UXBERT Labs - The Best UX Design & Digital Agency in Saudi Arabia

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.3/5 (12 reviews)
+966534556600 hello@uxbert.com Visit Website

About UXBERT Labs - The Best UX Design & Digital Agency in Saudi Arabia

UXBERT Labs - The Best UX Design & Digital Agency in Saudi Arabia has been in business since 2012, delivering technology projects for clients. Their core services include UI/UX Design and Mobile App Development. The company operates with a team of 50 - 249 professionals. Clients can expect pricing around $100 - $149 / hr/hr, with projects averaging about $10,000. UXBERT Labs - The Best UX Design & Digital Agency in Saudi Arabia holds a 5.0-star rating across 2 client reviews. Overall, UXBERT Labs - The Best UX Design & Digital Agency in Saudi Arabia is one of the options worth shortlisting for a technology project.

Where We Specialize

31% VR App Development
VR App Development 31%
Mobile App Development 27%
Business Analysis & Consulting 20%
AI Development 11%
Ruby on Rails Development 6%
Enterprise App Modernization 5%

Industry Expertise

Logistics35% Real Estate34% Automotive31%

Typical Project Size

43% Enterprise
31% Midmarket Business
26% Small Business

UXBERT Labs - The Best UX Design & Digital Agency in Saudi Arabia Reviews

Write a Review

A partnership that began with a single project and earned a place on our preferred vendor list

Jia Hui Tan / VP of Engineering - RedDot Technologies Pte Ltd
Verified
Feb 02, 2026

Project summary: Our connected vehicle platform needed to handle telemetry data from an expanding EV fleet while supporting over-the-air update orchestration. No off-the-shelf platform handled both requirements well.

The integration layer was the part of the project I was most concerned about going in. Our system landscape is complex, several of the upstream APIs we relied on were poorly documented, and two third-party vendors had a history of unpredictable response times on integration questions. This team managed all of that. They documented what the upstream vendors could not, built resilience into the integration architecture where the upstream behaviour was unreliable, and delivered a solution that works as specified in production. I could not have asked for more.

PROS

Production system that has performed as specified since go-live without remediation work, documentation thorough enough to support internal maintenance, knowledge transfer that left our team genuinely capable

CONS

Time zone coordination required some deliberate overlap management from both sides in the first couple of sprints, after which we had an efficient async rhythm that worked for the whole project

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.0
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypePOS System Development
IndustryAutomotive
Project Cost$150,000 to $499,999
DurationJul 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
RedDot Technologies Pte Ltd is an established Automotive organisation headquartered in Singapore. My role as VP of Engineering covers both strategic planning and operational technology delivery. We maintain high standards for our vendors because our clients hold us to high standards — a bar we expect our partners to meet.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Regulatory requirements in our Automotive segment had changed and the compliance timeline was set by our regulator, not by us. The POS System Development changes required were significant enough to justify engaging a specialist partner rather than diverting our internal team from the product roadmap.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The core engagement was POS System Development delivery, though their scope expanded to include technical consultancy during discovery that materially improved our requirements. They also took ownership of the third-party integration workstream that had been a coordination challenge in previous projects, removing that complexity from our internal team entirely.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We ran a structured shortlisting process across five vendors. The technical evaluation eliminated two immediately. Of the remaining three, this team's proposal was differentiated by the specificity of their POS System Development approach and the evidence base they provided — reference projects in Automotive contexts, not generic case studies. The reference calls confirmed a track record that the proposal had described accurately.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Better than we managed ourselves going in. The workshops they facilitated surfaced assumptions we had not examined and exposed three requirements that were in direct conflict with each other. Resolving those before development began saved us what would certainly have been significant rework later in the project.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management framework was the most structured I have experienced with an external vendor. Sprint planning was tight, acceptance criteria were specific, retrospectives were honest and acted on. The project manager treated the shared backlog as a live document and the risk register as an operational tool rather than a compliance artefact. I never had to ask for a status update.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the approved budget. The estimation accuracy was notable — they had broken the work down in sufficient detail during discovery that their forecast proved reliable throughout, rather than being a number that shifted with every change in scope. We received one change request and it was for scope we had introduced ourselves.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live four months ago. User adoption exceeded the target we had set by 23 percent in the first month. Support ticket volume has dropped measurably. The features we had deferred because the previous architecture made them prohibitively expensive to build are now in development. The platform they built has opened our roadmap.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who participated in the discovery sessions were the engineers who built the system. That consistency of institutional knowledge across a six-month project has a value that is difficult to quantify but easy to notice when it is absent. Every conversation built on the previous ones.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. With a specific note that the value starts in the discovery phase — clients who approach that process with seriousness will get the most from the engagement. We invested appropriately at the front end and the returns are evident in what was delivered.

The outcome we specified, delivered the way we needed it, by people we would hire again

Rupert Ashford / Director of eCommerce - Hargrove Retail PLC
Verified
Jan 06, 2026

Project summary: Our client portal had been built in 2017 and had not received meaningful investment since. Clients were contrasting it unfavourably with the portals of our competitors in pitches.

We had worked with three agencies before this engagement. The comparison is not flattering to the others. What distinguished this team was a systematic approach to understanding the problem before proposing a solution — something that sounds obvious and is practiced far less often than it should be. The delivery phase ran to schedule, the codebase is clean enough that our internal engineers made positive comments during handover review, and we have not logged a critical incident in five months of live operation. We intend to use them for our next phase of work.

PROS

Clear and consistent communication adapted appropriately for both technical and non-technical stakeholders, shared tooling that gave our team real-time visibility, reliable sprint delivery throughout

CONS

Time zone coordination required some deliberate overlap management from both sides in the first couple of sprints, after which we had an efficient async rhythm that worked for the whole project

4.0
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.0
Schedule
4.0
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeEmbedded Systems Development
IndustryLegal Services
Project Cost$10,000 to $49,999
DurationJan 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Hargrove Retail PLC, a growth-stage Legal Services business based in Manchester, UK. As Director of eCommerce my remit spans product engineering, platform operations, and strategic vendor partnerships. We had reached an inflection point where our internal capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap at the pace our market required.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our platform had been maintained by a previous vendor for three years and the accumulated technical debt had reached a point where delivery velocity had dropped to a fraction of what it should have been. We needed fresh engineering expertise and a structured plan to address the underlying issues.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end Embedded Systems Development delivery with particular depth in the integration and data migration components, which were the highest-risk elements of the programme. They supplemented this with a dedicated QA resource throughout development and a documented runbook for our operations team at handover.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We ran a structured shortlisting process across five vendors. The technical evaluation eliminated two immediately. Of the remaining three, this team's proposal was differentiated by the specificity of their Embedded Systems Development approach and the evidence base they provided — reference projects in Legal Services contexts, not generic case studies. The reference calls confirmed a track record that the proposal had described accurately.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Better than we managed ourselves going in. The workshops they facilitated surfaced assumptions we had not examined and exposed three requirements that were in direct conflict with each other. Resolving those before development began saved us what would certainly have been significant rework later in the project.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the approved budget. The estimation accuracy was notable — they had broken the work down in sufficient detail during discovery that their forecast proved reliable throughout, rather than being a number that shifted with every change in scope. We received one change request and it was for scope we had introduced ourselves.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live four months ago. User adoption exceeded the target we had set by 23 percent in the first month. Support ticket volume has dropped measurably. The features we had deferred because the previous architecture made them prohibitively expensive to build are now in development. The platform they built has opened our roadmap.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who participated in the discovery sessions were the engineers who built the system. That consistency of institutional knowledge across a six-month project has a value that is difficult to quantify but easy to notice when it is absent. Every conversation built on the previous ones.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. With a specific note that the value starts in the discovery phase — clients who approach that process with seriousness will get the most from the engagement. We invested appropriately at the front end and the returns are evident in what was delivered.

FAQs

What services does UXBERT offer?
UXBERT provides software development services that may include mobile app development, web development, custom software development, UI/UX design, cloud solutions, AI development, and enterprise application development. Its core focus areas include Enterprise App Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design, Web Design and Web Development.
Which industries does UXBERT serve?
UXBERT has experience working with businesses across multiple industries, including Fashion & Apparel, Automotive, Retail & E-commerce, Environmental Services, Sports & Fitness and Mining & Metals.
How long does UXBERT take to complete a software project?
Project timelines vary depending on scope and complexity. A simple MVP may take a few weeks, while enterprise software or large-scale digital transformation projects can require several months of development, testing, and deployment. With a team of 10 - 49 professionals, UXBERT can scale resources based on project urgency.
Why should businesses choose UXBERT?
Businesses may choose UXBERT based on factors such as technical expertise, industry experience, client reviews, development methodology, communication practices, and the ability to deliver scalable software solutions that align with business objectives. Founded in 2012, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
How can I contact UXBERT for a project?
Businesses can contact UXBERT through its official website, email, or contact form to discuss project requirements, request a consultation, or receive a development estimate. For context, its listed capabilities span Enterprise App Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design, Web Design and Web Development, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
How do I choose the right software development company?
When selecting a software development company like UXBERT, consider its portfolio, client reviews, industry expertise, technical capabilities, communication process, pricing model, project management approach, and post-launch support. For context, its listed capabilities span Enterprise App Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design, Web Design and Web Development, and it has been operating since 2012.
Is UXBERT an offshore software development company?
UXBERT may operate as an offshore, onshore, or hybrid software development company depending on its location and the markets it serves. For context, it has experience across industries such as Fashion & Apparel, Automotive, Retail & E-commerce, Environmental Services, Sports & Fitness and Mining & Metals, and its listed capabilities span Enterprise App Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design, Web Design and Web Development.
Does UXBERT offer dedicated developers?
Yes, many companies like UXBERT provide a dedicated developer hiring model, allowing businesses to scale their in-house team with experienced professionals who work exclusively on their project. For context, it has served clients in Saudi-arabia, and it has experience across industries such as Fashion & Apparel, Automotive, Retail & E-commerce, Environmental Services, Sports & Fitness and Mining & Metals.
Can UXBERT build AI-powered applications?
Many modern software development companies, including UXBERT, offer AI and machine learning integration services such as chatbots, predictive analytics, computer vision, and intelligent automation. For context, it has experience across industries such as Fashion & Apparel, Automotive, Retail & E-commerce, Environmental Services, Sports & Fitness and Mining & Metals, and it has served clients in Saudi-arabia.
Does UXBERT develop SaaS products?
Yes, UXBERT may offer SaaS product development services, including multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing integration, and cloud-native deployment for scalable software-as-a-service solutions. For context, it has served clients in Saudi-arabia, and its average project cost is reported at $25000+.

Company Info

Founded 2012
Employees 50 - 249
Hourly Rate $100 - $149 / hr
Avg. Project Cost $60,000+
Client Rating 4.3/5 (12 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.1
Schedule
4.3
Cost
4.1
Communication
4.0