visit Website

About Synechron

It is one of the fastest-growing digital, business consulting & technology service company. They have been developing the Cryptocurrency Exchange Software for various business since the introduction of the digital currency- Bitcoin. They combine excellent technology, product-oriented approach, simple business model and creative people.

Services

Custom Software Development AI Development Digital Strategy Cloud Solutions Blockchain Development

Industries Served

Logistics & Supply Chain Government & Public Sector

Synechron Reviews

Write a Review

Mixed reality build that landed exactly where the brief pointed and then went further

Nathan Prescott / VP of Technology - Ironclad Insurance Group
Verified
Jan 29, 2026

Project summary: Warehouse management inefficiencies were adding cost and introducing errors at a rate that was becoming visible to clients. A modernised WMS was the agreed solution internally — we needed a partner to build it.

What made the most difference in practice was the quality of the engineering judgment on this team. Not the ability to execute a specification — that is a baseline expectation. The ability to recognise when a specification was suboptimal, explain why, propose an alternative, and support the client in making a decision about it. That consultative dimension elevated the output beyond what the brief described and resulted in a product that is more fit for purpose than the one we had originally specified.

PROS

Commercially transparent throughout — no hidden assumptions, no bill shock at the end, change requests that were fair and clearly explained rather than used as a margin-recovery mechanism

CONS

Their discovery process is more rigorous than we were accustomed to and required more preparation from our side than we had initially allocated — but the quality of what followed justified every hour of it

4.5
Overall
5.0
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.0
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeAR/VR Development
IndustryLogistics & Supply Chain
Project Cost$150,000 to $499,999
DurationMar 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Ironclad Insurance Group, a growth-stage Logistics & Supply Chain business based in New York, USA. As VP of Technology my remit spans product engineering, platform operations, and strategic vendor partnerships. We had reached an inflection point where our internal capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap at the pace our market required.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
We had a defined product vision for our next phase of growth in the Logistics & Supply Chain market but lacked the engineering depth internally to execute it. The AR/VR Development requirements in particular required specialist experience that we could not realistically recruit for on the timeline our business plan required.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily AR/VR Development, with adjacent work in solution architecture and quality assurance. They were responsible for the full build from requirements through to go-live, including integration with four existing systems in our technology landscape. The breadth they covered without requiring additional vendors was commercially and logistically valuable.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. The discipline around asynchronous communication was particularly effective given the time zones involved between New York, USA and the delivery team. Written updates were specific and consistent, response times were same-day for anything that required a decision, and nothing fell through the cracks across a six-month engagement.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes to both. There was a single sprint where a dependency on a third-party API introduced a one-week delay. The team identified it three weeks in advance, presented two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the schedule within the same sprint cycle. That level of foresight is what separates good project management from reactive problem management.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. I would add the context that this is not the cheapest option in the market and they are selective about the engagements they take on. If your primary criterion is price, there are alternatives. If you want a technology partner who can be trusted with a complex AR/VR Development programme in the Logistics & Supply Chain space and will deliver against a serious brief, this is the team.

CI/CD pipeline that transformed how our engineering team thinks about release risk

Priya Chandrasekaran / VP of Data & AI - Wavefront Analytics Inc
Verified
Jan 23, 2026

Project summary: Digital service standards required all citizen-facing applications to meet accessibility and performance benchmarks that our inherited systems failed. Remediation was not viable — we needed a replacement.

What made the most difference in practice was the quality of the engineering judgment on this team. Not the ability to execute a specification — that is a baseline expectation. The ability to recognise when a specification was suboptimal, explain why, propose an alternative, and support the client in making a decision about it. That consultative dimension elevated the output beyond what the brief described and resulted in a product that is more fit for purpose than the one we had originally specified.

PROS

Clear and consistent communication adapted appropriately for both technical and non-technical stakeholders, shared tooling that gave our team real-time visibility, reliable sprint delivery throughout

CONS

Their insistence on a detailed functional specification before development began felt like friction at the time. In retrospect, it was the reason the development phase ran without the ambiguity that has derailed similar projects for us previously

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.5
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeDevOps Services
IndustryGovernment & Public Sector
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationMar 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Wavefront Analytics Inc is an established Government & Public Sector organisation headquartered in Seattle, USA. My role as VP of Data & AI covers both strategic planning and operational technology delivery. We maintain high standards for our vendors because our clients hold us to high standards — a bar we expect our partners to meet.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
A competitive threat had accelerated our roadmap. We had planned a significant DevOps Services investment for the following year. External pressure moved that timeline forward by six months and required us to find an external partner rather than attempting to build internally in the time available.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily DevOps Services, with adjacent work in solution architecture and quality assurance. They were responsible for the full build from requirements through to go-live, including integration with four existing systems in our technology landscape. The breadth they covered without requiring additional vendors was commercially and logistically valuable.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
The quality of the questions they asked during the briefing process was the first indicator. Vendors who ask precise questions in the sales phase tend to apply the same rigour during delivery. That hypothesis proved accurate. The technical proposal was substantive, the team structure was senior throughout, and the pricing was transparent.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Extremely well, in part because they had relevant Government & Public Sector experience that reduced the context-setting overhead significantly. They understood the domain vocabulary, asked the right questions, and translated business requirements into technical specifications with a fidelity that meant the development phase had very few clarification cycles.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. The discipline around asynchronous communication was particularly effective given the time zones involved between Seattle, USA and the delivery team. Written updates were specific and consistent, response times were same-day for anything that required a decision, and nothing fell through the cracks across a six-month engagement.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I had privately built a contingency expectation into my planning given the project complexity and the number of integrations involved. None of that contingency was needed. The delivery landed on the agreed date and the final invoice matched the approved budget to within a fraction of a percent. That outcome is rarer than the industry acknowledges.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantifying the impact precisely is complicated by other variables in our business, but the metrics we can attribute directly to the DevOps Services work are meaningful: session duration up, conversion rate up, error rate down, and our NPS for the digital touchpoint has improved by eleven points. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active scoping conversations for a second engagement and I expect this to develop into a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Government & Public Sector sector looking for DevOps Services expertise combined with genuine delivery discipline, I would put this team at the top of the evaluation list.

FAQs

How much does it cost to hire Synechron?
The cost of hiring Synechron depends on factors such as project complexity, development hours, required technologies, team size, and engagement model. Based on available data, Synechron's typical hourly rate is around $50 - $99, with an average project cost of $10000+.
Which industries does Synechron serve?
Synechron has experience working with businesses across multiple industries, including Real Estate, Logistics & Supply Chain, Construction, Information Technology, Education and Automotive.
What technologies does Synechron specialize in?
Depending on the project requirements, Synechron may work with technologies such as React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, iOS, Android, AWS, Azure, AI, and cloud platforms. For context, it has served clients in USA, and its listed capabilities span AI Development, Blockchain Development, Cloud Solutions, Custom Software Development and Digital Strategy.
Does Synechron provide post-launch support and maintenance?
Many software development companies, including Synechron, offer ongoing maintenance, bug fixes, performance optimization, security updates, feature enhancements, and technical support after project deployment. For context, its listed capabilities span AI Development, Blockchain Development, Cloud Solutions, Custom Software Development and Digital Strategy, and it has served clients in USA.
How can I contact Synechron for a project?
Businesses can contact Synechron through its official website, email, or contact form to discuss project requirements, request a consultation, or receive a development estimate. For context, it has served clients in USA, and it reports a team size of 1000+ professionals.
How do I choose the right software development company?
When selecting a software development company like Synechron, consider its portfolio, client reviews, industry expertise, technical capabilities, communication process, pricing model, project management approach, and post-launch support. For context, its listed capabilities span AI Development, Blockchain Development, Cloud Solutions, Custom Software Development and Digital Strategy, and its average project cost is reported at $10000+.
Does Synechron offer dedicated developers?
Yes, many companies like Synechron provide a dedicated developer hiring model, allowing businesses to scale their in-house team with experienced professionals who work exclusively on their project. For context, it has served clients in USA, and its average project cost is reported at $10000+.
Does Synechron sign an NDA before starting a project?
Most professional software development companies, including Synechron, are willing to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) to protect client data and project confidentiality before development begins. For context, its listed capabilities span AI Development, Blockchain Development, Cloud Solutions, Custom Software Development and Digital Strategy, and it has been operating since 2001.
Which countries does Synechron serve?
Synechron may serve clients across multiple countries and regions, including USA, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
How do I request a proposal from Synechron?
You can request a proposal from Synechron by submitting your project requirements through its website contact form, email, or by reaching out directly to discuss your business goals and receive a tailored development estimate. For context, it has experience across industries such as Real Estate, Logistics & Supply Chain, Construction, Information Technology, Education and Automotive, and its average project cost is reported at $10000+.

Company Info

Founded 2001
Employees 1000+
Hourly Rate $50 - $99
Avg. Project Cost $55,000+
Client Rating 4.4/5 (12 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.4
Schedule
4.3
Cost
4.3
Communication
4.3