Velmie

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.5/5 (12 reviews)
650-353-7636 hello@velmie.com Visit Website

About Velmie

Velmie is a full-service software development firm with offices across the globe. Our headquarters is based in the globally recognized Hi-Tech Park in Belarus. We house the top senior developers and have over 10 years of experience. We provide incredible pricing without sacrificing quality. We have hundreds of happy customers including companies like Ford. Our customer satisfaction speaks for itself. We were honored to be named as on of the top blockchain development agencies in the NYC area by Clutch.co

Whether you have an idea, on-going project, or you are just curious about blockchain; we provide free consultations. We will educate you and your team on what it will take to accomplish a project and what technologies we recommend to do the job right. Contact us today for a free consultation.

Services

IoT App Development Blockchain Development Cryptocurrency Wallet Development DevOps & Cloud

Industries Served

Healthcare Human Resources

Velmie Reviews

Write a Review

IoT architecture that scaled from pilot to full fleet without a single redesign

Bilal Chaudhry / Co-Founder & CTO - Indus Software House
Verified
Jan 15, 2026

Project summary: Remote care had gone from an experiment to a core service line and our technology had not kept pace. We needed a robust, compliant telehealth platform in a timeline that the market would not wait for.

We gave this team an aggressive timeline, a technically complex scope, and a client-side project team that was stretched thin and not always available at the speed the engagement required. They absorbed all of that gracefully. Where they needed input they were precise about what they needed and when. Where they could proceed independently they did. The result was a delivery that landed on time despite the constraints on our side, which I regard as evidence of genuine professional maturity.

PROS

Senior-level engineering presence throughout the entire project, not just during the pitch, honest and commercially fair handling of scope changes, codebase that our internal team praised on review

CONS

Pipeline availability for kickoff required a few weeks of lead time — in hindsight that selection pressure means you are working with a team that is in demand for the right reasons

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.5
Schedule
5.0
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeIoT Development
IndustryHealthcare
Project Cost$150,000 to $499,999
DurationFeb 2025 – Oct 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Indus Software House is an established Healthcare organisation headquartered in Islamabad, Pakistan. My role as Co-Founder & CTO covers both strategic planning and operational technology delivery. We maintain high standards for our vendors because our clients hold us to high standards — a bar we expect our partners to meet.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
A competitive threat had accelerated our roadmap. We had planned a significant IoT Development investment for the following year. External pressure moved that timeline forward by six months and required us to find an external partner rather than attempting to build internally in the time available.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The scope covered the full IoT Development lifecycle: discovery and requirements definition, solution architecture, iterative development across twelve sprints, integration testing, performance validation, production deployment, and a structured four-week hypercare period. They also provided system documentation and a knowledge transfer programme for our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
A trusted peer in the Healthcare sector had used them for a comparable IoT Development engagement and their recommendation was unequivocal. Our own due diligence confirmed the pattern they described. The combination of domain knowledge, IoT Development depth, and demonstrated delivery discipline was the deciding factor.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thoroughly and precisely. The requirements document they produced was detailed enough that our QA team used it directly to write acceptance criteria. Every user story had a defined business objective attached. Nothing was left to interpretation. That discipline in the requirements phase paid dividends throughout development and testing.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the approved budget. The estimation accuracy was notable — they had broken the work down in sufficient detail during discovery that their forecast proved reliable throughout, rather than being a number that shifted with every change in scope. We received one change request and it was for scope we had introduced ourselves.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantifying the impact precisely is complicated by other variables in our business, but the metrics we can attribute directly to the IoT Development work are meaningful: session duration up, conversion rate up, error rate down, and our NPS for the digital touchpoint has improved by eleven points. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. With a specific note that the value starts in the discovery phase — clients who approach that process with seriousness will get the most from the engagement. We invested appropriately at the front end and the returns are evident in what was delivered.

Project execution that matched the proposal in every dimension that mattered

Beatriz Cavalcanti / Chief Digital Officer - Cerrado Tech SA
Verified
Jan 01, 2026

Project summary: The project had a board-facing delivery date tied to a strategic initiative. We needed a partner who would treat that date as their own, not ours.

The integration layer was the part of the project I was most concerned about going in. Our system landscape is complex, several of the upstream APIs we relied on were poorly documented, and two third-party vendors had a history of unpredictable response times on integration questions. This team managed all of that. They documented what the upstream vendors could not, built resilience into the integration architecture where the upstream behaviour was unreliable, and delivered a solution that works as specified in production. I could not have asked for more.

PROS

Production system that has performed as specified since go-live without remediation work, documentation thorough enough to support internal maintenance, knowledge transfer that left our team genuinely capable

CONS

Their insistence on a detailed functional specification before development began felt like friction at the time. In retrospect, it was the reason the development phase ran without the ambiguity that has derailed similar projects for us previously

4.5
Overall
4.0
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.0
Communication
Project TypePOS System Development
IndustryHuman Resources
Project Cost$150,000 to $499,999
DurationSep 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Cerrado Tech SA operates in the Human Resources sector with headquarters in Brasília, Brazil. In my role as Chief Digital Officer I am accountable for the full technology agenda — infrastructure, product, and vendor relationships. We are a commercially driven organisation and every technology decision is evaluated against a clear business case before it is approved.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Regulatory requirements in our Human Resources segment had changed and the compliance timeline was set by our regulator, not by us. The POS System Development changes required were significant enough to justify engaging a specialist partner rather than diverting our internal team from the product roadmap.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The core engagement was POS System Development delivery, though their scope expanded to include technical consultancy during discovery that materially improved our requirements. They also took ownership of the third-party integration workstream that had been a coordination challenge in previous projects, removing that complexity from our internal team entirely.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
A trusted peer in the Human Resources sector had used them for a comparable POS System Development engagement and their recommendation was unequivocal. Our own due diligence confirmed the pattern they described. The combination of domain knowledge, POS System Development depth, and demonstrated delivery discipline was the deciding factor.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thoroughly and precisely. The requirements document they produced was detailed enough that our QA team used it directly to write acceptance criteria. Every user story had a defined business objective attached. Nothing was left to interpretation. That discipline in the requirements phase paid dividends throughout development and testing.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management framework was the most structured I have experienced with an external vendor. Sprint planning was tight, acceptance criteria were specific, retrospectives were honest and acted on. The project manager treated the shared backlog as a live document and the risk register as an operational tool rather than a compliance artefact. I never had to ask for a status update.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I had privately built a contingency expectation into my planning given the project complexity and the number of integrations involved. None of that contingency was needed. The delivery landed on the agreed date and the final invoice matched the approved budget to within a fraction of a percent. That outcome is rarer than the industry acknowledges.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantifying the impact precisely is complicated by other variables in our business, but the metrics we can attribute directly to the POS System Development work are meaningful: session duration up, conversion rate up, error rate down, and our NPS for the digital touchpoint has improved by eleven points. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who participated in the discovery sessions were the engineers who built the system. That consistency of institutional knowledge across a six-month project has a value that is difficult to quantify but easy to notice when it is absent. Every conversation built on the previous ones.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. I would add the context that this is not the cheapest option in the market and they are selective about the engagements they take on. If your primary criterion is price, there are alternatives. If you want a technology partner who can be trusted with a complex POS System Development programme in the Human Resources space and will deliver against a serious brief, this is the team.

FAQs

Which industries does Velmie serve?
Velmie has experience working with businesses across multiple industries, including Automotive, Real Estate, Telecommunications, Manufacturing, Retail & E-commerce and Healthcare.
How long does Velmie take to complete a software project?
Project timelines vary depending on scope and complexity. A simple MVP may take a few weeks, while enterprise software or large-scale digital transformation projects can require several months of development, testing, and deployment. With a team of 50 - 249 professionals, Velmie can scale resources based on project urgency.
How can I contact Velmie for a project?
Businesses can contact Velmie through its official website, email, or contact form to discuss project requirements, request a consultation, or receive a development estimate. For context, its listed capabilities span DevOps & Cloud, Cryptocurrency Wallet Development, Blockchain Development and IoT App Development, and it has served clients in USA.
Does Velmie offer dedicated developers?
Yes, many companies like Velmie provide a dedicated developer hiring model, allowing businesses to scale their in-house team with experienced professionals who work exclusively on their project. For context, it has served clients in USA, and its average project cost is reported at $5000000+.
What engagement models does Velmie provide?
Velmie may offer multiple engagement models such as fixed-price contracts, dedicated team hiring, and time-and-material billing, allowing businesses to choose the option that best fits their budget and project scope. For context, its listed capabilities span DevOps & Cloud, Cryptocurrency Wallet Development, Blockchain Development and IoT App Development, and its typical hourly rate is around $50 - $99.
Does Velmie sign an NDA before starting a project?
Most professional software development companies, including Velmie, are willing to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) to protect client data and project confidentiality before development begins. For context, its listed capabilities span DevOps & Cloud, Cryptocurrency Wallet Development, Blockchain Development and IoT App Development, and it has experience across industries such as Automotive, Real Estate, Telecommunications, Manufacturing, Retail & E-commerce and Healthcare.
Which countries does Velmie serve?
Velmie may serve clients across multiple countries and regions, including USA, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
Does Velmie develop SaaS products?
Yes, Velmie may offer SaaS product development services, including multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing integration, and cloud-native deployment for scalable software-as-a-service solutions. For context, it has experience across industries such as Automotive, Real Estate, Telecommunications, Manufacturing, Retail & E-commerce and Healthcare, and its typical hourly rate is around $50 - $99.
Can Velmie modernize legacy software?
Velmie may provide legacy software modernization services, including re-platforming, code refactoring, and migration to modern frameworks or cloud infrastructure to improve performance and maintainability. For context, it has served clients in USA, and its average project cost is reported at $5000000+.
How do I request a proposal from Velmie?
You can request a proposal from Velmie by submitting your project requirements through its website contact form, email, or by reaching out directly to discuss your business goals and receive a tailored development estimate. For context, it has experience across industries such as Automotive, Real Estate, Telecommunications, Manufacturing, Retail & E-commerce and Healthcare, and it has been operating since 2007.

Company Info

Founded 2007
Employees 50 - 249
Hourly Rate $50 - $99
Avg. Project Cost $40,000+
Client Rating 4.5/5 (12 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.6
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.5
Communication
4.6